Freeports in England to get £25m each – while Wales is offered £8m, says minister
Freeports in England are to receive £25m in financial support each, while Wales is being offered £8m to set one up, according to a Welsh Government minister.
Lesley Griffiths, the Minister for Rural Affairs, told the Senedd that the offer of money from the UK Treasury to set up a freeport in Wales is “completely unacceptable”.
She was responding to a question from Conservative MS Mark Isherwood, who asked about the possibility of setting up a freeport in Holyhead, Anglesey.
Griffiths also criticised the UK Government’s Welsh Secretary Simon Hart for threatening to impose a freeport on Wales “without our agreement”.
The Minister for Rural Affairs said: “Well, at present, no formal offer has been presented to the Welsh Government on a proposed Welsh freeport.
“But we have been absolutely clear that we cannot accept the proposal that a Welsh freeport would receive just £8 million in financial support while every freeport in England gets £25 million.
“I’m sure the Member would agree that’s completely unacceptable. And Welsh Ministers did write to the UK Treasury, back in February, making that very clear.
“And we also set out conditions where a joint approach could be taken, but as yet we haven’t received a response to that letter. So, it’s not possible to take a decision on it unless we have a response from the UK Government.
“I’m sure, again, you will agree that the Secretary of State’s suggestion that the UK Government might choose to implement a freeport in Wales, without our agreement, represents yet another example of a top-down throwback to pre-devolution economic policy, where the message was, ‘In Wales, you’ll get what you’re given.’ And the UK Government need to work with us not against us.
‘Each UK nation’
Mark Isherwood said: “The UK Government is establishing 10 or more freeports around the UK, and wants to establish a freeport in each UK nation.
“This will require a joined-up approach, with businesses, communities, local authorities and the Welsh Government all coming on board.
“The UK freeport model encompasses a broad set of measures to stimulate economic activity, while creating jobs and having a regenerative effect on ports, local communities and economies.”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Don’t people get it yet? We are Cinderella, we are Harry Potter under the stairs. Or worse we are Bulls Eye, Bill Sikes’s unloved dog that reflects its owner’s personality and even dies once Sikes is killed.
That is what we can expect by being a colony of England.
Like we want one of these?? https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2021/05/10/johnsons-freeports-are-already-failing-to-deliver-but-the-process-of-corrosion-once-it-has-begun-is-hard-to-stop/
I’m sure the Senedd would negotiate a fair deal in good faith. Unfortunately the Westminster government will not. They will not learn or mend their ways until we vote yes to Independence.
You mean the MS.
Nothing unusual about this – Cymru has been shat on for centuries. Let’s not dwell on it let’s just get out.
English ports are bigger. They take more people and more freight to more areas.
Therefore they cost more to run.
This “shat on” line is pathetic.
And why are they bigger? Because they get more money, enabling them to take more people and more freight to more areas. It’s not a difficult equation. Westminster is protecting the status quo. One Britain One Nation my muscular behind! Newsflash! We will not all be “Levelling up” in Boris’ fascist Valhalla.
If you think Steve’s last line was “pathetic”, then so is your understanding of Cymru’s history. The inclusion of Agricola (whether Tacitus or the commander of XX Valeria Victrix – that yr Issyllwr destroyed) does suggest you are a fan of the propaganda of invaders.
They are bigger because they are England and serve a more populous and wealthy land mass – Europe.
The Tacitus one.
You really need to do your homework on the significance of Holyhead to the English economy.
Anyhow, Associated British Ports is owned by Singapore and Kuwait so why are you in such a rush to subsidise “Furrins”?
Holyhead does not have the same numbers or significance of ports serving the European mainland and beyond.
I don’t care who owns any port. It is a global economy. Anyone can own anything.
In 2012 Mark Isherwood’s party was in power and allowed the legislation which had enabled 12 existing UK Freeports to lapse. I believe the reasoning then was that Freeports encouraged corruption and money laundering.
Of course now that his party is entirely geared toward corruption and money laundering he is all for them.