Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Minister blasts Shared Prosperity Fund as ‘an assault on devolution in Wales’

05 May 2022 3 minute read
Rebecca Evans AM. Photo National Assembly for Wales and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic

Rebecca Evans MS, Minister for Finance and Local Government, has accused the UK Government of a “an assault on devolution in Wales” and says UK ministers have failed to meet repeated promises that Wales “will not be a penny worse off” after the UK left the EU.

Her comments follow an analysis of Westminster’s plans for the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF), which replaces the European Regional Development and European Social Funds.

Following the methodology used by the UK Government in relation to its UKSPF calculations, the Welsh Government says it has lost funding of £772m under the new arrangements.

The Conservatives manifesto for the 2019 election pledged to replace and “at a minimum match the size” of former EU funding in each nation of the UK.

Local control

Last month, The UK Government announced conditional allocations for the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, saying it has matched previous EU funding but with less bureaucracy and more local control.

The fund includes £559 million for Multiply, a UK-wide adult numeracy programme, to offer maths courses for adults with no or low maths skills, including a digital learning platform.

The Welsh Government has also raised serious concerns about this schemes which the minster says is “a further unacceptable encroachment by the UK Government into a devolved policy area and will conflict with and duplicate existing provision in Wales” and will topslice £101m from its funding.

Overall, England will receive £1.588 billion from the fund, Wales £585 million, Scotland £212 million, Northern Ireland £127 million, with the remaining £129 million being allocated for the central system needed for Multiply.

Under the EU aid system, the Welsh government administered the cash in agreement with the European Commission.

Under the new scheme, local authorities will be encouraged to work together on regional committees to decide how the money will be used – with the Welsh Government effectively bypassed on spending decisions.

Failure

In a written statement, the minister noted: “The decision to bypass the Welsh Government and directly allocate replacement EU funding, at a dramatically diminished level, through UK-wide funds is not only an assault on devolution in Wales, but as the figures in this statement clearly show, also a failure to meet repeated promises that Wales “will not be a penny worse off” after the UK left the EU.

“Having less say over less money means there will be hard decisions to make for the Welsh Government and other institutions across business, higher education and further education, and the third sector who have used Structural and Investment Funds to support vital investments in research and innovation, business competitiveness, skills, employability, zero-carbon, sustainable communities, infrastructure and connectivity, and support for vulnerable people.

“These sectors have already raised concerns with the Welsh Government about the funding gaps they face as a result of the UK Government’s actions.

“The UK Government’s decision to bypass the Welsh Government and directly allocate replacement EU funding, at a dramatically diminished level, through UK-wide funds is not only an assault on devolution in Wales, but as the figures in this statement clearly show, also a failure to meet repeated promises that Wales “will not be a penny worse off” after the UK left the EU.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve Duggan
Steve Duggan
1 year ago

Look, the UK gov. doesn’t have the money (unless it borrows more – which it won’t) – why? Brexit. In saying that, the UK gov and the Tories in particular never give Cymru adequate funding – its why we had so much EU funding in the first place.

Llinos
Llinos
1 year ago
Reply to  Steve Duggan

I agree. I hope the Welsh people who voted for Brexit are still proud of themselves, knowing the damage they have wrought on our nation and on the “Kingdom”

Y Cymro
Y Cymro
1 year ago

The Tory shared prosperity fund is an act of taking money that once came to Wales from Europe and redeploying to Northern English red wall areas who voted Conservative. Then Welsh Secretary Alun Cairns, present one Simon Hart and Welsh Office Minister David Davies MP for Monmouth are all culpable in the barefaced lie that Wales would not lose one penny funding but receive more money when we left the EU including Whitehall respecting Welsh devolution Post-Brexit. They not only fleeced Wales of tens of millions of pounds but also interfered with Senedd competency and right to administrate those meagre… Read more »

Y Cymro
Y Cymro
1 year ago

What a selfish attitude to have? Thanks to Brexit Wales & Wrexham have lost not only hundreds of millions in once EU Structural Funding, but Wales has lost powers of state and the right to administrate those funds. And you wallow in the fact that this Tory idiocracy gave Wrexham loose change because you voted Tory last General Election. Shameful? You not only sold Wales down the river, but also aided the Tory corruption & Partygate. And don’t forget this. The EU never denied our Senedd Cymru or Welsh Government’s right to administrate those EU funds received. Oh but Tory… Read more »

Fi yn unig
Fi yn unig
1 year ago

The key word here is ‘bypass’. If the UK Government bypasses the Welsh Government and treats all local authorities in Wales as English ones, this is a blatant non recognition of our country and a total reversal of a full recognition we formerly enjoyed from the EU. The ‘bypass’ that needs building runs from Cardiff to Brussels.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.