Arron Banks may stand for the Senedd – Reform source

Martin Shipton
Controversial Brexit donor Arron Banks is involved in assessing would-be Reform UK candidates for next year’s Senedd election, and may stand for election himself, we have been told.
The self-styled “Bad Boy of Brexit” is a close associate of Nigel Farage and was the biggest donor to the Leave.EU campaign, one of the two major groups campaigning for the UK to quit the EU at the 2016 referendum.
In recent weeks Mr Banks’ output on X – formerly Twitter – has contained a lot of Wales-related content.
He has been critical of the Welsh Government over a variety of issues, including its 20mph speed limit policy, its diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) spending and its “Nation of Sanctuary” initiative.
Mr Banks has also attacked Plaid Cymru, posting in response to a Plaid party broadcast: “Anyone that thinks more socialism is the answer to Wales’ problems needs medical advice.”
Welsh history
Perhaps surprisingly, he has been supportive of the Welsh language, posting a message which stated: “Every school kid in Wales should learn Welsh & know Welsh history, and be proud of it.”
He has also engaged in spats on X with former WalesOnline journalist Will Hayward.
A Reform insider told Nation.Cymru: “Arron is a very important figure in Reform and is taking a particular interest in the party’s progress in Wales, where some polls have shown it overtaking Labour.
“He certainly has a role in assessing possible candidates for next year’s Senedd election. The party is keen to avoid the splits that occurred after seven UKIP AMs were elected in 2016 and the group soon fell apart.
“It is quite likely that Arron will seek to stand himself, especially if he thought he had a chance of becoming leader of the party in Wales and First Minister.
“He sometimes comes across as brash, but that’s an image he cultivates, like Boris Johnson cultivates his image as an oaf. Aaron is in fact highly intelligent as well as being mischievous. He’ll think he can do a better job than the rest of them.”
To qualify to stand Mr Banks would need to have a home in Wales. While he doesn’t at present, he could easily buy a property, the Reform insider told us.
Donations
In November 2017, the Electoral Commission announced that it was investigating whether election rules were broken during the EU referendum, in donations worth a total of £8.4 million to Leave.EU campaigners made by Banks and by Better for the Country Ltd, a company of which Mr Banks was a registered director.
The National Crime Agency investigated Leave.EU, Banks as well as other individuals and entities, following the referral of material from a second Electoral Commission investigation. The referral was announced amid concerns that Banks was not the true source of £8m donated to Leave.EU. In September 2019 the National Crime Agency said it had found no evidence of criminality after investigating a series of claims against the Brexit campaign group Leave.EU and Arron Banks. The NCA said: “It will therefore take no further action against Mr Banks, Better for the Country Ltd or Leave.EU in respect of this specific matter.”
From September 2015, Banks, along with Andy Wigmore, had multiple meetings with Russian officials posted at the Russian embassy in London. In November 2015, Alexander Yakovenko, the Russian ambassador, introduced Banks to a Russian businessman, which was followed by other business proposals on the part of Russians. Banks was offered a chance to invest in Russian-owned gold or diamond mines; the deal involved funding from a Russian state-owned bank, and was announced 12 days after the Brexit referendum. It is not clear if Banks invested.
‘Boozy lunch’
For two years, Banks said his only contacts with the Russian government consisted of one “boozy lunch” with the ambassador. After The Observer reported that he had had multiple meetings at which he had been offered lucrative business deals, Banks told a parliamentary inquiry into fake news he had had “two or three” meetings. In July 2018 when pressed by The New York Times, he said there had been a fourth meeting. The Observer has seen evidence that suggests his Leave.EU campaign team met with Russian embassy officials as many as 11 times in the run-up to the EU referendum and in the two months beyond.
It has been reported that on November 12 2016, Banks had a meeting with president-elect Donald Trump in Trump Tower and that upon return to London, Banks had lunch with the Russian ambassador where they discussed the Trump visit.
In a defamation claim against the Welsh journalist Carole Cadwalladr, Banks was awarded £35,000 in damages and 60% of his costs. Banks said he was defamed after comments Cadwalladr made about his relationship with the Russian state.Banks initially lost his case in the High Court but partly succeeded in the Court of Appeal. The Appeal Judges ruled he was due damages for a Ted Talk given by Cadwalladr. While covered by a public interest defence when it was originally given, that defence fell away on 29 April 2020 when the Electoral Commission issued a statement that Banks did not commit any criminal offence. The Court of Appeal found the views of the Ted Talk after this date caused Banks serious harm, hence the damages. All other points of the appeal by Banks were dismissed.
This legal action carried out by Banks was considered by 19 press freedom organisations to be a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) and abuse of law.
In 2023, following Banks’ partial success in an appeal, Cadwalladr was ordered to pay about £1.2 million in legal costs[81] Afterwards, Cadwalladr set up a crowdfunding site to help fund her defence. Banks has called it “vindication”
Belize
In 2018 Mr Banks revealed that he had been the accredited representative of a Central American country in Wales for nearly two years, despite hardly anyone knowing about it.
Mr Banks said on Twitter that he had been “Honorary Consul for Cardiff” on behalf of Belize, a former British colony previously known as British Honduras.
In fact Mr Banks, a multi-millionaire businessman based in Bristol, meant Honorary Consul to Wales – a post he held from June 10, 2015, until March 15, 2017, the Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) confirmed.
His previously unacknowledged role came to light during a Twitter exchange with Cadwalladr, who had been looking into links between Mr Banks and Russia.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
The very last thing we need is an immigrant from Bristol to seek to impose himself upon a Senedd list. But that’s the way these Brexiteers and their b*****d son, Reform, work. What they can’t persuade with populist dogma, they try to buy. Remember Nathan Gill!
I thought Wales was a ‘sanctuary’ nation Alwyn: not very liberal of you.
Are you suggesting Mr Banks is fleeing war or persecution? Tell us more.
Ah, of course! What if he arrived on a dinghy, having escaped that war-torn, totalitarian hell-hole called France? Would he be welcome then?
As you well know the international rules don’t work like that otherwise the safe states bordering war zones would collapse creating their own refugee crises. This confected “why don’t they stay in France” argument reveals the arguer to be one of the not very bright.
why didn’t he stay in the first safe place ie Ross on Wye?
Has he ever set foot in Cymru?
I mean, like, EVER?
If elected Fromage could make him the minister for Education and Enterprise, Banks did start in business by stealing lead off the school roof while he was still a pupil.
I hope we hear more from the mother-in-law on the campaign trail.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6349061/Arron-Banks-innocent-says-Russian-mother-law.html
Declarations will be interesting.
how is Gill doing?
https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/what-we-learned-about-arron-banks-at-fake-news-inquiry/
How closely is he linked to Nathan Gill? What aren’t we being told?
Was the source Nathan I wonder…
There’s a word for men like Arron Banks. But I won’t say it in polite company.
A vote for Reform is a vote to abandon devolution
Not at the start, because devolution provides Reform with a useful ‘Trojan horse’ opening to get themselves elected into office. Right now they’ll view it as a means to an end.
But were Reform ever able to form – or even become a significant coalition partner in – a Westminster government, I think there’d be legislation to abolish devolution at some point during their first term of office.
So pleased to hear that “he could easily buy a property” here. What a lovely position to be in. Wonder how many of our young people are in the same position? Also, given his alleged support for Cymraeg, I’m sure he’ll immerse himself in our language and ensure that all Reform candidates do the same. Or am I being optimistic, or naive, when it comes to the intentions and actions of this self-styled ‘bad boy’?
What does he know about or even care about Wales? He just wants to get on the gravy train. How on earth could he, Farage or Trump know how working class people live?
You’ve brought it on yourselves folks!
Six member constituencies and the closed list system means that candidates – good or bad – can hide behind the party label, just as UKIP did in an earlier Assembly election.
Supporters of this lunatic democracy happily ignore the reality of numbers. In a FPTP system, aside from the candidate having to actually turn up and do something, to win means gaining around 30 – 35% or more of the vote. In PR, it can be as little as 10%.
Goodbye Senedd.
Spot on. The closed list system is a disaster waiting to happen. Invented by self serving Labour incumbents and foolishly supported by Plaid and the Lib Dem. 60 to 96 then to zero is a real medium term risk.
So you think it’s OK for a party to win all 40 FPTP seats with 30% of the vote but not OK for a party to win a tenth of the seats if they get 10% of the vote? An interesting take on how democracy should work.
This is the non argument presented by supporters of PR. It may well be seemingly unfair that 40 seats can be won with 30% of the electorate but the absolute, fundamental difference is that the members elected represent single member seats – and had to work for them! And represent them! No system is perfect, but what PR supporters neglect to mention is that the system can be so complex you can end up not electing the very candidates you wanted to be elected! The issue is more about choice than percentages. The Labour Party has dominated, often wining seats… Read more »
The problem with FPTP system is that politicians get elected with a mere 25-30% of the vote meaning that the remaining 70-75% of the constituents don’t get represented, we end up with a 2 party system where voters are forced to pick the ‘lesser of 2 evils’ this is one of the reasons why populism has been on the rise. The argument that ‘FPTP prevents extremists from winning power through the back door’ has now been debunked over the last decade. The Tories under Boris Johnson were taken over by those who should have been in UKIP, Corbyn and Starmer… Read more »
Yes, STV would have been much better. Some commentators think that if Reform go from mid 20s in the polls to circa 30%, then they could win 30+ seats in the Senedd. Unlikely today; but Labour are sinking without trace and I’m not convinced Plaid can break out of West and North West Wales.
Works like a laxative, doesn’t it. Mention a name – Banks, Farage, Trump and others – and out come the mix of bleating suckers who fall for it every time. Why not engage with your neighbours and friends, if you have any, and get them to see how much of a threat these guys really are to our nation.
I do and they are a massive threat. For example, you won’t find many redundant steelworkers prepared to give Labour or Plaid the benefit of the doubt.
Beats me why anyone would give Reform the benefit of the doubt!?
Calm down all of you…he will need to have lived in his main home in Wales for three years to qualify for selection!!!
So, it seems a bit of a send-up?
According to the legislation he just needs to be registered to vote in Wales.
Wrong…you have to LIVE in Wales for three years!!!
Where does it say that?
Hmm, like the Tory candidates who appear from nowhere?
Lots of innuendo, tittle-tattle and failed investigations that have unearthed little or nothing, for someone who might be trying to be a politician in Wales in future,
Whereas we have companies from outside Wales with real links to actual current politicians in Wales getting permission to develop wind farms, solar farms and other infrastructure and no serious questions being asked by journalists other than reporting another new installation or planning permission given, real things that are happening that are affecting people’s lives in Wales.
A timely reminder: Brexiteer journalist Isabel Oakshott uncovered evidence against Leave.eu (which was only disclosed later because “we don’t want to derail Brexit”), and stated that: “I am in no doubt [Aron] Banks and [Andy] Wigmore have been acting as agents of influence for the Russian state”.
It would be astonishing if someone had cast iron evidence that their state was being attacked by another state, and sat on it.
Gawain Towler is likely the source.