Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

‘Astonishing’ early reluctance to call pandemic a civil emergency in Wales, Covid inquiry hears

06 Mar 2024 4 minute read
Dr Quentin Sandifer. Photo Cardiff University

A leading public health official has criticised the Welsh Government for its failure to acknowledge the global coronavirus pandemic was a civil emergency, an inquiry heard.

Dr Quentin Sandifer, who was Public Health Wales’s medical director, said he was “astonished” the Welsh Government was still regarding the Covid-19 outbreak as a health-led incident as late as March 2020.

The World Health Organisation had in late January declared the new coronavirus, which had emerged from the Wuhan region of China, to be a “public health emergency of international concern”.

‘A seminal moment’

Giving evidence to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, Dr Sandifer was asked his opinion on how “seriously” the Welsh Government was taking the threat posed by the virus.

“I think January 31, even at the time, really felt like a seminal moment,” Dr Sandifer said.

“The chief medical officer of the UK standing up and saying we have the first two cases in the UK just about a month after it was first reported by China to the World Health Organisation.

“It just felt to me it was an inflection point in what we would call the pandemic and the emergence of this outbreak.

“I personally was starting to get very concerned now about the extent to which I could see – beyond the chief medical officer – a response from Welsh Government.”

Email

The inquiry heard an email was forwarded to Dr Sandifer from another Public Health Wales official on March 3 which stated the outbreak “is not a civil emergency situation” and was being kept under review.

Asked for his opinion on this, Dr Sandifer replied: “I was astonished at this.

“It is the beginning of March, and the Welsh Government resilience team were telling us they didn’t think we were approaching – if we weren’t already there – a civil emergency.”

“It is the case that the Welsh Government was considering it a health-led incident and the principal leadership, as I could see it, was coming from the chief medical officer.”

The witness suggested questions about that should be addressed to the Welsh Government.

Briefing 

The inquiry heard Public Health Wales prepared a briefing on March 11 making the case for the Welsh Government to declare a major incident.

It outlined predictions that Wales would see 1.5 million symptomatic cases, 200,000 requiring hospital admission, an estimated 18,000 needing mechanical ventilation and 25,000 predicted deaths.

The briefing also said that a “recurring theme of lessons learned” from past situations was that “major incidents are not declared soon enough”.

“The World Health Organisation declared a pandemic on March 11,” Dr Sandifer said.

“Following our first case on February 27 we began to see case numbers rise and by March 11 those case numbers were rising exponentially.

“I don’t think any of us knew at that time that Cobra had discussed the legislative basis for the response by then, I think on March 2, and had decided against using civil contingency legislation in favour of public health legislation.

“I just felt we need to lay our cards on the table and say to Welsh Government, ‘This is how we see it. Are you going to use emergency legislation?’.”

Dr Sandifer confirmed the response relayed to him from the Welsh Government was that such a declaration “would not be helpful”.

Covid tests

The inquiry also heard Dr Sandifer was concerned about the sourcing of Covid-19 tests for Wales in late February and his fears “national politics” would “trump public safety in Wales”.

He suggested there was a verbal agreement with pharmaceutical company Roche to supply Wales with 5,000 tests – yet most of these were later used for the UK-wide response.

“We didn’t have that in writing,” he said.

“My concern was that we were going to lose those tests, which of course events showed we subsequently did… we had about 500 tests.

“I was probably stepping out of line by speculating whether there was anything at UK Government level that might be behind that and emphasising my concern about the implications of losing that test capacity on public safety and need in Wales.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
1 month ago

If you spot any common sense emanating from anybody in Welsh Gov in the early days let me know…First case flew in from Italy, no surprise there…

Llyn
Llyn
1 month ago

If the Welsh Government had called a civil emergency a few weeks before the first UK lockdown and banned public meetings, etc the same people who are now having a go at the WG for inaction would be calling them out for acting like the Stasi and overreacting.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
1 month ago
Reply to  Llyn

There would be a few more of them in the chorus…

hdavies15
hdavies15
1 month ago
Reply to  Llyn

You may feel like excusing them for their inaction but plenty of others will never forgive the utterly lax attitude which transformed into the other extreme stance once they knew the covid was rampant. Yet another case of “horse had bolted.. shut the stable door”. Events in Italy were a safe predictor of how things would pan out here.

Llyn
Llyn
1 month ago
Reply to  hdavies15

What was the other extreme stance you talk about?

Brambo Baggins
Brambo Baggins
1 month ago

Keep sipping the Kool-Aid. The Welsh government of occupation simply did what they were told to do and implemented all the measures that maimed and killed more than the putative pandemic ever did like the rest of the UK did.

ci du
ci du
1 month ago
Reply to  Brambo Baggins

[citation needed]

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.