Support our Nation today - please donate here

Boris Johnson’s conduct questioned as review calls for constitutional reform

19 Sep 2023 5 minute read
Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Picture by Dan Kitwood / PA Wire.

The UK constitution is in urgent need of reform after a tumultuous period in politics exposed weaknesses that have damaged both public trust and the country’s international reputation, a major review has found.

A joint report by the Institute for Government and Cambridge University’s Bennett Institute for Public Policy said “further injury” had been caused by a series of scandals involving ministers and MPs, including those holding the highest offices being found to have broken the law.

The 18-month review was supported by an advisory board including former Conservative ministers Sir Robert Buckland and Sir David Lidington, shadow leader of the House of Lords Baroness Smith of Basildon and former Labour Mayor of Liverpool Joanna Anderson.

The report highlighted that the UK is an outlier internationally, with the constitution lacking “a central, codified source” and resting on the concept of parliamentary sovereignty.

This means there has been a historic reliance on “self-restraint from political actors rather than legal checks”, it added.

However, recent events were said to have tested the effectiveness of these arrangements, with the vote to leave the European Union leading to division over the appropriate balance of power between governing institutions. This was reflected in the UK Supreme Court ruling to set limits on executive power after Boris Johnson attempted to prorogue Parliament in September 2019.

Without consent

The report also highlights that the UK Government made decisions without the consent of devolved legislatures, raising questions over “the nature of the territorial constitution”.

Mr Johnson’s “misdemeanours” were highlighted as conduct that raised questions over ethics and integrity in politics in recent years.

The report said: “Boris Johnson’s attempt to prorogue parliament, disregard for the Ministerial Code, willingness to break the law while in office and misleading of parliament were all examples of a prime minister who, in the words of his cabinet secretary, believed he had ‘a mandate to test established boundaries’.

“Not all of his misdemeanours were unprecedented; but his premiership shone a light on existing problems within the UK’s governing arrangements, and heightened the concern that there has been a steady erosion of the tacit norms on which government in the UK rests.”

The report added that within the wider global context of “deepening public suspicion of governmental institutions and heightened political polarisation”, events over the last decade “have placed the UK’s constitution under immense strain, underlining the urgent need for serious thinking about the nature and trajectory of the UK’s constitution”.

Mr Johnson’s conduct was cited as an example of the behaviour a number of “constitutional actors” who showed a willingness to push the boundaries of the constitution and raising questions about the adequacy of checks and balances to “constrain political power”.

As a key example, the report cites ministers’ previous willingness to override international law over the implementation of the Northern Ireland protocol.

Despite senior civil servants resigning, interventions from former prime ministers and concerns expressed by the international community, the legislation passed the House of Commons in just over a month, with not a single rebellion from the Conservative backbenches.

Policy aims

Among several factors that have contributed to “the weakening of a sense of self-restraint in relation to constitutional norms on the part of government and politicians”, the report said “questions of constitutional process and propriety have often been seen as secondary to broader policy aims”.

A series of recommendations for change include establishing a new parliamentary committee on the constitution. This should have the power to delay legislation and creating an independent Office of the Constitution to the support the new committee in the way the National Audit Office supports the Public Accounts Committee.

The review also said Parliament should have a more extensive scrutiny process for new constitutional bills to ensure proposals are “thoroughly tested and attract cross-party support”, alongside clarification on the role of the civil service and strengthening its capacity to give constitutional advice.

Integrating public engagement through citizens’ juries and assemblies was also recommended.

Director of the Institute for Government, Hannah White, said: “Some governments enter office with a manifesto commitment to constitutional change, others find the temptation to tinker with the constitution comes upon them.

“Our recommendations are intended to ensure that any politician considering changing UK the constitution is supported with robust advice, and to ensure that the UK constitution is changed only with appropriate consideration and public support.”

Co-director of the Bennett Institute, Mike Kenny, said: “One of the key issues that this Review has explored is how to get more public engagement in discussions about the principles and norms underpinning our public life.

“There is a growing imperative for government to take much more seriously the challenge of ensuring that citizens’ deliberations become a regular, integral part of the processes of making and examining constitutional change.”

Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
6 months ago

Johnson ripped apart the system, a system that wasn’t ready for such a charlatan and wrecking ball and a system that supposedly relied on a “decent person” system. Just look at all lies he peddled at the dispatch box and the speaker can only suggest people go for an early coup of tea.
But his party supported him till the stench was too far gone. Politico’s in Wales continued to back him to the end. Culpability is rife in the Tory ranks. And look how they continue, and look how toothless the position of the speaker is.

6 months ago

Our future lies away from this rotten cabal, and the young of our country see this, with 57% 16 to 24 year olds recently polled wanting either indy or more powers. They have grown up seeing 13 years of Tory lies, and want a different way. It will come.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
6 months ago

Fat Shanks is to decency as Dwr Cymru is to rivers…

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
6 months ago
Reply to  Mab Meirion

Regarding rivers: anglers are under the impression that they come before fish eating birds! Tell that to the Osprey…

Bob Mortimer and Paul Whitehouse might care to cover this anthropocentrism…

Fi yn unig
Fi yn unig
6 months ago

‘Big wheel, turns slowly’ the saying goes but this report makes welcome reading although I can’t see there being the deserved day of reckoning for the Wild West gang whose criminal moral bankruptcy it references. However, Bozo and his gang SHOULD face that day. MPs are ‘Public Servants’. They serve the public and this means they must govern in service of and for the people who put them there. Since December 2019, there has been no governance for us, the people, only corruption, distraction, erosion of democracy, erosion of rights, a circus of scandals, lies on an industrial scale, and… Read more »

Dai Ponty
Dai Ponty
6 months ago

Constitutional reform should all the 4 countries going their own way 4 independent countries no U K not part of the commonwealth and Wales a Republic

6 months ago

The man utterly debased UK politics. He did at least shine a light on the inadequacies of its constitution. The lack of legal checks and the reliance on convention, the “primacy of Westminster” and the FPTP electoral system all majour flaws in British democracy. The answer is to replace the UK with a new union fit for purpose.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.