Chancellor rules out ‘tax and spend’ policies ahead of spring statement

The Chancellor has ruled out “tax and spend” policies ahead of her spring statement next week.
Rachel Reeves is under pressure to increase taxes or cut spending to meet the financial rules she set at the budget in October amid disappointing growth figures and higher-than-expected borrowing.
Figures released on Friday came as a further blow, showing that government borrowing had soared past forecasts in February.
She signalled that she would neither raise taxes nor Government budgets in an interview with the BBC.
“We can’t tax and spend our way to higher living standards and better public services. That’s not available in the world we live in today,” she said.
Defence
The defence budget has already been boosted by slashing spending on aid, and sweeping cuts to welfare were announced this week.
When she delivers her spring statement on Wednesday, Ms Reeves will be responding to new forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility made after the Bank of England reduced its forecasts for growth this year.
Public sector net borrowing was £10.7 billion in February, £4.2 billion more than had been forecast by the OBR.
Former Labour work and pensions secretary Lord Blunkett has urged the Chancellor to loosen her fiscal rules.
“I would like the Chancellor to loosen a little the self-imposed fiscal rules, this is Treasury orthodoxy and monetarism at its worst,” he told BBC Radio 4’s the Week in Westminster.
“I would lift them marginally. I would raise the self-imposed rule by at least £10-15 billion and I would spend a great chunk of it on what we did back in ‘97 with the new deal for the unemployed.”
Austerity
Treasury minister Darren Jones denied the Government was “blindly cutting spending” and moving towards austerity earlier this week.
Government departments have been asked to go through their spending line by line.
Experts estimate that around a million people in England and Wales will lose their disability benefits as part of a welfare overhaul that the Government believes will save more than £5 billion a year by the end of the decade.
Ms Reeves told the BBC: “I recognise that with the privilege of doing a job like the one I’m doing today also comes a great deal of scrutiny. I absolutely believe that every policy that I announce, every pound of public money, of taxpayers’ money that I spend, and every pound that I take from people is properly scrutinised. That’s part of the job.”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
How about reducing the amount the taxpayer pays to keep the royal family. They have permanent fully staffed residences all over the country even when not occupied by royals. These people have enough cash to keep themselves for generations. Get rid of the costly Lords who contribute almost nothing to society. Also, how about freezing the wage bill of politicians for 10 years and stop taxpayer subsidised restaurants and bars within Westminster. Make them all finance their own pensions too. There are many ways to raise money without constantly hitting pensioners, disabled and working man. Look for cash closer to… Read more »
I think royal family is about 80 million and HoL about 100 million per year to run. Even if we scrapped both, that represents a saving of less than 0.15% of the UK Fiscal deficit. The scale of the current UK deficit is enormous
There are lots and lots of things the Chancellor could make cuts to but she chooses to give them a wide berth. Goodness gracious she cannot possibly hit the landed gentry, billionaires and especially the royals who could award her a title in the future, eh!! The examples you have given may look small individually but when they are all added up together could make a substantial contribution and would ease the constant pressure on the taxpayer.
Can’t get your medicine and voted for Brexit,
Oh dear, perhaps the lady above could help…
If you voted Remain, hard cheese…
Just tax then eh Rachel?
Someone’s got to pay for the Cost of Cons crisis.
Since the UK government sold all their assets they now have no incomes from dividends from those assets. Perhaps, If the governments (Welsh and UK) didn’t dispose of those assets we would still have the dividends and therefore would not need to over-tax ordinary people on average incomes so much. The strength of the Deutschland economy is that they never disposed of their assets. They still own a sizable share of their main vehicle manufacturers both at federal and regional lander levels. The government of Norway own 67% of their greatest asset Equinor (Statoil oil, gas and renewables). As an… Read more »
You’re spot on there. The UK is a greedy nation. They would sell their grandmother if they could.