Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Chancellor should raise taxes not cut spending to meet fiscal rules – think tank

17 Mar 2025 3 minute read
Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves. Photo Peter Byrne/PA Wire

The Chancellor should increase taxes instead of cutting welfare to balance the books when she delivers her spring statement at the end of the month, a leading think tank has said.

Rachel Reeves is set to update her fiscal plans on March 26 against the background of a faltering economy and drastically reduced headroom against the debt rules she set herself in October.

According to a report from the Resolution Foundation published on Monday, she will need to find around £4.4 billion to meet her target of ensuring day-to-day spending is paid for with tax rather than borrowing, thanks to a combination of weak growth and higher interest rates.

Raising taxes

Two options for achieving that aim are imposing deeper cuts on Government departments, or cutting disability and sickness benefits – something she is reported to be considering.

But the Resolution Foundation urged her to look at raising taxes instead, saying extending the freeze on personal tax thresholds for another two years would raise £8 billion.

The think tank added this would also avoid harming living standards in the short term, as thresholds are already frozen until 2028, and mean 80% of the extra revenue came from the richest half of households.

Conversely, the report said raising the threshold for qualifying for personal independence payment (PIP), the main disability benefit, would raise £5 billion but focus cuts on the poorest half of families.

James Smith, research director at the Resolution Foundation, said: “The Chancellor must act decisively to meet her fiscal rules. But with the jobs market in recession territory, lower income households shouldn’t bear the brunt of any consolidation.

“Crucially, she should avoid turning the spring statement into a ‘sticking plaster’ budget, with long-term thinking on welfare reform undermined by the quest for short-term savings that could cause real harm.

“And with Britain’s fiscal pressures more likely to intensify rather than fade away, continuing to rule out tax rises is going to make future budgets even more challenging to deliver.”

Sticking plaster politics

During the election, Sir Keir Starmer spoke out against what he called “sticking plaster politics” that had seen government focus too much on short-term solutions to long-term problems.

But Labour also promised not to increase taxes on “working people”, specifically income tax, national insurance or VAT.

The Chancellor also chose to use her budget in October last year to confirm that the freeze on personal tax thresholds, introduced under the Conservatives in 2021, would end as schedule in 2028, saying extending it would “hurt working people”.

She added: “I am keeping every single promise on tax that I made in our manifesto.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest


18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
30 days ago

A flock of Seagulls for a government…

Stealing the chips off the casualty list of 15 years of bad government…

Fat Shanks to Clark of Kent “there is a bit of marrow left in their bones see if you can get at it”…

Last edited 30 days ago by Mab Meirion
Hogyn y Gogledd
Hogyn y Gogledd
30 days ago

I have two words to say to Reeves and to Starmer: TAX WEALTH!

Mark
Mark
30 days ago

…and watch the wealth evaporate. The wealthy are mobile people, and their wealth is even more mobile. Many of the super-rich have left the country over the last twelve months, and those that are left have moved most of their wealth beyond the chancellor’s reach. If the government start talking about a wealth tax, that will only accelerate.
“Tax the rich” is a great sound-bite, but it is not going to generate a meaningful amount of tax. Mind you, one of our Celtic neighbours, Manx, will benefit greatly.

Hogyn y Gogledd
Hogyn y Gogledd
30 days ago
Reply to  Mark

Funny how so much wealth is hidden in UK and its off-sdhorwe tax havens by Russians, Saudis and the rest.

I think one percent on over-ten-million would still be very attractive.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
30 days ago

Mrs ‘More Free Tickets’ Bumble and Clark are just another ‘Firm’ following in the footsteps of Fat Shanks and not a government for the people…

Just a new front for the old Robber Barons of England…

Frank
Frank
30 days ago

If we were all rich we could avoid paying tax.

hdavies15
hdavies15
30 days ago
Reply to  Frank

You can say that again !

Frank
Frank
30 days ago

If were all rich we could avoid paying tax.

hdavies15
hdavies15
30 days ago
Reply to  Frank

Oh, you did !

Frank
Frank
30 days ago
Reply to  hdavies15

😅👍

Bert
Bert
30 days ago

Start by abolishing the NI discount enjoyed by those earning over £50k.

Howie
Howie
30 days ago

A socialist think tank saying extend thresholds does not take into account the fiscal drag of more low income people being brought into the tax regime as well putting some into the 40% bracket that were never envisaged to be there, although inflation has eroded their income buying power.
Just got my 7.85% risen council tax bill plus higher energy costs to contend with as well.

hdavies15
hdavies15
30 days ago
Reply to  Howie

The fat cats will be well looked after. Rachel and the Labour crew are so fixated about protecting the ultra wealthy they can’t even begin to concede that they are hitting the wrong segment of the tax-paying public. They need to plug loopholes, cut scope for scamming and rethink the taxation rates applying to higher earnings for starters. Then do some real research on how to address taxing of wealth as there may be lots of grey areas on valuations etc.

Y Cymro
Y Cymro
30 days ago

Reform UK (cough) I mean , UK Labour, silly me, easy mistake to make, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves could tax the rich but she opts the hit the poor because it’s easier to lean on ones at the bottom of the social ladder as the idle rich are transient and the those in poverty rooted. Populist Keir Starmer’s Labour government has zero concern for those on benefits , especially ones on PIP, in which sadly the largest recipients are in Wales. As usual we are lumped in with England being around 3.6 million claimants combined. Labour has always… Read more »

Mark
Mark
30 days ago

Raising taxes is not the answer. We are already paying the highest taxes in living memory, yet the NHS is a shambles, education is a joke, the military is a shadow of its former self, the police are only interested in violent crime and traffic offences. The problem is not a lack of cash, it is profligate waste across all layers of government, and in all public services. It is a mind-set problem where people spending other people’s money don’t give a damn how much they spend. This is true of government ministers (Cardiff & Westminster), waste at the institutional… Read more »

Hogyn y Gogledd
Hogyn y Gogledd
30 days ago
Reply to  Mark

Our taxes are much lower than those in civilised countries like those in Scandinavia (plus Finland, of course). And the services we get in return are also much lower.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
30 days ago

Cruelty refined, Sadism promoted and personal relationships exploited beyond linked in

Wedded in…joined at the Altar…the new Aristocracy…

Charles Coombes
Charles Coombes
29 days ago

2% tax on the richest.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.