Council struggling to fund maintenance of Active Travel routes
Richard Youle, local democracy reporter
A council is struggling to fund the maintenance of Active Travel routes used by cyclists and others, although doing so is its responsibility.
Swansea Councillors were briefed on the situation at a committee meeting, and heard that third-party claims had been paid out due to defects on the county’s 91-mile network of paths.
Every year local authorities bid for Welsh Government money to build Active Travel schemes – designed to keep people active and reduce car journeys – and Swansea has been successful in this regard.
Maintenance
The guidance accompanying the Active Travel Act says maintenance should be considered as part of a route’s design, and that doing so was “particularly important” as upkeep costs had to come from councils’ existing budgets. This aspect of Active Travel appeared to surprise some councillors on the council’s economy and infrastructure service transformation committee when they met on October 24.
The report before the committee said “reactive” Active Travel maintenance was carried out by highways staff and parks staff in Swansea despite limited resources. The cost of repairing damage on just one route, it said, could swallow up the entire highways element of the maintenance budget although no figures were given. The parks element of the Active Travel maintenance budget was estimated to be £100,000 per year and rising.
Tree roots and repeated surface water flooding can damage cycle paths, and brambles, overhanging branches and fallen trees can encroach.
Mapping
The report said only adopted rather than unadopted routes were maintained and routinely inspected.
Mapping of routes was also cited as an issue, although this is being rectified. Unadopted routes are also to be adopted.
The report concluded: “It may be beneficial to estimate the additional funding required to maintain any new infrastructure at the time of securing funding for the scheme, and to be mindful of maintenance costs when designing and planning new routes to minimise those costs.”
Cllr Robert Francis-Davies, cabinet member for investment, regeneration, events and tourism, said maintenance was important but that years of UK Government budget cuts had impacted the council’s finances. “I think we need to have a policy that when we apply for Active Travel routes we make sure there is a maintenance budget built into it,” he said.
Cllr Francis-Davies said 40% of visitors to Gower came for the cycling. “Everyone wants to see more Active Travel routes,” he said.
‘Astounding’
Cllr Andrew Stevens, whose cabinet brief includes transport, said other councils were grappling with Active Travel maintenance costs. Cllr Paul Lloyd said he was “astounded” that Welsh Government funding didn’t include these costs, while Cllr Will Thomas suggested businesses like the Secret Beach Bar and Kitchen on the prom whose trade was boosted by cyclists and walkers could perhaps contribute.
Report author and Active Travel officer Stephen Williams said the council would bid for another round of Active Travel funding in December. He also said that serious accidents on Mayals Road – the site of a controversial cycle path scheme three years ago – had fallen.
Last month the council suspended an Active Travel project planned from Sketty, through Uplands and along Walter Road, despite having been awarded £2.55 million for it. The reasons for doing so, it said, were policy and priority changes by new administrations in Westminster and Cardiff on economic growth and public transport, along with feedback from local business and residents. It does not mean the scheme is scrapped.
Cyclist Steve Colinese, of Gorseinon, said the council had done a good job in rectifying tree root damage on sections of the Active Travel route between Gowerton and Pontarddulais. “In fairness they have done that,” he said.
Mr Colinese, who is a member of national governing body British Cycling, said he understood that an uneven stretch on the cycle path between Gowerton and Dunvant was on the council’s maintenance schedule. He also called for a cycle link planned from Fairwood Terrace, Gowerton, through woodland to the nearby train station to be completed as soon as possible.
A spokesman for Swansea Bay cycle campaign group Wheelrights said the older the path the worse its condition generally. He described much of Active Travel network in the Enterprise Zone and also the Penclawdd end of the North Gower route as very poor. He added: “On a positive note the council have been clearing the foreshore path fairly regularly.”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Maybe cyclists should start paying a road and cycling track tax.
We do it’s called council tax and income tax. Same things that fixes roads local and trunk. Try educating yourself. Your road tax doesn’t exist since the 1930s.
Most people who pay road tax also pay council tax and income tax. Cyclists are now a privileged protected species often displaying extremely bad manners especially towards pedestrians.
Road tax doesn’t exist. Vex is a pollution tax that makes little money. And cars destroys roads and pavements they park on much quicker than a bit of weeding and fallen tree on a cycle path
If Councils can’t afford to keep them open then some must close. Simple. We can’t afford everything – Councils need to be aware of the difference between its crucial tasks (rubbish collecting for one example) and ‘nice to have things.’ ‘Nice to have things’ need to go in this economic climate.
Commuter routes must close, forcing us onto the normal roads with greater danger in darker winter days. Plus these routes are regular exercise for so many.
You have a point and it should start with roads. All roads should be urgently assessed by councils for value for money and all unprofitable ones should be closed and reverted to a dirt track or converted to an urban rainforest.
They want to adopt more routes but can’t afford to maintain the ones they currently are responsible for. Classic comedy.
You must be all Townies and stupid with it, money to burn on an idea without spending a minute on due diligence, then think of another one, just like all that EU money…
15 years of austerity means that maintenance is now a luxury and despite austerity government debt is larger than ever. The small state neoliberal theory imploded. Start anew.
“…..despite austerity government debt is larger than ever.” No surprises there. On the one hand austerity was inflicted with enthusiasm by the London regime and its little helpers, then they spent money on defective pet projects, dubious military ventures and multiple £billion vanity projects thus wiping out any alleged benefit that might have accrued from that bout of management by symbolic misery. Very evident malicious intent
That’s not why debt didn’t drop. What so many struggle with is just how much of GDP is government spending – it’s about 45%. If you stop that spending, GDP drops and debt as a share of GDP increases even as it’s paid down. That’s why Liz labelled her own side as the anti-growth coalition because they literally shrunk the economy in pursuit of their own misguided ideology.