Couple fear losing campsite business over planning breach

Richard Youle, local democracy reporter
A couple who ploughed their savings into a farmhouse and campsite have been told to demolish the toilet and shower block, reception building and glamping pods.
Bonnie Fisher and Shane O’Neill, who live in the farmhouse, said they would have to close Church House Farm Getaways, near Carmarthen, if this happened.
They bought the farmhouse and caravan and campsite in 2021 and went on to replace the existing toilet and shower facilities and construct a new reception building, spending tens of thousands of pounds in the process.
“This is our retirement project,” said Mrs Fisher. “We sold my house, we sold Shane’s house, and we sold a jointly-owned cottage which we’d renovated to buy this place.
“We’ve got no plans to enlarge it. Visitors always get a good welcome. We like to see people come and enjoy themselves.”
Certification
The site, in the village of Llangain, has long-standing certification by the Caravan and Motorhome Club for five caravans, motorhomes or trailer tents, but it has expanded including the addition of three glamping pods, which pre-dated the couple’s purchase.
Carmarthenshire Council has previously raised concerns about this expansion and refused a planning application in 2006 by the previous owners to change the use of land for 30 touring pitches and build a toilet and shower block on highway safety and other grounds. The council had, however, granted temporary permission for a portable toilet block for two years in 2004.
Mrs Fisher and Mr O’Neill said the caravan and campsite currently had 29 pitches and that they hadn’t realised they should have applied for planning permission for the toilet and shower block and reception building. They did apply retrospectively as some of the work had already been done but it was turned down, with the council saying the site was largely unauthorised.
The couple also applied to the council for what’s known as a certificate of lawfulness for the three glamping pods. This was also refused.
Enforcement notice
In March this year the council issued an enforcement notice to the couple requiring them to remove the glamping pods, toilet and shower block and reception building, and cease the use of the land as a caravan and campsite – except for the area that had been certified by Caravan and Motorhome Club.
Mrs Fisher and Mr O’Neill appealed but only on one ground, namely that the three-month deadline to comply should be extended to a year.
Their planning agents acknowledged in their submission to Planning and Environment Decisions Wales – formerly the planning inspectorate – that a planning breach had occurred on the land.
But they argued there was strong evidence to suggest that the expansion of the caravan and campsite could be lawful because of how long it had been operating as such. They also felt any highway issues could be resolved and contended that the council’s current planning policy “takes a more positive approach” to tourism development.
The agents urged the planning inspector to extend the deadline so they could draw up a certificate of lawfulness application or other planning applications to the council, but the inspector turned the appeal down, saying three months was reasonable and that extending it to 12 months “would considerably prolong the identified public harm”.
Stressful
Mrs Fisher, a nurse who runs a private aesthetics clinic in Swansea two days a week as well as running the campsite, said the situation has been very stressful. She and Mr O’Neill, a retired builder who maintains the campsite and works on the farmhouse when he can, said they employed a part-time groundsman, cleaner and reception building worker.
Mrs Fisher, 53, said their planning agents would soon be submitting a certificate of lawfulness application to the council given what they contend has been its historic wider use. Their hope is that, if granted, the toilet and shower block, reception building and glamping pods could also be retained.
Asked what would happen if it was turned down, Mrs Fisher said: “We would appeal it. If that decision was upheld we would have to close it (the site) down.”
Church House Farm Getaways has won awards in recent years and some people living nearby have backed the couple in their planning battle, saying the site was well run, an asset to Carmarthenshire, and that steps were taken to ensure a free flow of traffic when caravans arrived.
Mrs Fisher said a council tourism officer visited the site a while back and, based on booking numbers and other data, had estimated it was worth £2.6 million in visitor spend to the wider economy.
Another local person supported the council’s enforcement action and felt “total disregard” had been shown for the planning process.
Planning history
Asked if they had fully explored the planning history of the site when they purchased it in 2021, Mrs Fisher said: “Not that I remember. We didn’t delve into it. I think at that point we were just eager to move in.”
She added: “We’re not having a go at the council. The last thing we want to do is point the finger of blame.”
Asked to comment on the situation, a spokeswoman for the council said: “As the local planning authority, Carmarthenshire Council does not condone unauthorised development and will use its full range of powers to seek to regularise development in the public interest.”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


I would have thought that anyone building would be aware of planning regs. Or should be aware. That is before you shell out, you check, and check again.
Agree completely. Why do so many people take on businesses but don’t check with planning what they can or can’t do!
Depending on the basis on which it was purchased they may have a case against their solicitor or previous owner. There is an awful lot of this stuff going on both here and in Ireland.
They should have got advice from Cardiff Council as they seem to flout planning laws when it suits them.
The illegal planning and buildings in past that was in place should have been raised by LA in the searches on sale of site.
Their solicitor and vendors solicitor has some questions to answer as well I would have thought.
I’d have thought that checking the detail of the scope of the current relevant planning permission with the council would be a natural routine precaution which a prospective purchaser would take care to do – and all the more so if they hadn’t previously run a business of this sort. They could also get preliminary outline advice around the planning implications of any alterations to the business that they were contemplating making.
Another couple who think the rules only apply to other people. Don’t believe they didn’t check. The council provides an interactive planning map. Put the cursor on your land or property and right click, shows the full planning history. This is just an entitled couple gaming the system.
Maybe but I hardly think the site is causing any harm