Support our Nation today - please donate here

Equalities watchdog warns that plan to allow any Senedd candidate to self-identify as a woman is unlawful

18 Apr 2024 5 minute read
Image: Senedd Cymru

Martin Shipton

The UK’s equalities watchdog has warned the Welsh Government that it does not have the power to allow anyone to self-identify with their chosen gender at Senedd elections.

As part of its Senedd reform agenda, the Welsh Government plans to legislate to ensure the body is gender balanced by law following the next election in 2026. This would be achieved by introducing a mechanism aimed at electing 50% of MSs who are female and 50% who are male.

One clause of the Bill would allow any candidate to self-identify as a woman, regardless of their legal sex.

Now, however, the interim chief executive of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has written to the Senedd committee scrutinising the Bill to say that the way the self-identifying clause has been drafted is likely to be unlawful.

Unique powers

The letter from John Kirkpatrick states: “The EHRC has been given powers by Parliament to advise governments on the equality and human rights implications of laws and proposed laws and to publish information or provide advice, including to the Senedd on any matter related to equality, diversity and human rights.

“We enforce the Equality Act 2010 and have unique powers to investigate when the law isn’t followed.

“We welcome the opportunity to respond to the Committee’s consultation on the Senedd Cymru (Electoral Candidate Lists) Bill (the Bill). Given the tight timescale of the consultation period, we are unable to respond in full and we would be keen to engage with the Committee/s as the Bill progresses.

“Tabled by the Welsh Government, following the Special Purpose Committee on Senedd Reform’s recommendations, The Senedd Cymru (Electoral Candidate Lists) Bill’s Explanatory Memorandum clarified that ‘The Bill will introduce integrated statutory gender quotas’ and ‘the Bill aims to ensure the Senedd is broadly representative of the gender make-up of the population”.

“We would draw the Committees attention to s104 – Selection of Candidates of the Act. This allows a political party to tackle a lack of diversity among its elected representatives by putting in place selection processes that will help to address the under-representation of people who share a protected characteristic as set out in the Act.

“We previously engaged with the Special Purpose Committee on Senedd Reform and provided written and oral evidence in early 2022. We clarified that in relation to addressing the under-representation of women, the relevant protected characteristic in the Act is sex, not gender. As defined in s11 (a) a reference to a person who has a particular protected characteristic is a reference to a man or to a woman

“The protected characteristic of ‘sex’ refers to a person’s legal sex, as stated on their birth certificate or as acquired through obtaining a Gender Recognition Certificate. Further to our evidence, the Scottish Court of Session Inner House gave judgment in a case which determined that ‘sex’, for the purposes of the Act, is not determined by ’self-identification’.

“Whilst it is to be noted that Scottish judgments are not binding on courts in England and Wales and that the judgment is currently under appeal to the Supreme Court, we consider it the leading authority on the point.

“The Explanatory Memorandum mentions the term ‘sex’ once and this is to reference the protected characteristic as set out above. Gender is otherwise the term used throughout. Whilst the Bill itself refers to ‘women,’ which is consistent with the terminology of the Act, the repeated use of ‘gender’ throughout the Explanatory Memorandum may give rise to confusion about how this is defined and may lead to inconsistency with the principles of the Act.

“In particular, we are concerned that the Bill appears to base eligibility for inclusion on the quota list, on candidates’ declarations of whether or not they are a woman, and this in conjunction with the term ‘gender’ may be insufficiently clear. In short, it may lead to the inclusion of quotas based on a person’s self identified gender as opposed to their legal sex, and may therefore be inconsistent with the Act.

“We were encouraged that an Equality Impact Assessment accompanied the Bill. However, there is a lack of detail as to why gender was used as a term rather than sex, and a lack of analysis of the potential impacts of this. It is unclear how the proposed ‘gender statements’ would work in practice. If they mean self-identified gender, this is unlikely to be lawful as not all those who self identify as women will be considered to legally be so under the Act. If ‘gender statements’ refer to a statement of one’s legal sex this should be made clear.”

‘Lack of understanding’

The letter concludes: “The provisions in this proposed legislation that concern us as the regulator of the Act may have arisen from a lack of understanding of the Act. We strongly recommend that the Reform Bill Committee engages with the Commission so that we may assist in clarifying how the Act applies in the context of this Bill.”

Gender critical women’s groups in Wales have indicated that they would pursue legal action aimed at blocking any move to allow trans women without a Gender Recognition Certificate.

While Elin Jones, the Llywydd (Presiding Officer) of the Senedd, has stated that she does not consider the Bill to be within the Senedd’s competence because equality legislation is reserved to the UK Parliament, the Welsh Government maintains it has received legal advice that its proposal is lawful.

Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
25 days ago

I cañnot understand why politicians are obsessed with the right of men to self ID as women but dont give a step up to those women who ID as men? Level playing field for all surely or how about we keep it about the best candidate whatever they SELF iD as. Of course we won’t bè able to do this under closed list system. But if I were a Self ID man who wanted a career as an AM couldn’t i then challenge them with sex discrimination, as self IDing men seem to be excluded. If the Senedd is not… Read more »

24 days ago
Reply to  Gaynor

Because transgender men can’t be used in the usual anti-trans — oops, sorry, I meant “gender critical” — scare story narratives. When a transgender man uses the men’s toilets that’s fine – many cis men have probably used the men’s toilets at the same time as a trans man without even realising it. But a trans woman using the women’s toilets is a predator who wants to prey on women and invade women-only spaces. Many cis women have probably also used the women’s toilets at the same time as a trans woman and been none the wiser… but that doesn’t… Read more »

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.