Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Farming leaders’ fury as Treasury stands firm on inheritance tax change

18 Feb 2025 6 minute read
FUW President Ian Rickman

Agricultural leaders left a meeting with the Treasury with “boiling blood” after the UK Government faced down their arguments to rethink proposed changes to inheritance tax on farms.

Ministers stood firm on proposals to introduce a 20% inheritance tax rate on agricultural land and businesses worth more than £1 million, essentially scrapping an exemption which meant no tax was paid to pass down family farms.

The plans continue to face intense opposition from the sector, which says cash-poor, asset-rich farmers will be forced to sell their land, investment will stall, and the families of elderly or vulnerable farmers who do not have time for succession planning will be the most affected.

Despite ongoing farmer protests, Labour has insisted it will not reconsider the proposed changes, which are due to come into force from April 2026.

‘Deeply disappointed’

Following the meeting, Farmers’ Union of Wales (FUW) President, Ian Rickman said: “We are deeply disappointed by the Treasury’s dismissive response to our compelling case against the detrimental impact of the Inheritance Tax changes for Welsh family farms.

“Together with other UK farming unions, we clearly outlined the potential economic, emotional and cultural devastation these changes could inflict on farms and rural communities across Wales, and our domestic food production. Crucially, we offered our willingness to collaborate with the government and industry stakeholders to address the flaws in this ill-thought-out policy.

“Regrettably, it seems these arguments have fallen on deaf ears. Serious questions remain about the Treasury’s own figures and given steep trajectories in land prices and the current and historically low farm profits for the farm types which predominate in Wales, such inheritance tax bills would be unaffordable for a significant proportion of family farms. We continue to hold grave concerns about these changes and will liaise further with our membership regarding the best way forward.”

‘Really cross’

NFU president Tom Bradshaw told reporters that the group of representatives were “really cross today”.

He said the Government showed “no movement” on the policy after they outlined their concerns and put forward solutions.

“The Government resolutely believe that they are correct and that they are generous in the exemptions they are giving us,” he said.

“They don’t care about the human impact. They don’t care about the intergenerational impact. They don’t care about the impact on tenant farmers and the geopolitical situation that the world faces today.”

Mr Bradshaw said the Government rebuffed proposed suggestion for a “clawback” mechanism, which would ensure farms face tax charges only when assets are sold.

“The door is shut from the Treasury,” he said before adding: “The reaction from our members is going to be one of fury, one of real anger, one of desperation that we’ve seen over recent months and it’s what we all feel here today.”

Sector representatives have already spoken with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer among other officials to discuss the dispute but Tuesday marked the first time they met with the Treasury.

‘Arrogance’

Afterwards, they criticised Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who is still yet to meet them, claiming she has displayed “arrogance” in not seeking to justify the policy herself since she announced it in the Budget.

“If the Chancellor believes this policy is right, if the Chancellor is willing to own the outcomes of this policy, if the Chancellor is willing to run down our rural economies, to risk the future of domestic food production, then the Chancellor should look us in the eyes and tell us that she’s right,” Mr Bradshaw said.

“I don’t think we know what to do next, quite genuinely,” he added.

“We’ve done our best to try and work with Government. We’ve gone in there today offering a solution and yet they’re saying: ‘No, we are right’ without any comprehension of how the industry really works”.

The NFU president said they will nonetheless work to gather political support for a vote against the Finance Bill expected in autumn, focusing on bringing backbench MPs onside.

“Now I’m not underestimating the scale of that challenge, but when we think the impacts on our industry are as potentially damaging as we do, we’re not just simply going to go away because they’ve said no again,” he said.

The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats immediately sought to throw their support behind the industry as they criticised the Government’s unwillingness to budge.

‘Damage’

Shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said: “The Government has been endlessly warned of the economic and emotional damage their family farm tax is having across the countryside, but once again they’ve arrogantly ignored the warnings and stuck pig-headedly to their ideological dogma.”

Liberal Democrat environment spokesman Tim Farron said the Government is “throwing farmers to the wolves” before describing the tax as potentially the “final nail in the coffin for many communities struggling to cope”.

Ann Davies MP, Plaid Cymru Agriculture Spokesperson said: “Labour’s refusal to listen shows they simply don’t care about Welsh farming. The UK Government’s approach ignores the reality of family-run, cash-poor but land-rich farms that are now at risk. Plaid Cymru is calling for a Wales-specific impact assessment because our farmers deserve policies that reflect their needs.”

A Government spokesperson said: “We regularly meet representatives of the farming industry to listen to their views, but strongly believe this is a fair and balanced approach which helps fix the public services we all rely on.

“Our reforms to Agricultural and Business Property Relief will mean three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free.

“We are also investing £5 billion into farming over the next two years, the largest amount for sustainable food production in our country’s history, and are going further with reforms to boost profits for farmers by backing British produce and reforming planning rules on farms to support food production.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John
John
15 hours ago

One of the issues I have with NFU has been their lack of proposals for alternative solutions. There are quite obvious challenges – especially for elderly farmers that they should be vocal about, and the vast majority of public would be sympathetic for. It is also surprising they aren’t distancing themselves more from the millionaire tax dodgers. I suspect the latter, combined with their lack of willingness to suggest concessions, has seriously annoyed the treasury. But it’s nice to see they have suggested something – ‘clawback’ – but this is probably a non starter as this is being abused and… Read more »

John Ellis
John Ellis
10 hours ago

My initial – and quite genuine – sympathy for the farming unions, given that for most small farmers their industry is neither a secure or a lucrative one, has been enormously dissipated by the readiness of the NFU to let their campaign be serially fronted by that pair of gilded grifters Jeremy Clarkson and Nigel Farage.

If that’s the company which they’re choosing to enlist, my instinct is to shift towards suggesting that they stop whingeing and take the hit. Which, after all, is all that the rest of us have to do when any government introduces new taxes.

hdavies15
hdavies15
20 minutes ago
Reply to  John Ellis

Compared to us punters whose land assets amounts to about 50 sq.metres around the house I’d say that their deal on inheritance tax settlement is a fairly soft blow. That deal is driven partly by the recognition that the mainstream farm is not usually a cash rich business. If it contains unfair elements, as opposed to unpalatable, then there should be a better effort at highlighting those so that amendments could be drafted.

John Ellis
John Ellis
4 minutes ago
Reply to  hdavies15

I pretty much agree. And in your final sentence I think that you make a sensible and constructive suggestion.

Last edited 3 minutes ago by John Ellis

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.