Gove accused of ‘dangerous con trick’ after admitting Brexit’s impact on Holyhead not assessed

Delyth Jewell and Michael Gove. Picture by Senedd TV.

UK Government Cabinet member Michael Gove has been accused of a “dangerous con trick” after admitting that no impact assessment has been carried out on the Brexit deal’s effect on Holyhead port, the UK’s second largest.

The most recent version of the Brexit deal would effectively create a hard border in the Irish Sea, potentially causing disruption at what is the UK’s second busiest port.

Michael Gove was questioned by Plaid Cymru Assembly Member Delyth Jewell while giving evidence to the Senedd’s External Affairs and Additional Legislation Committee this afternoon.

Delyth Jewell had asked how AMs could be expected to back the deal without knowing the impact on the port, which has over 400,000 lorries passing through it every year.

“It’s difficult to have an impact assessment because there are so many variables in play and I always remember the words of the economist JK Galbraith who said that economic forecasting was invented in order to give astrology a good name,” Michael Gove said.

“It’s important of course for all of us to look at the variety of different factors but no impact assessment can ever give us the unvarnished truth because by definition it is impossible to predict with certainty how something as multi-faceted as the UK economy will grow and develop in the future.”

Mr Gove then suggested that Holyhead would prosper under the deal, saying that if the deal were passed, Holyhead would be in a “stronger position than ever”.

 

‘Bumbling’

Plaid Cymru’s parliamentary candidate for Ynys Môn Aled ap Dafydd said his words amounted to a “dangerous con trick”.

“Michael Gove has confirmed what we have long suspected,” he said. “The UK Government has made no assessment of the impact of this deal on the UK’s second busiest port.

“Over 600 workers at Holyhead and in communities surrounding the town want to know what the effect of a border in the Irish Sea would have on their livelihoods.

“It is a dangerous con trick for this Conservative government to argue that Holyhead would be ‘better off’ without backing it up with evidence.

“The people of Ynys Môn will not be fooled by a bumbling minister who is full of empty rhetoric.”

Articles via Email

Get instant updates to your inbox

3
Leave a Reply

avatar
2 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
3 Comment authors
PenderynCharles L. GallagherAlwyn Evans Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Alwyn Evans
Guest
Alwyn Evans

There WILL be more work in some fields – since they’ll need more customs officers, – but the negative effect of diverted traffic avoiding Uk to access EU direct, slower embarkation, more red tape and lorries queuing the length of Anglesey will have a much more negative effect.
They’ve already carried out a major impact assessment and exercises to test the effect on Dover – but Holyhead’s only in Wales so obviously isn’t important. What a bunch of selfish incompetent, self-satisfied buffoons!

Charles L. Gallagher
Guest
Charles L. Gallagher

Hi Alyn,

Irish traffic already by-passing Wales on their new super ferry sailing from Dublin directly into EU. In Scotland, we envisage one long lorry-jam from Stranraer back to the English Border and it’s a shocking ‘A’ road so you’re not alone in being side-lined.

C

Penderyn
Guest
Penderyn

Would be nice if Nation.Cymru respected the Welsh native spelling of places …. Caergybi / Holyhead could suffice. Diolch