Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

House of Lords to face ‘immediate modernisation’ under a Labour government

13 Jun 2024 4 minute read
The Palace of Westminster, which contains the House of Commons and the House of Lords.Photo Stefan Rousseau/PA Wire

Labour has pledged “immediate modernisation” of the House of Lords although the party put no timeframe on Sir Keir Starmer’s long-held ambition to abolish the unelected chamber.

A mandatory retirement age of 80, the removal of hereditary peers and a new participation requirement would be introduced in the first term of a Labour government, according to the party’s manifesto.

In December 2022, Labour leader Sir Keir said he would abolish the “indefensible” House of Lords “as quickly as possible”, ideally within the first term of government, and replace it with an elected chamber.

Alternative second chamber

The manifesto states Labour is “committed” to replacing the Lords with an “alternative second chamber that is more representative of the regions and nations”, adding it will consult the public on this.

There are 92 hereditary places reserved in the Lords, following reforms under the previous Labour administration in 1999.

But the system has faced widespread criticism given the exclusive, male-dominated list of eligible candidates and the usually limited number of people able to vote in the contests.

Labour’s Lord Grocott, 83, has led a long campaign to end “idiotic” by-elections used to replace hereditaries who have died or resigned.

Lord Bethell, who won a seat in the upper chamber after securing 26 of the 43 votes cast by fellow Conservatives with inherited titles, said throwing out existing hereditary peers would be “harsh”.

In total, there are 785 peers in the Lords and a mechanism does exist to allow them to voluntarily retire although there is no formal retirement age.

‘Reform is long overdue’

Labour’s manifesto states: “Although Labour recognises the good work of many peers who scrutinise the government and improve the quality of legislation passed in Parliament, reform is long overdue and essential.

“Too many peers do not play a proper role in our democracy. Hereditary peers remain indefensible. And because appointments are for life, the second chamber of Parliament has become too big.

“The next Labour government will therefore bring about an immediate modernisation, by introducing legislation to remove the right of hereditary peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords.

“Labour will also introduce a mandatory retirement age. At the end of the Parliament in which a member reaches 80 years of age, they will be required to retire from the House of Lords.”

The manifesto adds: “Labour will ensure all peers meet the high standards the public expect of them, and we will introduce a new participation requirement as well as strengthening the circumstances in which disgraced members can be removed.

“We will reform the appointments process to ensure the quality of new appointments and will seek to improve the national and regional balance of the second chamber.

“Whilst this action to modernise the House of Lords will be an improvement, Labour is committed to replacing the House of Lords with an alternative second chamber that is more representative of the regions and nations.

“Labour will consult on proposals, seeking the input of the British public on how politics can best serve them.”

Conservative former health minister Lord Bethell told Sky News: “Getting rid of the principle of new hereditary peers, so for my poor old son Jacob, the chance he may have to run for election one day, that has been a longstanding commitment by Labour and if that was in the manifesto that wouldn’t come as a huge surprise to anyone.

“But throwing out the people who have committed a lot to the House of Lords, and who by the way contribute an enormous amount (to) – despite what anyone says – a very successful second chamber, would be harsh and would be I think quite political and a bit of a blame game.

“If the Labour party want to reform the House of Lords top to bottom then good luck to them, they should embark on that project.

“But to single out one group of peers for special treatment on the basis of some kind of class prejudice would be a shame, and would mean that some good people – not necessarily myself – but some really good people from the hereditary benches would lose out.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Geraint
Geraint
1 month ago

If they are that good as Bethel suggests, I’m sure they could stand on their record for election to a modern slimmed down, representative HoL.

Fi yn unig
Fi yn unig
1 month ago

Keir Starmer last night twice referred to our ‘four nations’ and as said many times previously, the House of Lords should represent the ‘nations and regions’. This is an encouraging sign of proper recognition of OUR nation.

David
David
1 month ago
Reply to  Fi yn unig

Beware of the man who speaks with forked tongue.

Mawkernewek
1 month ago
Reply to  Fi yn unig

Not if you’re Cornish it doesn’t. The phrase ‘nations and regions’ could also be used to downgrade the status of the devolved nations toward the status of a region.

SundanceKid
SundanceKid
1 month ago
Reply to  Fi yn unig

The caveat is in the word “region”.

Paddy
Paddy
1 month ago

Bethel turns logic on its head: he says it’s class prejudice to end class entitlement.

Paddy
Paddy
1 month ago

No democracy would tolerate anything resembling the House of Lords.

Mawkernewek
1 month ago

This is a misleading headline. The manifesto promises just a bit of tinkering and still a wholly appointed house not elected. A mandatory retirement age would clear out old cronies to make way for newly appointed ones.

SundanceKid
SundanceKid
1 month ago
Reply to  Mawkernewek

Yes, and the replacements would all be of a Labour persuasion.

A.Redman
A.Redman
1 month ago
Reply to  SundanceKid

What is the political demographic in the last twenty years?

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.