Support our Nation today - please donate here

Hunt warns against fuelling inflation but hints at tax cuts for businesses

19 Nov 2023 4 minute read
Chancellor of the Exchequer Jeremy Hunt speaks to the media after appearing on the BBC One’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. James Manning/PA Wire

Jeremy Hunt has heightened expectations that he will cut taxes on businesses in a bid to boost growth with his autumn statement but downplayed chances of reducing income tax.

The Chancellor persistently warned against changes that could fuel inflation, dampening speculation that income tax or national insurance could be reduced.

He suggested during a round of broadcast interviews ahead of Wednesday’s financial package that the personal tax burden will not come down “overnight” as he seeks to avoid prices spiralling again.

Mr Hunt made clear that his “priority is backing British business” after promising an “autumn statement for growth”.

Rachel Reeves, his Labour shadow, warned cutting inheritance tax during a cost-of-living crisis would be wrong amid some Tory unease over the possible move.

She also warned against the “gradual erosion of people’s incomes” if Mr Hunt goes ahead and squeezes billions from benefits payments, as has been under consideration.

‘Fizzing economy’

Mr Hunt declared he wants to “bring down our tax burden” as he presented a positive tone after a year of urging restraint while battling to halve the rate of inflation.

“I think it’s important for a productive, dynamic, fizzing economy that you motivate people to do the work, to take the risks that we need,” he told Sky’s Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips.

He did not rule out any specific changes, including most controversially to inheritance tax, saying “everything is on the table in an autumn statement”.

He stressed that “lower tax is essential to economic growth”.

The Chancellor made clear to Times Radio that his “priority is backing British business” and changes that “unlock growth”.

Pressed if the high pressure of income tax could be eased, he stressed the need to act “in a responsible way”.

“I want to show people there’s a path to lower taxes. But we also want to be honest with people, this is not going to happen overnight,” he said. “It requires enormous discipline year in, year out.”


Mr Hunt said he will not take any actions that would “jeopardise” the fight against inflation, which is higher than wanted at 4.6%, though it has halved in the last year.

“The one thing we won’t do is any kind of tax cut that fuels inflation. We’ve done all this hard work, we’re not going to throw that away,” he told Sky, dampening hopes of cuts to income tax or national insurance.

The Sunday Times had reported Mr Hunt and Prime Minister Rishi Sunak are weighing up cuts to income tax or national insurance in a last-minute move to boost growth and their favour with voters.

Ms Reeves told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: “Cutting inheritance tax in the middle of a massive cost-of-living crisis and when public services are on their knees is not the right priority.

“I understand people’s desire to pass onto their children what they have worked hard for, but right now that is not the right thing to do and we would not support it.”

Welfare payments

The shadow chancellor also rejected Mr Hunt’s argument that he needs to take “difficult decisions” on welfare payments.

Typically, ministers use the September figure for inflation when uprating working-age benefits, which would mean a 6.7% hike.

However, the Chancellor has been considering using October’s far lower figure of 4.6%, which economists say would cut spending by around £3 billion.

The savings would largely affect working-age households receiving disability or means-tested benefits, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.

Ms Reeves said benefits should rise by the higher figure, adding: “If you pick and choose from year to year which inflation number is the cheapest thing to do, then what you see is the gradual erosion of people’s incomes.”

Inheritance tax

Slashing inheritance tax – potentially by half – would be popular with the Tory right as Mr Sunak comes under growing pressure from that wing of his party, but would only directly benefit a small proportion of the public.

Only about 4% of deaths in 2020/21 resulted in inheritance tax being paid, with exemptions allowing many couples to pass on up to £1 million tax-free.

Inheritance tax is charged at 40% on estates of more than £325,000, with an extra £175,000 towards a main residence passed to direct descendants.

The Conservatives are said to be considering cutting it in half before a potential promise to abolish it entirely in the next Tory manifesto, which could cost £7 billion a year in the short term.

However, the Institute for Fiscal Studies forecast that the amount that the tax raises could rise to more than £15 billion by 2033.

Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
5 months ago

Al Capone would have been fairer than this government. They make it an art to trickle wealth upwards, never downwards.

Post budget in the house the PM will be all over the interest rates he had nothing to do with, Rwanda and some stuff about “only Conservatives have something something” whilst the client press protect him.

Sarah Good
Sarah Good
5 months ago

What fuels inflation is NOT people getting a living wage or fair reward for their efforts. It is businesses unable to source products and materials because SOME clowns 1. Destroyed the most beneficial trading partnership this land has ever had 2. Wasted billions of our money on vaccines that didn’t work, buying prison boats to lock up refugees, trying to send refugees to third world countries, trying to eradicate trans people, flip flopping on building schools then not building schools, then closing schools which became dangerously derelict because they stopped building schools, then stopped, then restarted then stopped then cancelled… Read more »

Last edited 5 months ago by Sarah Good
5 months ago

The sheer dishonesty of this government’s stance is breathtaking. (K)Hunt is so bloody shifty and it shows in his facial expressions. Failing to acknowledge that this recent 2 year round of inflation was entirely driven by external factors then turbo boosted by the maniac Truss’ brief yet toxic intervention is dishonesty in extreme because he can’t be thick enough to actually believe that. Now of course there is a bit of a wage- price spiral but that was kind of inevitable given that well over 1/2 of the country’s workforce were being shunted into poverty by prices and interest rates.

5 months ago

Quote: “Aristocrats were killed in the French Revolution because of the anger felt by the masses of poor French citizens. The aristocrats were viewed as living extravagant lifestyles while people were impoverished, suffering, and starving in the country.” I’m not saying that killing wealthy people was a good idea but one can easily understand the common man’s anger when they were squeezed and squeezed for taxes to keep the rich in “extravagant lifestyles” for doing very little. Time for Hunt to look towards the rich in the UK.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.