Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

‘Major step back’ as gender quotas bill postponed

19 Jun 2024 4 minute read
Jane Hutt

Chris Haines, ICNN Senedd reporter

Plans to introduce gender quotas in future Senedd elections suffered a “major step backwards” due to “unnecessary” delays.

Jane Hutt confirmed reforms under the electoral candidate lists bill – which would require half of would-be Senedd members to be women – could be delayed by four years.

In a letter to Senedd members, Ms Hutt said the 2030 election may be a “more prudent” timetable for implementation than the initial 2026 plan.

Ms Hutt, who is chief whip and Trefnydd, the Welsh Government’s business manager, stressed that she remains committed to making the Senedd more representative.

But concerns have been raised that Wales does not have the powers to pass the bill, which could face legal challenge, with equal opportunities legislation reserved to Westminster.

‘Unacceptable’

Plaid Cymru’s Siân Gwenllian was extremely disappointed by the new timetable for the bill, with stage one of the legislative process pushed back from June 18 to July 16.

She questioned the Welsh Government’s reasoning for delaying the first crunch vote, saying the rationale “doesn’t hold water” and warning the latest delay is a huge step backwards.

The Arfon MS, who chairs the cross-party group on women, said: “The whole timetable for the bill is being pushed back. What will running the clock down mean?

“Well, there’s a risk that it’ll mean that we will have a larger Senedd, elected in a fairer way, but there’ll be a real risk that a lack of equality and a lack of diversity will continue as an unacceptable feature of the Welsh Parliament.

“We will have incomplete reform if the candidates bill, which is an integral part of the jigsaw, is not implemented.”

‘Weak’

Ms Gwenllian said a Labour UK Government could make an order in council, giving powers to the Senedd to pass the bill and putting the proposals beyond any doubt.

During the business statement on June 18, she accused Welsh ministers of rowing back on a programme for government commitment to introduce gender quotas.

She said: “It’s not two Labour Governments working hand in hand for Wales but rather a weak Welsh Labour Government in Wales just taking their instructions meekly from London.”

Ms Hutt said the bill got off to a disappointing start, with Elin Jones – the speaker or Llywydd – ruling that the proposed legislation would not be in the Senedd’s legal powers.

She told the chamber: “This is one of the crucial things about how we take forward a bill where there are issues about that grey area.”

‘Endangering’

Ms Hutt, who has been a minister for 25 years, said a voluntary scheme could be introduced if mandatory gender quotas cannot be implemented in time for the next election.

She raised the reform bill committee’s warning that candidate quotas could lead to legal challenge, potentially endangering the outcome of the May 2026 election.

The Conservatives’ Gareth Davies urged the minister to get “back to the real world”, echoing his party’s calls for the candidates bill to be dropped entirely.

Ms Hutt hit back at the Vale of Clwyd MS: “I’m utterly disgusted by what Gareth Davies said, by saying ‘back to the real world’. Why do we need a gender quotas bill?

“Because we need better representation of women, and I have to say, let’s look over there, where we certainly need this gender quotas bill.”

‘Desperate’

Darren Millar, the Conservatives’ shadow constitution secretary, took issue with the timing of the delay until after the UK general election on July 4.

“This bill shouldn’t just be postponed, it should be ditched altogether,” he said. “Candidates should be elected on merit, not because of their gender or any other protected characteristic.

“The shelving of the bill during an election campaign suggests this is a desperate attempt to avoid talking on the campaign trail about the fact the Labour Party can’t define a woman.”

In a letter to MSs when the bill was introduced in March, Elin Jones explained her position that the bill relates to a reserved matter and is not within the Senedd’s powers.

She said her view is based on legal tests and advice rather than the merits of the policy, stressing that the question can only be definitely answered by the Supreme Court.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Another Richard
Another Richard
26 days ago

Heaven knows why the Senedd is wasting its time and thereby our money on this absurdity. But it’s good to know there are lots of obstacle in its path.

The genuine Richsrd
The genuine Richsrd
25 days ago

100 per cent agree 🗳️✅

Education , Health, Roads , ♻️Environment , Employment and our culture wrapped in a box with RESPECT written on it ✅

Last edited 25 days ago by The genuine Richsrd
Adrian
Adrian
26 days ago

The only people who care about gender, sexuality, ethnicity etc are the ones not good enough to be put forward to represent their area and look to blame others.
I don’t want equality I want the best person in the role, and would love it to be more females.
To be fair, given the standard in the senedd we are already in a mess given the dearth of talent. If Vaughan is the answer then we are in big trouble.

Howie
Howie
26 days ago

It wasn’t as if they weren’t told by the EHRC in 2022 and again early 2024, that the protected characteristic was sex, i.e. Man or Woman, sex on birth certificate or as acquired through a gender recognition certificate and gender was not compatible with the Equality Act 2010.
The Scottish Govt fell foul of the Act under similar circumstances.

Mr Williams
Mr Williams
26 days ago

Sad about that, it would be great to see more women in politics, but I hope they will now shelve that ridiculous proposal to elect Senedd members by closed lists, with super-large constituencies.

Last edited 26 days ago by Mr Williams
Accidental Larger Sandpipers
Accidental Larger Sandpipers
26 days ago

Women currently make up 42% of Senedd members. Is it really so necessary to impose rigid quotas just to boost the proportion of women by 8%?

This is aside from supporters of the measure having the cheek to talk about “diversity”, when the reforms are designed to wipe out diversity by ensuring that only blindly loyal party drones can possibly get elected.

Adrian Bamford
Adrian Bamford
25 days ago

Last time I looked the Labour Party didn’t know what a woman is: difficult to see how they’ll make any progress on ‘gender’ equality.

NOT Grayham Jones
NOT Grayham Jones
25 days ago

Jane Hutt obviously is not in the same world as the rest of us. Most do not care what gender there MP is all they want is for them to do their job which im afraid to say is not very often these days.

Rob
Rob
25 days ago

Gender Quotas are unessessary period!! Plaid you are no longer in partnership with Labour. Drop this rubbish focus on more important matters.

Welsh Patriot
Welsh Patriot
25 days ago

“gender quotas in future Senedd elections” plus the change in the voting system where the parties decide the electoral lists.

This maybe is why people have lost trust in the Senedd

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.