Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Marine Le Pen barred from seeking public office for embezzlement

31 Mar 2025 4 minute read
“Marine Le Pen VIVA 24 (2)” by Vox España is marked with CC0 1.0.

National Rally leader Marine Le Pen strode out of a French court as the chief judge barred her from seeking public office after she was found guilty of embezzling EU funds.

The judge hasn’t yet said how long Le Pen will be ineligible for running for public office — a decision that could derail the far-right leader’s career and infuriate her millions of supporters.

Ms Le Pen did not wait around to find out after the verdict on Monday.

Drama

In a moment of high drama, the politician picked up her bag, slung it over her arm and strode briskly out of the courtroom, her heels click-click-clicking on the hardwood floor, leaving disbelief in her wake.

The chief judge looked up at Ms Le Pen but carried on reading out the sentence.

Ms Le Pen left the high-rise Paris courthouse without stopping to speak to reporters and climbed into a car that drove her away.

Earlier on Monday, from the front row of the court, Ms Le Pen showed no immediate reaction when the judge declared her guilty, but she grew more agitated as the proceedings continued.

She later repeatedly nodded her head in disagreement as the judge went into greater detail, saying Ms Le Pen’s party had illegally used European Parliament money for its own benefit.

“Incredible,” she whispered at one point.

The judge also handed down guilty verdicts to eight other current or former members of her party who, like her, previously served as European Parliament legislators.

Ms Le Pen and her co-defendants face up to 10 years in prison.

They can appeal, which would lead to another trial.

The verdict was shaping up as a resounding defeat for Ms Le Pen and her party.

“Democratic bypass”

As well as finding her and eight other former European legislators guilty of embezzling public funds, the court also handed down guilty verdicts to 12 other people who served as parliamentary aides for Ms Le Pen and what is now the National Rally party, formerly the National Front.

The chief judge, who read the ruling delivered by her and two other justices, said Ms Le Pen had been at the heart of “a system” that her party used to siphon off EU parliament money.

The judge said Ms Le Pen and other co-defendants did not enrich themselves personally.

But the ruling described the embezzlement as “a democratic bypass” that deceived the parliament and voters.

Ms Le Pen and 24 other officials from the National Rally were accused of having used money intended for European Union parliamentary aides to pay staff who worked for the party between 2004 and 2016, in violation of the 27-nation bloc’s regulations.

Ms Le Pen and her co-defendants denied wrongdoing.

Ms Le Pen, 56, was runner-up to President Emmanuel Macron in the 2017 and 2022 presidential elections, and her party’s electoral support has grown in recent years.

During the nine-week trial that took place in late 2024, she argued that ineligibility “would have the effect of depriving me of being a presidential candidate” and disenfranchise her supporters.

“There are 11 million people who voted for the movement I represent. So tomorrow, potentially, millions and millions of French people would see themselves deprived of their candidate in the election,” she told the panel of three judges.

If Ms Le Pen cannot run in 2027, her seeming natural successor would be Jordan Bardella, Ms Le Pen’s 29-year-old protege who succeeded her at the helm of the party in 2021.

Ms Le Pen denied accusations she was at the head of the system meant to siphon off EU parliament money to benefit her party, which she led from 2011 to 2021.

She argued instead that it was acceptable to adapt the work of the aides paid by the European Parliament to the needs of the legislators, including some political work related to the party.

Hearings showed that some EU money was used to pay for Ms Le Pen’s bodyguard — who was once her father’s bodyguard — as well as her personal assistant.

Prosecutors requested a two-year prison sentence and a five-year period of ineligibility for Ms Le Pen.

Ms Le Pen said she felt they were “only interested” in preventing her from running for president.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest


7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeff
Jeff
25 days ago

Which governments are protesting this?

Oh yes, guess who. Farages chums across the far right spectrum, russia, hungary….

Mark
Mark
25 days ago

Nikolas Sarkozy was convicted of bribing a judge, and also convicted for electoral financial impropriety. François Fillon was imprisoned for creating a false job for his wife. Alain Juppe was convicted for another fake jobs scandal. Jacques Chirac was convicted for using public money to pay for party personnel (very similar to Le Pen’s charge). Edith Cresson was convicted for nepotism. Given how many former French presidents and prime ministers have criminal records, it is hard to understand why Le Pen’s should bar her from office. Meanwhile, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, another front-runner in the upcoming campaign, has a conviction for intimidating… Read more »

Bilbo
Bilbo
24 days ago
Reply to  Mark

How many of those convictions came before they stood for election?

Rob
Rob
25 days ago

At least the French have common sense, unlike the United States. Trump should have been disqualified from holding Public Office again after the events of January 6, 2021.

TheWoodForTheTrees
TheWoodForTheTrees
25 days ago

I guess the moral of the story is to wait until you’re actually in power before you start acting as if the law doesn’t apply to you.

Somewhat presumtuous of her.

Shame.

Mark
Mark
23 days ago

You are right. Keir Starmer had the foresight to ask for the law to be rewritten for his personal benefit long before he ran for power. Look up ‘Keir Starmer pension law’ if you would like to destroy any last shred of belief that we are all equal before the law.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/2588/contents/made

Bryce
Bryce
24 days ago

Or it gets overturned on appeal and the new victim narrative propels her into the top job.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.

Complete your gift to make an impact