Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Minister comes under fire for shooting remarks

27 Apr 2023 2 minute read
Red legged partridge. Inset – Julie James MS / Image: Welsh Government

A Welsh Minister has come under fire after making remarks in the Senedd about shooting and hunting.

Minister for Climate Change, Julie James MS made the comments during a debate in the Senedd about shooting in the Welsh countryside.

When questioned on the role of shooting and conservation, the Minister said: “I do not think killing anything as a sport or leisure is anything that any civilised society should support I’m afraid and I’ve been clear about that.

“These things need to change in line with he way we work. We absolutely need to protect our way of life and we need to protect out communities but we also need to change our behaviour.”

The British Association for Shooting and Conservation (BASC) said the comments would create “widespread discontent” across Wales’ rural communities.

The debate was led by Brecon and Radnorshire MS, James Evans during a 12-week consultation by Natural Resources Wales on proposals to introduce a licensing system for the release of pheasants and red-legged partridge in Wales.

If the proposals are implemented, game bird releasing will be restricted and only allowed under licence.

Licensing

BASC is opposed to the proposed licensing and says there is “sufficient regulation” already in place.

Speaking in support of shooting in Wales at the debate, James Evans MS said: “Shooting is fundamental to rural communities in Wales.

“It provides opportunities for people from all walks of life to come together in the great outdoors and enjoy each other’s company.”

Speaking after the debate, BASC’s head of policy and campaigns, Dr Conor O’Gorman, said: “The Minister’s comments on the floor of the Senedd highlight the anti-shooting agenda currently driving policy decisions in Wales.

“It is not just a blatant disregard of scientific evidence but real-world contempt for the rural community and thousands of jobs.

“Shooting is worth £75 million to Wales’ economy annually, supporting the equivalent of 2,400 full-time jobs. The outright dismissal of shooting is damaging to the Welsh countryside and will create widespread discontent across rural Wales.

“Our thanks must go to the Members of the Senedd willing to stand up and support sustainable shooting, using facts and figures to back up their comments.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
AdamYork
AdamYork
1 year ago

BASC shooting stuff is conservation……Pheasant releases are an eco-disaster on a grand scale.

GW Atkinson
GW Atkinson
1 year ago
Reply to  AdamYork

Why? Do the pheasants cut down trees and build concrete building all over the place?

Cymro
Cymro
1 year ago
Reply to  GW Atkinson

They damage vegetation and trees, they pollute through droppings and rotting carcasses and often cause endangered birds to be shot when a flurry of trigger happy people decide anything with wings is ‘fair game’.

Glen
Glen
1 year ago
Reply to  Cymro

Absolute nonsense.

Crwtyddol
Crwtyddol
1 year ago
Reply to  Cymro

Your comments show how totally ignorant you are of how shoots are run. Everything you say is completely wrong, nonsensical and I must add that I am NOT a shooter.In addition, the food put down aids native birds.

Kerry Davies
Kerry Davies
1 year ago
Reply to  GW Atkinson

There are sound ecological reasons for a drastic reduction in the mass release of game bred purely to be shot. But the biggest single reason is what Atkinson calls “posh pricks” replacing generations of farming families and destroying rural communities.
It wouldn’t be so bad if they weren’t such appalling drivers and such irresponsible parkers. Bring back organic lambs.

George Thomas
George Thomas
1 year ago
Reply to  AdamYork

If it’s done for sport or leisure, then it’s not conservation.
If it’s conservation and necessary, then there is no fear of it stopping based on comments made.

Killing for fun can be left in the past regardless of what it means for jobs. Find better jobs.

GW Atkinson
GW Atkinson
1 year ago

Imagine having the name conservation and shooting in the same name. That’s like calling yourself a pro life murderer. Imagine killing wild animals and then pretending its conservation while farmers use up huge amounts of land for sheep and cattle when it could be forest. This is just posh pr1cks with a killing fetish.

Last edited 1 year ago by GW Atkinson
Crwtyddol
Crwtyddol
1 year ago
Reply to  GW Atkinson

Conservation is defined as creative interplay between hums s and their environment. It is not preservation, which can be ineffective. Shooting involves habitat improvement, and by making things easier for game birds, by ensuring a
plentiful food supply, this benefits native birds, without exception.

Pip
Pip
1 year ago

“It provides opportunities for people from all walks of life to come together in the great outdoors and enjoy each other’s company.”

Could they not just go for a nice walk, without needing to kill things?

C.Jones
C.Jones
1 year ago

I live in a rural community and can say with assurance that almost no-one here thinks shooting things is a good idea. The BASC does NOT speak for rural communities.

Cat
Cat
1 year ago

Its about time the shooting and hunting fraternity were called out. More sheep lost round here to the hunt than to any wild animal. And the roads are littered with dead pheasants around the shoots – and that’s the ones hit by cars. This is not sport and people who get their kicks from killing animals should be reported not supported.

Che Guevara's Fist
Che Guevara's Fist
1 year ago
Reply to  Cat

People who get their kicks from killing ought to have a bat across their heads.

G Horton-Jones
G Horton-Jones
1 year ago

Gun law in Wales should be totally under our control here in Wales..

John Hammond
John Hammond
1 year ago

“…the Minister said: “I do not think killing anything as a sport or leisure is anything that any civilised society should support…”
I agree with the Minister.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
1 year ago

Meanwhile the minister’s deputy performs a u-turn on the Llanbedr by-pass, I do believe the ambition of Lee Waters runs deep…

hdavies15
hdavies15
1 year ago
Reply to  Mab Meirion

Has he already managed a U turn on a bit of road before it gets built ? That’s a man with some serious abilities. Pity he doesn’t channel them a bit better.

Anorthosis Famagusta
Anorthosis Famagusta
1 year ago

I’m inclined to agree with Julie James here. We’re not talking here about an individual shooting the odd bird for his pot – this is large scale game bird farming, thousands of non-native species bred for very wealthy people to enjoy an afternoon’s shooting. It’s an ecological disaster and of course it should be licensed and controlled if not banned altogether. As a society we’re a lot more tolerant of the barbarism of the upper classes … But I also think welsh labour need to get their act together and do some joined up thinking about rural communities- and be… Read more »

Susan Todd
Susan Todd
1 year ago

Well said Julie, so many get squashed on the roads, let alone being shot. Then if they survive, which some of them do, they run the risk of being shot again the next season. They have to vie with other birds for diminishing food during the rest of the year. It’s barbaric, when is a bird not a bird? When is a life not a life? Born to be shot. What’s wrong with clay pigeon shooting if these shooters want to meet up to enjoy themselves?

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.