Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Minister pulled plug on top job selection process and appointed candidate he favoured

01 Jul 2023 6 minute read
Education Minister Jeremy Miles speaking in the Senedd

Martin Shipton

Serious criticisms have been made by a cross-party committee of Senedd Members after Education Minister Jeremy Miles decided to pull the plug on an agreed selection process and appoint a candidate he favoured to be chief executive of a powerful new body.

The Commission for Tertiary Education and Research (CTER) will have an annual budget of £800m and take responsibility for the strategy, funding and oversight of further education,, higher education, adult education and apprenticeships and training. It will be established in September and become operational in April 2024.

In April this year Mr Miles issued a written statement in which he announced that Simon Pirotte, the principal and chief executive of Bridgend College, was his preferred candidate for the new post at the Commission, even though he hadn’t initially submitted an application.

The Minister stated: “A rigorous, open recruitment process took place for the role of chief executive between November 2022 and February 2023. However, the panel was unable to recommend a candidate for appointment. Having carefully considered all options available to me, I have therefore decided to appoint directly into the role.”

Camper van

In May a pre-appointment hearing took place at which Mr Pirotte was questioned by members of the Senedd’s Children, Young People and Education Committee. During the hearing Mr Pirotte expressed incredulity that he was the Minister’s preferred candidate for chief executive, saying: “Nobody’s more surprised to be sitting here than me”. Asked why he hadn’t applied for the role when it was open, he told the committee: “To be honest, my thoughts were around planning retirement and buying a camper van.”

The committee has now published a report in which it states: “We are incredibly disappointed with the process that has been followed for this appointment. This is an incredibly important post, which will be responsible for ensuring the bold ambitions for the Commission will be delivered upon.

“The establishment of a new organisation is a critical time and decisions made now will shape how successful the Commission will be. While we understand the challenging timeframe in terms of establishing the Commission and the need to get key posts recruited, the importance and significance of this role means we believe an open recruitment process should have been re-run.”

Plaid Cymru MS Sioned Williams, a member of the committee which questioned Mr Pirotte, said: “When it comes to the appointment of a chief executive for a brand new body that will wield considerable power over education in Wales, the process must be beyond reproach. Ministerial appointments, like public appointments, should follow robust, fair and transparent processes as a matter of course.

“Chief executive of the brand new CTER is no small role – indeed the CTER will be second only to the Welsh NHS in terms of the scale of its budget. Yet the Welsh Labour Government has appointed a chief executive who was not part of the initial open application process.

“Having failed to appoint at the end of that rigorous process, a chief executive has been appointed who did not have to undertake the psychological assessments nor psychometric tests expected of others, and had no requirement to prepare a presentation, nor take part in engagement events with key stakeholders.

“This is no slight on the ability or suitability of the new chief executive, but a criticism of the way in which Ministers can appoint anyone they like to such a key role, side-stepping robust processes. The appointment method in this instance raises serious questions about the independence of this new body.”

Concerns

Responding to the committee report in a letter to its chair Jayne Bryant, Mr Miles said: “I appreciate the Committee have long-standing concerns about the pre-appointment hearing process for public appointments, but as the report acknowledges this was not a public appointment. The first person appointed as chief executive to the Commission is a Ministerial appointment as set out in Schedule 1 to the Tertiary Education & Research (Wales) Act 2022. However, in recognition of the significant role that the Committee plays in education and the importance of this appointment, I committed to an introductory hearing during the passage of the Act.

“This is an important distinction, not least because the appointment process for the chief executive is not regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments. I was obviously disappointed when informed that the recruitment panel were unable to recommend a suitable candidate for appointment following an extensive, open and robust recruitment process.

“I therefore considered professional advice from officials and our appointed executive search company on the merits of repeating the exercise. “This advice was clear on the operational risks to establishing the Commission associated with rerunning the exercise and the likelihood of it generating a different outcome so soon after concluding the initial process. In this context, the Committee will wish to note executive search had already contacted 190 potential candidates from across the tertiary education sector in Wales, the UK and beyond.

“The Commission would simply not have been established in September had I not taken the decision to move to a direct appointment, moreover there is absolutely no guarantee the Commission would have been operational by April 2024 had the recruitment exercise been re-run. I considered this an unacceptable outcome for learners in Wales.

“I note the Committee’s report into the chief executive highlights ‘concerns of stakeholders during our scrutiny of the Bill about protecting the independence of the Commission. It is important that the recruitment process for this critical post does not call that into question in any way.’

“I absolutely agree it is important we protect the independence of the Commission but would highlight Simon’s appointment has been widely welcomed across the various post 16 sectors. This is no small feat and, of course, there is no guarantee that re-running an open recruitment exercise would have led to this outcome.”

We have been told that, prior to the appointment, Mr Miles had met Mr Pirotte on just a handful of occasions for purely professional reasons.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
16 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dr John Ball
Dr John Ball
1 year ago

Nothing changes. Jobs for the boys.
All very well Sioned Williams having a moan but you’re in partnership with Labour and by extension, part of this carve up.

G Horton-Jones.
G Horton-Jones.
1 year ago

Amddiffyn Cymru
This is clearly not in the interests of Wales however you pitch it.
Jeremy Miles should put in a resignation letter today and the applicant should have the moral fibre to decline the appointment

Huwevo
Huwevo
1 year ago

I love ‘my thoughts were around planning retirement and buying a camper van’ – as an aside, I wonder if any perspective seller of a van had a Scottish accent! My immediate reaction is that Mr Pirotte is well placed to take on the role given his previous/current role. He was identified as suitable (and, presumably, not on a whim) after the failure of the initial recruitment process, and where rerunning the process was (so we are told) judged not practicable to get a person in place in time for the new body to function. He also sounds like he… Read more »

hdavies15
hdavies15
1 year ago

Maybe they got the right man for the job but Miles should have been a lot more sensitive to the scope for all sorts of accusations of dirty dealing. Big blot on his book as it perpetuates the notion that Labour always find a way of recruiting their favoured few.

wayne
wayne
1 year ago

Yet again, at the hart of our elected government in Cardiff, Chumocracy rules, Democracy takes a knife to the back slowly dying stab by stab. And the perpetrators wan’t another 36 members to sit by a dodgy election process. Digon uw digon, enough is enough! Time for change.

Last edited 1 year ago by wayne
John Griffin
John Griffin
1 year ago

Back in the 1990s stuff like this was decided in the bar at St Helens ground or in the Angel Hotel, same time contracts were being sorted. Actually having a process is an improvement.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
1 year ago

J. Miles was part of the Farmgate off the record deals…

Mawkernewek
Mawkernewek
1 year ago

£800 million sounds quite a lot of money for a Commission. Should they really be spending that much on administration rather than actual education?

hdavies15
hdavies15
1 year ago
Reply to  Mawkernewek

Correct, but it’s “administration” and “management” that provide the well paid roles for the select pals of the regime who are not equipped to do real work. After all educating and training of our people is low down in the pecking order as far as these selfish s.o.d.s are concerned.

Cathy Jones
Cathy Jones
1 year ago

Call it what it is: CORRUPTION.

He must be removed from the Senedd and prevented from EVER holding office again in any capacity whatsoever…. We cannot tolerate the same kind of rank hypocrisy, corruption, sleaze and boys club rules that abound in Westminster.

hdavies15
hdavies15
1 year ago
Reply to  Cathy Jones

It already abounds in Wales. It’s just that we are smaller scale and normally the price tags are smaller, but the damage done is just as proportionate.

Another Richard
Another Richard
1 year ago

I entirely agree with the thrust of this article. This appointment appears to lack both fairness and transparency. It’s a pity, though, that the Education Committee seems unable to produce a report in clear, measured prose. The repeated use of “incredibly” strikes a hysterical note at the outset, and the other extracts read as if they were generated by AI rather than written by a literate human being.

Dave williams
Dave williams
1 year ago

This is why devolution isn’t working.

Erisian
Erisian
1 year ago

Nothing like due process… No resemblance in fact!
How are we supoposed to look down our noses at Tory corruption and sleeze when our own start acting in the same way?
Shame on them

hdavies15
hdavies15
1 year ago
Reply to  Erisian

That’s how it’s always been with the Labour Party machine… always looks after its own self interests.

Windy
Windy
1 year ago

I wonder what job I will now be offered that I haven’t thought of applying for, I hope it will be something I have an interest in as I may become bored if it’s something i never thought about.
Do I have to notify the government I’m not interested in doing anything before they appoint me, or will they just assume I don’t want to do anything and just appoint me anyway

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.