MSs approve Senedd reform bill
Chris Haines, ICNN Senedd reporter
Landmark legislation to increase the size of the Senedd and change its voting system cleared the final hurdle in the Welsh Parliament.
MSs voted 43-16 in favour of the members and elections bill, securing a necessary two-thirds supermajority, following a debate on May 8.
Under the bill, the number of Senedd members will increase from 60 to 96 in response to concerns that the relatively small size of the legislature leads to ineffective scrutiny.
Ministers
The maximum number of Welsh Government ministers will increase to 17 – not including the first minister and counsel general – with powers to further increase this to 19.
The 32 constituencies in Wales that will be used in the forthcoming general election will be paired to create 16 for the 2026 Senedd poll, with each returning six members.
‘Bold reforms’
Mick Antoniw, who is counsel general, the Welsh Government’s chief legal adviser, said Welsh democracy has grown, developed and matured over the past 25 years.
Mr Antoniw told the chamber, or Siambr, that while the responsibilities of the Senedd have grown, its capacity has not – remaining the smallest of the UK’s devolved legislatures.
“The bill before us changes that,” he said. “It is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to invest in our democracy by creating a modern Senedd.”
Mr Antoniw said the bold reforms will give the Senedd greater ability and capacity to hold the Welsh Government to account as well as ensure that every vote counts.
He argued laws are best forged in the fires of parliamentary scrutiny, saying: “I think we’ve seen that in this bill’s own legislative passage.”
‘Deeply flawed’
Darren Millar, who is the Conservatives’ shadow constitution minister, described the bill as a deeply flawed piece of legislation which will undermine Welsh democracy.
Wales will move away from the current additional-member electoral system which uses a mix of first-past-the-post constituencies and regional party lists.
Future Senedd elections will instead use a full form of proportional representation, with Wales becoming the first UK nation to entirely scrap the first-past-the-post system.
Under the new closed-list system, People will vote for political parties rather than individuals and parties will control the order of candidates on lists.
Mr Millar, whose party was alone in voting against the bill, said the reforms will damage the relationship between the public and their elected representatives.
‘Shameful’
He told the Siambr the closed-list system will strip away a fundamental right enjoyed by generations of Welsh voters to choose an individual candidate.
The Tory MS for Clwyd West said: “It is the biggest power grab from the people of Wales that it has ever suffered in the history of Welsh democracy.”
Mr Millar criticised the “shameful” costs of expansion which have been estimated at almost £18m a year, suggesting it would be better spent on schools and hospitals.
He said: “That money instead will be spent on luxury offices and pay for 36 more politicians, their entourage of staff and the structure needed here at the Senedd to support them.
“Spending £120m on more politicians over the review period is a luxury we can ill afford.”
‘Long awaited’
Heledd Fychan, for Plaid Cymru, said the long-awaited reforms will strengthen opposition members’ ability to hold Welsh ministers accountable.
Ms Fychan, who represents South Wales Central, stressed that the reforms are not the end of the journey, with a review to follow the 2026 election.
She said Plaid Cymru will continue to support – and campaign for – the single-transferable vote (STV) electoral system, which would allow voters to rank candidates.
Ms Fychan added that her party will hold the Welsh Government to a commitment to bring forward a recall system, which would allow voters to remove members between elections.
She said: “There is still work to be done to strengthen our democracy but the step that we are taking today is a huge step forward – not only for this Senedd but also for our nation.”
‘Robbing voters’
Jane Dodds agreed the bill will enhance scrutiny as well as ensure proper representation for each and every one of Wales’ diverse communities.
The Lib Dems’ leader in Wales welcomed the “outdated” first-past-the-post system being binned but warned the proposed replacement is fundamentally flawed.
Ms Dodds said: “The introduction of closed party lists risks robbing voters of true choice.”
The Mid and West Wales MS argued STV would be the fairest and most accountable system, with every vote carrying equal weight and power.
Ms Dodds said she would support the legislation but she urged fellow members to view it as only the first step on a journey towards a stronger, fully democratic parliament for Wales.
‘Practical problems’
Mike Hedges, a Labour backbencher who represents Swansea East, pointed out the practical problems of having as few as four members on some Senedd committees.
He said that day’s public accounts committee meeting would have had insufficient members to proceed if he had to go to the toilet, warning: “You cannot run an organisation like that.”
Mr Hedges described the reforms as akin to reverse gerrymandering, suggesting Labour will find it hard to win and the new system will consistently produce a hung Senedd.
The bill is expected to receive Royal Assent, officially becoming an Act, later this year.
MSs are considering two related bills: the elections bill, which would introduce automatic vote registration, and the candidate lists bill on gender quotas in Senedd elections.
Commenting on the passing of the Bill, Elin Jones MS, Llywydd of the Senedd, said: “As we mark 25 years of devolution this week, today’s vote represents the start of the next chapter in the story of Wales’s democracy.
“The Senedd today is a very different place compared with the National Assembly of 1999. We now have a fully-fledged parliament with law-making and tax-varying powers, but our capacity to represent the people of Wales and to hold the government to account hasn’t grown at the same pace.
“The changes supported today by a clear majority of Members will ensure a stronger, more effective Senedd for the 21st century.”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
‘Ms Fychan, who represents South Wales Central, stressed that the reforms are not the end of the journey, with a review to follow the 2026 election’. A review!! Like Neville Chamberlain waving his white paper. Does she honestly think that a review will change anything fundamentally? ‘She said Plaid Cymru will continue to support – and campaign for – the single-transferable vote (STV) electoral system, which would allow voters to rank candidates.’ Infuriating. What is the point? The closed list system is here. This is just movement from Plaid, looking busy in the office and treating their voters like idiots.… Read more »
No surprises in the Senedd Reform debate this afternoon. Relieved to see the bill passed as expected, with 43 to 16 supermajority vote. Debate to propose further changes to Senedd voting method deferred to another time. All good.
I’m all for ditching the first past the post system but this just feels like a stitch up that benefits Labour. You cannot vote out crooked ministers like Vaughan Gethin without voting out every single Labour candidate.
Just have to recognise Labour have half the MSs. Nothing will pass with out their agreement.
I’m with Heledd on this one. FPTP is deadful but closed lists will return more political horrors such as Andrew RT Davies. I am very disappointed that we were not able to get this expansion through without this bad electoral method. The fight for STV continues. I’ll be pushing to see that in the next Plaid manifesto.
Hard Luck Cymru…we’re stuffed in broad daylight…
Closed lists! We will be sorry for letting them get away with making themselves untouchable…
Good bye and good riddance to first past the post for Senedd!
Want the same for uk parliament!
I’m one Plaid Cymru voter who deplores the party’s ‘compromise’ with Labour on the voting system. The lack of ability to vote for individual candidates will almost surely mean a decline in the already pathetic voter turnout.
It wasn’t really a ‘compromise’ was it but a pragmatic take it or leave it.
Leaving it would see no change.
Stand up sit down do as you are told. Or else. This is how putin runs Russia
Unfortunately we have these rather inconvenient things called “laws”, which dictate how we may or may not live our lives. If, for example, one wished to run over small children who are stupid enough to run into the road, that would unfortunately be branded as “against the law” by the dictators in power – to compound matters, agents of the state would be sent to forcibly restrain and detain me.
We’ve had these so-called “laws” dictated to us for countless centuries, it truly is a sad state of affairs.
Running over small children is against the law in any country with a road, and happy to hear you are all for the retention of all the laws passed by Westminster on our behalf over the countless centuries will they include first past the post during elections for a new STV system which sounds like utopia for all.
U turn Tories will of course now campaign for all the new seats and of course not mention their mind change when seeking voters support …
If they’re so outraged by it, why hasn’t their brave leader ever stood in a constituency seat? They’re like a broken clock on this one. They’re right about the closed lists but probably by accident! Their long and committed hostility towards Welsh Democracy reveals their broken political inner workings. Beyond repair I fear!
Closed lists and 16 jumbo constituency groupings – some odd way of enhancing democratic choice ! Open lists electing 3 from 32 constituencies using STV would enhance it further so why stop half way ? Ah yes, it works well for Labour.