Support our Nation today - please donate here

‘No ministerial intervention’ in decision to refer Johnson to police, Chalk says

24 May 2023 4 minute read
Former prime minister Boris Johnson. Photo Jonathan Brady PA Images

Ministers were not involved in a decision to refer Boris Johnson to the police over further potential coronavirus rule breaches, Justice Secretary Alex Chalk said.

Mr Johnson believes he is the victim of a “politically motivated stitch up” after the Cabinet Office passed to the police concerns over events in Chequers and Downing Street following a review of his official diary carried out ahead of the Covid public inquiry.

Mr Johnson’s office claims the handling of the situation has been “bizarre and unacceptable” and the events in question were within the rules.

“It appears some within government have decided to make unfounded suggestions both to the police and to the Privileges Committee,” a statement said.

“Many will conclude that this has all the hallmarks of yet another politically motivated stitch up.”

But the proper process has been followed and there was “no ministerial intervention”, Mr Chalk said.

The diary revealed visits by friends to Chequers during the pandemic and new allegations about Mr Johnson’s behaviour in Downing Street, The Times, which broke the story, said.

The Cabinet Office passed concerns to the Metropolitan Police and Thames Valley Police after the new information came to light during a review by taxpayer-funded lawyers.


The Privileges Committee, which is conducting an inquiry into whether Mr Johnson lied to Parliament about the partygate scandal, has also been informed.

Mr Chalk told LBC: “There is a Covid inquiry taking place. In the course of that, documentation has to be scrubbed or reviewed by lawyers to ensure it can be disclosed in the normal way.

“Material came to light which was passed to the civil service.

“The civil service considered that in accordance with their code, and with no ministerial intervention, I want to make that absolutely clear, that was then passed to the police.

“From the civil service’s point of view, if they sat on it and suppressed it, people would have criticised them. If they passed it on, that will raise questions as well.

“Ultimately, whether it was the right judgment to do it turns on what’s in those documents.”

Mr Johnson’s office said the ex-premier’s lawyers have written to police to “explain in detail why the Cabinet Office is entirely wrong in its assertions”.

It read: “No contact was made with Mr Johnson before these incorrect allegations were made both to the police and to the Privileges Committee. This is both bizarre and unacceptable.

“For whatever political purpose, it is plain that a last-ditch attempt is being made to lengthen the Privileges Committee investigation as it was coming to a conclusion and to undermine Mr Johnson.”

The Cabinet Office said: “Information came to light during the process of preparing evidence for submission to the Covid inquiry.

“It was identified as part of the normal disclosure review of potentially relevant documents being undertaken by the legal team for inquiry witnesses.

“In line with obligations in the Civil Service Code, this material has been passed to the relevant authorities and it is now a matter for them.”

Senior Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg, a Johnson loyalist, told GB News he visited Chequers with his family during the pandemic but the meeting was “entirely within the rules”.

He said: “I can tell you that during that period I went to Chequers. I was invited there with my children, entirely in accordance with the rules. Another senior government minister was going to come but the prime minister cancelled him because you were only allowed to have one family present at the time.”

The Daily Mail quoted a friend of the former prime minister as saying he was “seriously considering” legal action against the Government over the referrals.


The fallout adds to the problems facing Rishi Sunak, who was fined over a gathering in Downing Street during the pandemic along with Mr Johnson in June 2020.

Mr Sunak faces Prime Minister’s Questions later on Wednesday in which the subject of Mr Johnson’s past conduct could be raised.

Deputy Labour leader Angela Rayner said the revelations show the Tories are too “haunted by their own failure” to govern.

The Liberal Democrats have demanded Mr Sunak’s Government brings an end to the taxpayer-funded legal defence provided to Mr Johnson over the partygate probe.

The Government expects to pay an estimated £222,000 in legal fees to help Mr Johnson defend himself in the Privileges Committee inquiry.

Lindsay Jackson, spokeswoman for the Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice group, branded Mr Johnson “totally unfit for any form of public service” following the revelations and suggested he “quietly step back from public life”.

Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.