Plaid Cymru urge independence supporters to respond to new Welsh constitutional commission
Plaid Cymru have urged supporters of Welsh independence to make their views heard to a new constitutional commission.
Chaired alongside Professor Laura McAllister, the Independent Commission for the Constitutional Future of Wales said that it would be the first of its kind to involve citizens in a national conversation on how their country is run.
The commission is now calling for the people of Wales to join a “national conversation” so that Wales is on the “front foot”. Anyone that wishes to do so can contribute on the website.
Plaid Cymru’s spokesperson for the constitution, Rhys ab Owen MS, urged people to take part.
“This Constitutional Commission is an opportunity to hold the most wide-ranging national conversation about Wales’ future,” he said. “That decision should be decided by the people of Wales.
“I am pleased that the Commission are keen to engage with as many people as possible and are inviting people to take part in this crucial national conversation.
“Whether you are an individual or part of a group, and especially if you support independence, I urge you to contribute to this important process.
“Plaid Cymru looks forward to engaging constructively with the Commission and its work. We will make use of every opportunity to put forward the case for independence. We know that our nation’s interests will be best served when decisions over Wales’ future are placed in the hands of the people of Wales.”
The co-chairs of the commission, Professor Laura McAllister and Dr. Rowan Williams, have set out seven broad questions that they want the public to consider, including one that quizzes the public about the merits of Welsh independence.
The seven questions the commission would like members of the public to answer are:
1. What matters to you about the way Wales is run?
2. What do you think the priorities for the commission should be?
3. Thinking about how Wales is governed, by the Welsh Government and the UK government, what are the strengths of the current system, what aspects do you most value and wish to protect? Can you provide examples?
4. Are there any problems with the current system, and if so, how could they be addressed? Again, please provide examples.
5. Thinking about the UK government, the Welsh Government and Welsh local government (your local council), what do you think about the balance of power and responsibility between these three types of government – is it about right or should it change and if so, how? – eg. who should have more power, or less?
6. As a distinct country and political unit, how should Wales be governed in the future? Should we:
- broadly keep the current arrangements where Wales is governed as part of the UK, and the Westminster Parliament delegates some responsibilities to the Senedd and Welsh Government, with those responsibilities adjusted as in Q5, OR
- move towards Wales having more autonomy to decide for itself within a more federal UK, with most matters decided by the Senedd and Welsh Government, and the Westminster Parliament decides UK-wide matters on behalf of Wales (and other parts of the UK) OR
- move towards Wales having full control to govern itself and be independent from the UK OR
- pursue any other governance model you would like to suggest
- alongside any of these options, should more responsibilities be given to local councils bringing decision making closer to people across Wales and if so, please provide examples.
7. Overall, what is most important to you in about the way in which Wales should be governed in the future?
Co-chair Professor Laura McAllister said: “We’re extremely keen to hear from organisations and groups as much as individual members of the Welsh public. We want to learn from the organisations closest to different communities about what is important to them in this conversation.
“The Commission gives us an opportunity to take charge by having a national conversation about where we want Wales to be in the future, and what kind of Wales we want for our children and grandchildren.”
The other co-chair, Dr Rowan Williams, said: “The Commission’s job is to think about how Wales is governed, and consider options for change. This is an open invitation for people in all parts of Welsh society to share what is important to them and how we can improve the lives of people living in Wales.
“We’re living through a time of immense political change and there’s growing recognition across the UK that the Union needs to reform, with movements for more radical change – including independence – gaining traction.”
The Commission’s dialogue with the public and organisations will be ongoing right up until summer 2023, and views gathered during engagement will inform its recommendations. Early engagement is welcomed as responses received by the end of July will also inform the Commission’s interim report in winter 2022.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
It’s time for a new Wales vote Plaid Cymru 🏴
If 100% of us voted yes to Indy the tories would just say “no” in Putinesque manner. A Labour UK government would do the same but more politely. Welsh patriots have only one option frankly. We all know full well what that option is.
I am concerned that there is no means to ensure participants are Welsh and not trolls
1. There isn’t
2. Ethnostate is it now?
No, he clearly means that there is no guarantee that any troll who doesn’t live in Wales can register an opinion.
However, it’s not an online vote, unlike the recent one in Machynlleth that was compromised by votes from non-residents., so let them troll as much as they like. The Commission aren’t stupid and should be able to identify these.
I don’t need to be reminded by Plaid Cymru thank you – a party that has reneged on independence and only makes the right noises because of the rise of Yes Cymru.
Before those of you about to respond, carefully read the so-called Independence document published last year – find a serious, unqualified commitment in amongst the many grand words – oh, and the series of “consultative” referenda carefully worded to kill the idea.
The link to their website in the article doesnt work for me.