Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Plans for new restoration scheme for Ffos y Fran revealed

21 Feb 2025 5 minute read
Ffos-y-Fran opencast coal mine

Anthony Lewis, local democracy reporter

Plans for a new restoration scheme for the Ffos y Fran opencast coal mine in have been revealed,

Merthyr (South Wales) Ltd has applied for a revised scheme for the final restoration of 285 hectares of land that has previously been part of the surface mine operations at Ffos-y-Fran.

This scheme represents a change to an existing restoration scheme from a planning permission given in 2011.

Ffos y Fran closed in November, 2023, after Merthyr Tydfil Council refused an application to extend the time of operations there.

Operations had continued at the mine without planning permission after September, 2022, when it was originally meant to close and this led to an enforcement notice being issued before the actual closure date of November 30, 2023, was confirmed.

It has seen the extraction of around 11 million tons of coal between 2007 and 2023.

The key elements of the revised restoration plan include:

A mound in the northern part of the site which is visible from parts of Merthyr and sections of the Heads of Valley Road, A4060 and surrounding area, would be reduced in height, re-profiled and grass seeded
Sections of exposed rock on the western side of the mound would be kept as open scree and as a geological feature for visual amenity and providing potential habitat for lichens and mosses as well as possibly a suitable location for breeding birds such as raven and peregrine.

Two other mounds would remain largely as they appear today, and the lower slopes grass seeded and planted with native tree species.

Old reservoirs, dams and leats that remain from previous phases of mining activity, including the Dowlais free drainage system, would be kept and improved for biodiversity. Other water bodies such as settlement lagoons used in the earlier phases of Ffos y Fran would also be kept and protected.

The groundwater lake that has formed naturally in the main void would be kept with shallow banks and margins around the shores of the lake. The surrounding slopes of the lake would be “re-profiled” and planted with native trees to form a mixed woodland.

Demolition and removal of existing buildings associated with the operational mine such as workshops used for vehicle maintenance and storage of materials such as fuel and machinery would be demolished and removed from the site.

A proportion of the site would be returned to urban common as rough grazing land which would require areas to be fenced off.

Areas outside the urban common would be prepared for habitats to be created with grassland, woodland, open cliff, wetland, flushes and heath.

Land adjacent to A4060 would be “re-profiled” to provide potential for future light industrial use and grass seeded for general amenity until opportunities for development come forward.

Creation of a network of footpaths, public rights of way and a byway open to all traffic.

Sustainable

The application said that the approach to the restoration of former coal tips has adopted a more sustainable approach.

It said that the traditional approach to bulk earthworks in the restoration process was now considered outdated and unsustainable and more pragmatic alternatives involving less earthworks were also more affordable.

It also said that fewer bulk earthworks also reduced potential environmental risks on air quality, noise sensitive receptors and the use of carbon in the process.

The green infrastructure statement submitted with the application also said that fewer bulk earthworks could also present opportunities to restore and deliver a “more interesting and naturally biodiverse landscape.”

Restored

It said that many areas of the Ffos-y-Fran site had already been progressively restored or remained dormant and undisturbed for some time, adding that these areas were starting to show signs of nature recovery.

The green infrastructure statement said that wetland habitats had developed around the margins of ponds and watercourses, evidence of great crested newts had been recorded (in 2024) in over half the ponds on site, southern marsh orchids had colonised in some of the wetland and peregrine falcons had been seen flying over the site.

It said: “To implement the original and consented scheme would require significant bulk earthworks, the removal of existing ponds and wetlands and inevitable potential disruption to the local environment.”

The statement said: “The alternative final restoration scheme presents an opportunity to change and improve the approved scheme by implementing a pragmatic and sustainable alternative with significantly less adverse environmental effects and more opportunities for biodiversity enhancements.

“The approved scheme does not align well with new approaches to nature conservation or national planning policies. To implement the approved scheme would see the destruction of waterbodies and wetland habitat that developed on the site during the operating period and that now support nature recovery with minimal interventions.

“The footprint of the final restoration strategy is significantly less than the approved scheme with just over an eighth of the overall site being affected by most of the earthworks needed for the restoration. This can be delivered in works packages at the most appropriate times of year and due to its seasonal nature is a more flexible approach than a bulk earthworks programme associated with previous land reclamation projects such as would be required by the original approved scheme.

“The alternative final restoration strategy aligns well with the Step-Wise approach advocated in Planning Policy Wales (12th Edition) by avoiding and minimising potential loss and damage to elements of biodiversity while promoting opportunities for mitigation.”

It added that the alternative restoration scheme has many environmental merits and can offer and deliver substantial environmental benefits when compared to the approved scheme.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Robert Griffin
Robert Griffin
10 hours ago

So, in a nutshell, the new plan is to do almost nothing, claim this is a good thing, and do the absolute minimum to claim the £15 million that is available for restoration, and make a profit from this as well. Congratulations to the Council, the Welsh Government and all the other enforcement agencies for achieving nothing.

Linda Jones
Linda Jones
10 hours ago

I would like to know the extent to which this mine has benefitted the people of Merthyr and who will pay for the clean ip?

Steve
Steve
10 hours ago

Why don’t they use it at first as a place to dump the tip safety removal spoil.

Frank
Frank
6 hours ago

Sorry, but can someone please clarify who is footing the bill for all this work. Is the company, who extracted 11,000,000 tons of coal, paying to reinstate the site or is it the taxpayer? I have read the article twice and I cannot see a clear reference to who’s paying.

Robert Griffin
Robert Griffin
11 minutes ago
Reply to  Frank

The mining company was obliged to retain sufficient funds for the full restoration of the site – it was originally a ‘restoration’ project, although nobody believed that. The actual funds retained, £15 million, are woefully short of what’s needed. But, like every other planning condition imposed on Ffosyfran, the Council didn’t enforce it, and have allowed the company to retain the £15 million. So the company has come up with a plan that will just about justify them keeping the money, but is in effect close to nothing.

Frank
Frank
3 hours ago

I know of quite a few open cast sites that have been “restored” or “reinstated” to their original state but they have all ended up looking like parched prairies.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.