Support our Nation today - please donate here

‘Significant reservations’ about new proposed voting system – Senedd Committee

19 Jan 2024 4 minute read
The chamber – Senedd Cymru Welsh Parliament

The Welsh Government’s proposals to change the voting system by the next Senedd election could see voter choice being trumped by political party influence, according to a Senedd Committee.

A majority of the Reform Bill Committee, who are scrutinising the plans put forward by the Welsh Government, agree with the general principles of the Bill.

However, the whole Committee is united in concerns that the closed list voting system could reduce voter choice.

The current closed list proposals would mean that voters would only be able to choose between specific candidates standing for a political party, or between parties and independent candidates.

The Committee heard evidence from numerous experts that this would reduce the choice available to voters and risk voter dissatisfaction.

Flexible lists

While the Committee stopped short of recommending an alternative voting system, it did see merits in open or flexible lists or the Single Transferable Vote (STV) system.

Open or flexible lists allow political parties to prioritise their candidates, but voters are still able to choose which specific candidate on a party’s list they want to support; whereas STV allows voters to rank candidates in their own preferred order.

The Committee’s report urges all Members of the Senedd to work together to reach agreement on amendments to the proposed voting system.

David Rees, MS, Chair of the Reform Bill Committee said: “The Reform Bill Committee has spent the last few months carefully scrutinising proposals for some of the most significant changes to Welsh democracy since devolution.

“We are united in our concerns about the impact of the voting system being put forward by the Welsh Government on the level of voters’ ability to choose who represents them.

“Getting the electoral system right is fundamental to the health of democracy in Wales, and we have significant reservations about whether closed list elections represent a positive step forward.

“If the Bill is voted through its first stage by the Senedd at the end of the month, we’re urging all political parties to work together to ensure the electoral system in the Bill provides greater voter choice and improved accountability for future Members to their electorates.”

The report calls for a public information campaign about the electoral reforms, particularly the new electoral system, if any changes to the current system are introduced.


The Senedd Cymru (Members and Elections) Bill also proposes to increase the number of Members from 60 to 96. Although most of the Committee were content with this proposal, one Member did not believe any increase was justified.

Evidence given to the Committee argued that the Senedd’s responsibilities in areas such as transport, economic development, rail and taxation had increased since 1999 and that more Members are required to provide a good level of scrutiny.

The Committee heard that more representatives would improve the institution’s capacity and afford greater opportunity for Members of the Senedd to specialise and develop expertise.

The Bill will now be debated in the Senedd on 30 January, where Members will vote on whether it will proceed to the next stage of scrutiny.

David Rees MS added: “Although the Committee is not unanimous on the issue of more Members, most of the Committee’s members are persuaded by the evidence that reform is needed and that a larger Senedd will be better able to fulfil its responsibilities to the people of Wales, now and in the future.”

The Senedd’s Finance Committee has scrutinised the costs associated with expanding the Senedd since the Bill was introduced last year.

Although the Finance Committee is broadly content with the costings and savings that have been laid out, their report finds that there needs to be better modelling to try and estimate the specific costs and potential savings of the reforms especially considering changes to constituencies could increase Members’ travel or accommodation spend.

The Committee is also concerned about the Welsh Government’s assertion that increasing the number of Ministers wouldn’t lead to more staff costs and is calling for more evidence to back up the claim.

Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
6 months ago

Closed Lists…you just can’t trust them for a second…

6 months ago

I do wonder if this closed list is being dictated to Labour in Cymru from London, as we have seen London bypassing local party wishes to impose candidates for elections. I hope that the views of this committee and warnings of voter dissatisfaction are heeded, and this system dumped. We need more people voting, to give a fairer picture of what the people want, and possibly end the current ” one party state” we appear to have with the current FPTP system.

6 months ago
Reply to  Gareth

Interesting. It might be a way of closing the door on Labour’s more indy minded or Left members from standing. Either way, it’s a terrible system. IMHO STV is the way. Any system that allows human gherkins like ARTD to be gifted a seat must be put in the bin.

Ernie The Smallholder
Ernie The Smallholder
6 months ago
Reply to  Annibendod

Lets hope it backfires on them :

As all those 50% of Wales independence supporting labour switch their support to Plaid Cymru.

It happened in Scotland.

Richard E
Richard E
6 months ago

The message is clear ! Scrap the party luvies list method !
Each MS needs to be a Person
NOT a Puppet 🤡

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.