Starmer denies misleading the public over tax rises in Labour manifesto
Sir Keir Starmer has denied misleading the public at the general election over tax plans for the Budget after he suggested that people who make money from shares and property could face greater levies.
The Prime Minister rejected claims he was waging a “war on middle Britain” amid speculation he could increase the burden for those who have income from assets.
Pledged
Labour had pledged in its manifesto to not hike taxes on what it described as “working people,” explicitly ruling out increases to VAT, national insurance, and income tax.
But asked to define the term during a broadcast interview in Samoa, Sir Keir said it was someone who “goes out and earns their living, usually paid in a sort of monthly cheque” and who cannot “write a cheque to get out of difficulties”.
At a press conference at the end of the Commonwealth heads of government meeting (Chogm) in Samoa on Saturday, the Prime Minister was asked whether he was “plotting a war on middle Britain”.
“No. Let me clear about that,” he said. “What we’re doing is two things in the Budget. The first is fixing the foundations, which is dealing with the inheritance that we’ve got, including the £22 billion black hole.
“We have to deal with that. In the past leaders have walked past those problems, created fictions, and I’m not prepared to do that.”
Misled
Asked whether he had misled the public in the Labour manifesto, the Prime Minister responded: “No, we were very clear about the tax rises that we would necessarily have to make, whatever the circumstances, and you’ve listed them there, and I listed them, I don’t know how many times in the campaign.
“We were equally clear in the manifesto and in the campaign that we wouldn’t be increasing taxes on working people, and spelt out what we meant by that in terms of income tax, in terms of NICs and in terms of VAT and we intend to keep the promises that we made in our manifesto.”
It comes after the Prime Minister told Sky News he does not consider people who have an income from assets such as shares of property to be working people, paving the way for potential tax rises.
“They wouldn’t come within my definition,” he said.
Clarified
In a partial climbdown on Sir Keir’s position, Downing Street clarified on Friday that those who hold a small amount of savings in stocks and shares still count as working people.
The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said Sir Keir meant someone who primarily gets their income from assets in his interview.
Ministers have resisted going in to the fine detail of next week’s Budget, but sources have indicated she will seek to find £40 billion in tax hikes and spending cuts in order to avoid a return to austerity in next Wednesday’s fiscal statement.
Capital gains tax, inheritance tax and fuel duty are among some of the levers Chancellor Rachel Reeves could potentially pull to raise revenue as she seeks to put the economy on a firmer footing.
Reports
The Times reported she is also expected to hike employer national insurance by up to two percentage points and cut the earnings threshold at which employers pay contributions – measures that would raise a combined total of around £20 billion.
Rachel Reeves has admitted she will raise some taxes, pointing to a £22 billion black hole in the public finances which she says she discovered had been left behind by her Tory predecessors after entering office, but has not specified which ones.
In an interview with LBC on Friday evening, the Chancellor said she would avoid increasing “the key taxes that working people pay – national insurance, income tax and VAT.”
Her opposite number, Jeremy Hunt, said raising employer NICs would amount to a “jobs tax” that will “harm businesses” and break Labour’s manifesto pledge.
The shadow chancellor said: “Raising employer NICs is a jobs tax that is paid by working people. Not only will it harm businesses, it will also mean fewer jobs and lower wages.”
The Budget will be delivered on October 30.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
He is at war with Logic itself…
Why assume that? Clark of Kent has a mind of his own that works independently, free of the normal constraints, respect for humanity, the basic cardinal points of an ethical compass, he seems bereft of empathy and compassion, with a towering arrogance of self-righteousness…
A fitting companion for Trump, I hope he enjoyed his cheese burger…
So, to summarise, income from assets should be taxed like income from work.
The gain hasn’t been taxed. And the conclusion in the right leaning media seems to be that people whose main income is derived from capital gains are also hard working people.
The income used for the gain has. I suppose if it was pissed up the wall. That would be preferable
Which is why only the gain is taxed. But not as income, even though it is income for many hard working people. That’s a bit strange when you think about it. Why should one group of hard working people enjoy a discount tax rate on their income that other hard working people don’t?
Because they have been prudent.
What does that mean? Plenty of working people are prudent with household finances. Why should they not be rewarded with discounted tax rates?
Misleading the world…what bit of SEAC are our imaginary ships including the RFA going to patrol…or off to join the other ‘Forgotten Fleet’ in the Pacific…
H.M.S Prince of Wales and H.M.S Repulse and 842 men 10th Dec 1941! RIP…
Turn a blind eye … how dare they turn that sentiment on its head…buffoons in no 10, what do they teach in Cork schools?…
Of course he denies it we just don’t understand what he meant to say when he says something, lawyers always looking for a get out clause.
How do you define “working people”?
Red wall.
That’s not a definition as you well know so I’ll assume you don’t think those lying by the pool while the divies drop into the bank account are working people.
Load of cobblers spoken about “working people” when Starmer and Reeves know very well that they need to be far more effective in collecting from the very rich. Close loopholes and opaque “devices” which enrich accountants, lawyers and their clients. The way forward is clear but they won’t do it because they are committed to looking after their elite friends.
They won’t do it because tax efficiently hiding the world’s ill-gotten gains is the only post-Brexit growth success story. It was the reason the superrich globalists funded the Brexit vanity project, because the EU was gunning for the tax avoiders.
Raising employer NI is just a delayed increase in employee NI. It is just one part of the overall cost of employing staff and will be reflected in future offered wage rates and wage negotiations. i.e.it will be passed on to the employee in due course.
You could say that about any taxes businesses pay such as business rates, or fuel and alcohol duties which must come out of the margin used to pay wages for logistics and hospitality businesses respectively.