Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Starmer faces possible probe over clothing donations to his wife

15 Sep 2024 2 minute read
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer with his wife Victoria, on day three of the Betfred St Leger Festival at Doncaster Racecourse. Photo: PA

Sir Keir Starmer is alleged to have broken parliamentary rules by failing to declare donations of clothing for his wife Victoria Starmer.

The gifts, from prominent Labour donor Lord Alli, were not initially declared in the register of MPs’ interests.

The Sunday Times reported that the Prime Minister approached the parliamentary authorities on Tuesday to make a late declaration after being given updated advice on what needed to be registered.

The Tories demanded a full investigation into the Starmers’ links with prominent Labour donor Lord Alli.

The Sunday Times reported the donations covered the cost of a personal shopper, clothes and alterations for Lady Starmer both before and after Labour’s election win in July.

MPs are required to register gifts and donations within 28 days.

Number 10

A No 10 spokeswoman said: “We sought advice from the authorities on coming to office.

“We believed we had been compliant, however, following further interrogation this month, we have declared further items.”

The guide to the Commons rules states MPs should register “any benefit given to any third party, whether or not this accompanied a benefit for him or her, if the Member is aware, or could reasonably be expected to be aware, of the benefit and that it was given because of his or her membership of the House or parliamentary or political activities”.

Lord Alli’s involvement with the Labour leader has already proved controversial after it emerged he had been given a Downing Street security pass without apparently having a government role.

The row was dubbed the “passes for glasses” affair because Lord Alli has previously donated tens of thousands of pounds worth of clothing, accommodation and “multiple pairs” of spectacles to the Labour leader.

A Conservative Party spokesman said: “It’s taken just 10 weeks for Keir Starmer to face an investigation for his conduct.

“After facing allegations of cronyism and now apparent serious breaches of parliamentary rules there must be a full investigation into the passes for glasses scandal.

“No doubt the millions of vulnerable pensioners across the country who face choosing between heating and eating would jump at the chance for free clothes just to keep warm in the face of Labour’s cruel cut.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Welsh Patriot
Welsh Patriot
3 months ago

Is this the start of Labour Sleaze?

hdavies15
hdavies15
3 months ago

Starmer’s taste for freebies will soon be up there ( or down, depending on perspective) with the infamous Boris who would take from anyone daft enough to give.

Marc
Marc
3 months ago

The Torys demand an enquiry about a late declaration. How about these three letters PPE !

Jeff
Jeff
3 months ago

So there should be a check that rules have not been breeched, but times again. But there have been plenty of “accidentally late” entries and no one bleeped at it.

Are they (the times) checking into Johnson new job along with Charlotte Owen in Better Earth and how that happened?

Dewi
Dewi
3 months ago

A man said to be a millionaire receiving tens thousands of pounds to purchase clothing and specs for himself and cash for his wife’s clothing says everything about Labour and their cut of £300 winter fuel allowance for pensioners. Starmer is reaching the same low level as Boris – sleezy, greedy and corrupt !

Why vote
Why vote
3 months ago

What are the tax implications for Starmer, is it classed as unearned income or labour donations or tax free.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.