Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Starmer: hopes for reset with EU do not mean ‘reversing Brexit’

28 Aug 2024 4 minute read
Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks to members of the media following a joint press conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Photo Justin Tallis/PA Wire

Sir Keir Starmer insisted he was not “reversing Brexit” as he set out plans for a new treaty with Germany as part of a wider “reset” of relations with the European Union.

The Prime Minister, who agreed that a deal with Germany would be in place by the end of the year following talks with counterpart Olaf Scholz, said it was a “once-in-a-generation” opportunity.

Mr Scholz said the UK and Germany were “good friends, close partners and trusted allies” as Sir Keir promised a “bright new future” for the countries’ relationship.

Sir Keir said the new UK-Germany treaty would result in “deeper links on science, technology, development, people, business, culture” and “a boost to our trading relations”.

A new defence agreement will build on the “already formidable” co-operation between the two countries, Sir Keir said.

He said the treaty was a “once-in-a-generation chance to deliver for working people in Britain and in Germany”.

“Britain can advance its interests much more effectively when we work with friends and partners.

“This treaty is part of a wider reset, grounded in a new spirit of cooperation with our shared understanding that this will be developed at pace, and that we hope to have agreed it by the end of the year.”

Illegal migration

The two countries also agreed to develop a “joint action plan to tackle illegal migration”.

Sir Keir’s hopes for the “wider reset” with the European Union would not amount to undoing the Brexit decision, he insisted.

“I’m absolutely clear that we do want a reset.

“I have been able to repeat that here today, a reset with Europe, a reset with the EU.

“That does not mean reversing Brexit or re-entering the single market or the customs union, but it does mean a closer relationship on a number of fronts, including the economy, including defence, including exchanges, but we do not have plans for a youth mobility scheme.”

An agreement on youth mobility has been suggested by Brussels and could be a key demand in any negotiations.

But that could be seen as a step towards the restoration of free movement and Sir Keir said he had “clear red lines” ahead of talks with the European Union on the future relationship.

He told reporters: “In relation to youth mobility, obviously, we’ve been really clear – no single market, no customs union, no free movement, no going back into the EU.

“So the discussion about a close relationship with the EU, is in that context and within those frameworks.

“I’m convinced, and I think you heard from the chancellor himself, that we can have a close relationship, notwithstanding those clear red lines that we’ve got and we’ve always had.”

Mr Scholz said: “We want to create good relations between the UK and the European Union, it can become better day by day, and we all share an interest.”

There was “reason to do everything in our power to improve relations between both countries but also the UK and the European Union”.

Tone

Responding to Sir Keir Starmer’s comments following the meeting with Olaf Scholz, Plaid Cymru Foreign Affairs spokesperson Ben Lake MP said: “There has been a welcome shift in tone between the UK Government and our EU partners. A shift in tone in itself, however, will not bring about substantial change for Welsh businesses, the wider economy, or young people’s future prospects.

“There needs to be an acknowledgement that small businesses are hindered by red tape that makes exporting to the European continent complex and expensive, with estimates that the additional border checks cost UK businesses up to £7.5 billion a year. Membership of the single market and customs union would eradicate these costs, and in turn boost our economy and revive vital trade links.

“The new UK Government is keen to stress that things will get worse before they improve, and it now offers young people little hope for any positive changes beyond that bleak outlook. The EU has extended opportunities that could immediately benefit young people in the UK, such as rejoining the Erasmus programme and establishing a youth mobility scheme. It is time for the Labour government to think outside the box and be ambitious in creating opportunities for our young people.”

Following his engagements in Berlin, Sir Keir was heading to Paris for the start of the Paralympics and talks with French President Emmanuel Macron, where he will continue to pursue his reset agenda.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Barry Bosman
Barry Bosman
4 months ago

The 2016 vote only asked about the political union. There was no mandate to reverse the 1975 vote on remaining in the economic partnership, aka the common market.

Adria
Adria
4 months ago
Reply to  Barry Bosman

It was a pretty clear question: leave the EU or stay in.
I voted to remain and fully understood that the vote might go against me. That’s democracy I’m afraid.

Barry Bosman
Barry Bosman
4 months ago
Reply to  Adria

Norway and Switzerland aren’t in the EU either but we were denied a similar economic partnership.

Ernie The Smallholder
Ernie The Smallholder
4 months ago
Reply to  Barry Bosman

Norway and Switzerland are members of EFTA and EEA. They are therefore in the European Single market and customs union. For Cymru to follow the UK out of EFTA and EEA has been a total disaster for the Cymru economy. It was a factor for why TATA decided to close steel production at Port Talbot. It is also causing problems in the traditional farming industry in Cymru. It is clear that Brexit has failed and caused severe problems for the Cymru economy. Cymru must rejoin the European Union. If the UK refuses, then we must leave the UK. It seems… Read more »

Adrian
Adrian
4 months ago

In a democracy you are, of course, free to campaign for those things and I wish you well.

Adrian
Adrian
4 months ago
Reply to  Barry Bosman

You weren’t ‘denied’ it, it was never offered as an option. It really wasn’t that complicated: the question was leave, or remain, and the highest number of votes was to be the decider. Watching so many grown adults have tantrums when they lost was, and still is, embarrassing. The Welsh devolution majority was 0.6%: I don’t remember any tantrums.

Last edited 4 months ago by Adrian
Barry Bosman
Barry Bosman
4 months ago
Reply to  Adrian

It wasn’t a leave or remain vote on everything to do with Europe otherwise we wouldn’t still be in UEFA, Euromillions, Euratom and Eurovision. The mandate was to leave the post-Maastricht political union, not the economic partnership. If you wanted to leave that it should’ve been on the ballot paper.

Adrian
Adrian
4 months ago
Reply to  Barry Bosman

It was a vote to leave the European Union Barry: it was pretty clear to most people. Most people understood that the singing contest, the lottery and the football tournament weren’t really part of the political or economic union.

Barry Bosman
Barry Bosman
4 months ago
Reply to  Adrian

So why weren’t people trusted with a range of choices so you could say that with absolute confidence instead of needing to gaslight.

Because Norway and Switzerland are not in the EU so their deal was an option, especially with the tight result.

Gareth
Gareth
4 months ago
Reply to  Adrian

You dont remember any tantrums, what about the abolish the assembly party, the recent ” poll ” conducted at the vale show by A R T Davies on reversing devolution, as examples of a ” tantrum”, after several votes on devolution and more powers for devolution were backed by voters.

Adrian
Adrian
4 months ago
Reply to  Gareth

I was talking about voters having tantrums Gareth: politicians are mostly idiots anyway.

Gareth
Gareth
4 months ago
Reply to  Adrian

🤣 👍

Jeff
Jeff
4 months ago

Grownups back in the room then but time for another vote. Lets get back in.

Frank
Frank
4 months ago

We’ll have to keep an eye on him. He is inclined to twist the truth.

hdavies15
hdavies15
4 months ago
Reply to  Frank

He’s already looking like a guy who thrives on being opaque. When being opaque doesn’t work, he’ll tell a lie. People compare it with Johnson’s capacity for lying, but it’s a different approach altogether. Johnson used to make it up as he went along like a big kid trying to duck punishment. This cove plans his statements well ahead so his lies smack of being calculated and deliberate. Different kind of threat but no better than the buffoon’s efforts.

Adrian
Adrian
4 months ago
Reply to  hdavies15

Excellent analysis!

Barry Bosman
Barry Bosman
4 months ago
Reply to  hdavies15

You let Johnson off the hook with a typical “boys will be boys” defence yet this is what the official Whitehall Twitter account had to say about his government:

“Arrogant And Offensive. Can You Imagine Having To Work With These Truth Twisters?”

Last edited 4 months ago by Barry Bosman
hdavies15
hdavies15
4 months ago
Reply to  Barry Bosman

Boris is history, but will we learn any lessons ? This man is different and we are having to live with him right now and for the foreseeable future. Adapt to cope with the present and future challenges, the past is done and gone.

Howie
Howie
4 months ago
Reply to  hdavies15

It’s his barrister trait of selling a story to a jury in this case the jury being electorate, but that means the story does not need to be the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

hdavies15
hdavies15
4 months ago
Reply to  Howie

barrister and bastards have much in common !

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.