Sunak eyes £50 billion tax hikes and spending cuts amid ‘massive fiscal black hole’
Rishi Sunak and Chancellor Jeremy Hunt are considering up to £50 billion of spending cuts and tax rises as they confront a gaping financial black hole ahead of the autumn budget.
The pair held a meeting on Thursday lasting more than an hour and characterised as “sober”, as they were warned economic growth is forecast to drop amid fears of a recession.
Treasury sources declined to put a figure on the savings being considered in the November 17 budget but they were believed to be looking for financial headroom of up to £10 billion.
Along with the “massive fiscal black hole” forecast of being up to £40 billion, the Prime Minister and the Chancellor were thought to be targeting up to £50 billion of cuts and hikes to fill the gap.
A Treasury source said: “Markets have calmed somewhat, but the picture remains grim. After borrowing and spending hundreds of billions of pounds due to Covid-19 and for energy bills support, there is a massive fiscal black hole to fill.
“People should not underestimate the scale of this challenge, or how tough the decisions will have to be. We’ve seen what happens when governments ignore this reality.”
The figures are not expected to be finalised until Mr Sunak and Mr Hunt receive the latest forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility.
The pair delayed the financial statement by more than two weeks from Halloween on Monday as public finances appeared in a worse shape after Liz Truss’s leadership.
Mr Hunt has sought the advice of George Osborne as he sounds out Conservative predecessors over his upcoming autumn budget.
A Treasury source said Mr Hunt met Mr Osborne, the architect of austerity in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, in Downing Street on Thursday.
Talks were also said to have been arranged with Kwasi Kwarteng, Mr Hunt’s predecessor whose mini-budget sparked the financial turmoil that forced Ms Truss from office.
Sajid Javid and Lord Hammond were also expected to be consulted.
Mr Sunak and Mr Hunt have refused to commit to the triple-lock on pensions, meaning millions could face real-terms cuts in April, as inflation soars past 10%.
The pledge of defence spending increasing to 3% of GDP by 2030 was also under review.
Mr Sunak was also not committing to Boris Johnson’s promise to raise benefits in line with inflation.
The Chancellor has pledged to get “debt falling over the medium term” and has warned of “very, very difficult decisions” being required on tax and spending.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies has warned that many departments’ spending budgets are still far below their 2010 levels in real terms, in some cases more than 25% lower, making further savings hard to come by.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
There’s money to be saved cutting the “secretaries” of NI Cymru and Alba since they don’t do anything. Similarly the office of Brexit opportunities (there aren’t any) the minister for levelling up (there has been none) and the ERG (they’ve done enough damage. No more taxpayer’s money for them), pass the cost of the recent leadership changes to the Tory party instead of charging the taxpayer, don’t pay golden parchute payments and golden pensions to the dozens of quitting / sacked Tory ministers, and don’t make the taxpayer stump up for the triple the normal amount of cronies installed with… Read more »
Well “Awaiting moderation” didn’t last long. By the first refresh of the screen my post was removed. Seems a little harsh!
EDIT: Oh and now it’s back. Might want to have a word with your hosting service NC. It’s all getting a bit glitchy
There is a line down the middle of the North Sea which divides Norway’s 78% windfall tax on oil from the UKs 65% which is costing British taxpayers £33.3Bn.
Add in the £700Bn a year profits the oil companies are salting away and there is absolutely no need for cuts to benefits, the NHS, education or even defence. It is a choice to hand billions to corporate fat cats rather than the poor and disabled.