Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Sunak urged by MPs to abandon ‘damaging’ Bill of Rights legislation

25 Jan 2023 4 minute read
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. Photo UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor

Rishi Sunak is facing calls to abandon the Government’s controversial attempt to overhaul human rights legislation amid a warning that it would seriously damage people’s ability to enforce their rights.

A cross-party committee of MPs and peers said the Bill of Rights showed a “disregard” for the UK’s international legal obligations and would lead to more cases going to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

Ministers say the Bill – which would replace the Human Rights Act which enshrines the European Convention on Human Rights in UK – is intended to curb abuses of the current system.

However the parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights said the Bill would create new barriers which make it harder for people to enforce their rights inside and outside courts.

Rather than creating a strong new legal framework, the committee said the Bill appeared to be designed to “tip the balance” in favour of the state when facing allegations of human rights violations.

It concluded the likely result would be that more people would need to go to the court in Strasbourg to enforce their rights, and that more adverse judgments were likely to be made against the UK.

“The Government should not proceed with this Bill,” the committee said.

“It weakens rights protections, it undermines the universality of rights, it shows disregard for our international legal obligations; it creates legal uncertainty and hinders effective enforcement; it will lead to an increased caseload in Strasbourg; and will damage our international reputation as guardians of human rights.”

Boris Johnson

The Bill of Rights was originally introduced under Boris Johnson by Deputy Prime Minister and Justice Secretary Dominic Raab only to be dropped by Liz Truss when she became prime minister and summarily sacked Mr Raab.

It was revived when Mr Sunak entered No 10 and Mr Raab was reappointed to his previous role, although when he appeared before the Commons Liaison Committee last month the Prime Minister refused to commit to a parliamentary timetable to bring it into law.

In its report, the committee said there appeared to be little wider support for the proposed changes, with victims of violence against women, care home residents, and those whose family members have lost their life due to the actions of the police or other state actors among those raising objections.

It expressed concern the Bill would require courts to ignore safeguards which protect people in “urgent situations” when there is a credible risk to life or of torture or inhuman or degrading treatment.

It would also impact on the requirement on public bodies to take action to protect rights, such as conducting effective investigations into the loss of life – as in the Hillsborough inquests.

Committee chair Joanna Cherry said: “Human rights are universal. A Bill of Rights should reaffirm and reinforce the fundamental rights that protect everyone in the UK, but this Bill does nothing of the sort.

“Instead, it removes and restricts certain human rights protections that the Government finds inconvenient and prescribes a restrictive approach to the interpretation and application of the European Convention on Human Rights in the courts of our domestic legal systems.

“The end result, if the Bill is enacted in its current form, will be more barriers to enforcing human rights, more cases taken to Strasbourg and more adverse judgments against the UK.”

A Ministry of Justice spokeswoman responded: “The Bill of Rights builds on the UK’s proud tradition of liberty by strengthening freedom of speech, reinjecting a healthy dose of common sense to the system and ending abuse of our laws.

“The Government was elected on a manifesto that committed to updating the Human Rights Act to ensure there is a proper balance between the rights of individuals, our vital national security and effective government – that is what we are doing.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
15 days ago

The bill for Brexit, pay-up…

Fi yn unig
Fi yn unig
15 days ago

I’m sure many people, including myself to an extent, thought I was being facetious when I have referred to the ‘British Bill of NO Rights’ but a CROSS PARTY group of MPs confirm here that is exactly what it is.

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
15 days ago

In the photo the only Tory dog not howling is Therese May…remorse?

Steve Woods
Steve Woods
15 days ago

Britannia waives the rules…. Again.

Kerry Davies
Kerry Davies
15 days ago

How stupid are these people? The HRA was passed purely to enable the NI Peace Process and Belfast Agreement. If one knew no better one might think they wanted the bombers back in English cities.

Rob
Rob
14 days ago

When the Human Rights Act was passed it was more or less a cut and paste exercise. It confined our rights enshrined by the ECHR into UK law. This made it easier for claimants to take their case to a UK court and not have to go to the European Court in Strasbourg. It should also be noted that the ECHR (European Convention on Human Rights) predates the EU & was championed non-other than Winston Churchill, whom many Brexiteers consider to be a hero. The only European countries that are not part of the ECHR are Belarus and Russia. Personally… Read more »

Last edited 14 days ago by Rob

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.