Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Test case imminent on whether councillors or developers should decide how many new homes should be built

14 Oct 2024 4 minute read
Plaid Cymru Wrexham group leader Marc Jones

Martin Shipton

A case to be heard at the Court of Appeal in London on Tuesday 15 October could decide whether democracy or developers have the most say on local planning policy in Wales.

Marc Jones, who leads the Plaid Cymru group on Wrexham council, is challenging a High Court judgement that councillors broke the law when they rejected a Local Development Plan (LDP) foisted on them by a Welsh Government inspector.

Together with council colleagues who also voted against the LDP, Cllr Jones – who is also the national Chair of Plaid Cymru – was threatened that he could be jailed for contempt of court if he continued to block the LDP.

‘Complicated’

He told Nation.Cymru: “It’s a complicated case, but the issue is quite simple. Should it be democratically elected councillors who decide on the amount of housing development that is appropriate in their local authority area, or should developers be calling the shots?

“Wrexham council is the only council in the UK to have refused to adopt its own LDP – twice. The reason is that it would have involved building two new giant housing estates on either side of the town – 1500 on the Ruthin Road and 1680 on the Cefn Rd – without any additional infrastructure. The developers are even quibbling about section 106 contributions to building new schools to accommodate the new population.

“We believed there was no need to build houses on green field sites, and were concerned that green spaces between villages outside Wrexham itself should not be filled in with housing. But the Welsh Government said the population was expected to rise by 20%, which would have made it impossible to avoid building on green field sites and between villages.

“What has made the situation even more ridiculous is that the case for more house building in the LDP was based on grossly exaggerated predictions about the growth in the local population. The 20% rise was later revised downwards to 10%, and the latest prediction is that the population will remain fairly static.”

Private developments

Cllr Jones said that, nevertheless, developers had been keen to see the LDP adopted so that they would be able to make successful planning applications for private developments. ”Another concern is that the proportion of affordable homes that are proposed to be built is pretty low at 9%,” he said.

“The pressure councillors have been put under has been intolerable and unacceptable,” said Cllr Jones. “We believe that we are best placed to decide on the needs of our communities, but that was taken out of our hands.

“Mr Justice Lewison has ruled that our case, which is being funded through a crowdfunder and local donations, can go forward to the Court of Appeal after a consortium of seven housing developers (including Redrow, Barratt Homes and Bloor Homes – the big boys) took the council to Judicial Review for twice refusing to vote for its own LDP. Under threat of imprisonment, councillors voted at the third time of asking in December for the LDP. The Plaid group abstained in that third vote.

“The Welsh Government backed the developers and Wrexham council failed to even defend the democratic vote in court.”

“But many councillors elsewhere are seeing this as a big test case. We’ve been contacted by people from elsewhere in Wales but also from England. It really does go to the heart of what local democracy is all about. Fighting the case has taken up a lot of time and energy, but we felt we didn’t have any choice. It’s an important battle.”

In granting Cllr Jones leave to appeal, Mr Justice Lewison stated: “I am satisfied that … the proposed appeal (a) has a real prospect of success and (b) raises an important point of principle.”

Cllr Jones said: “We’ve funded the case through crowdfunding, and are very grateful to everyone who has contributed. We believe we have a good case and hope we win. If we do, the council will be left without an LDP and the situation will have to be looked at again.”

The case is scheduled to last for two days.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Linda Jones
Linda Jones
24 days ago

Shocking the Welsh government are trying to force an LDP on the people of Wrexham despite the high level opposition to it. Its typical of the top down approach of the Labour party in riding roughshod over local democracy.

The LDP forced on Wrexham just doesn’t add up. Why build thousands of houses in a place that doesn’t need them with no infrastructure and a tiny number of affordable homes in the mix? Brown envelopes come to mind

Jeannette Bassford-Barton
Jeannette Bassford-Barton
24 days ago
Reply to  Linda Jones

Spot on good to hear someone from this area with the hands on full knowledge commenting. Thank you. Yes a grrat lack of affordable homes no help for the younger generations & families plus huge extortionate private rentals. When I raised the point of a better road down to South Wales e.g. dual carriageway Lesley Griffiths lWrexham Labour MS decried this saying ” no who wants a motorway going through our beautiful mountains” not looking at the point of deliveries of food etc. To mid. Wales & beyond. Also Wrexham has been earmarked. as one of 4 Cities in Wales… Read more »

hdavies15
hdavies15
24 days ago

Wales Gov and London regime of any colour regard Wrexham as an outlying satellite of the Greater Merseyside “province”. So any links will be in that direction. Linking Wrexham with the rest of Wales will be contrary to the assumptions of the Greater England vision of our rulers. Booting Tories out does nothing to remove that threat.

Owain Morgan
Owain Morgan
24 days ago

Using a propaganda term like “Illegal Immigrants” and calling Llanelli a city, whether it should be or not, it isn’t. You make good points, but then use factually innacurate terms 🙄😒 Please refrain from using right wing propaganda, it invalidates everything else you have to say 🤨

Barnaby
Barnaby
24 days ago

It’s not clear how an LDP can leave councillors no control over what is built and where. It’s reasonable to require councils to build a certain number of new homes but not to force them to accept specific developments. Also any targets should consider new homes built in the last decade. It’s not fair for laggard councils to benefit from their heel dragging.

Karl
Karl
24 days ago

Will this work either way. From articles I have read, the issue is often planning permission granted and a developer sits on the land until worth selling, without building anything. Surely showing neither the developer or council arre doing a good job.

Ap Kenneth
Ap Kenneth
23 days ago

An LPD should not be set in stone but should be amenable when more up to date information, such as population becomes available. The council should also be able to determine the types of housing and not have a majority of 3& 4 bed detached, being the most profitable.
The housing being forced on Wrexham is to provide housing for Cheshire it is not about local needs.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.