Support our Nation today - please donate here

Top European judge warns UK Government not to ignore Rwanda scheme court orders

25 Jan 2024 3 minute read
Home Secretary James Cleverly during a press conference with Rwandan Minister of Foreign Affairs Vincent Biruta after the signing of the new treaty in Kigali, Rwanda. Photo Ben Birchall/PA Wire

Rishi Sunak has been warned he will be breaking European human rights law if his Government ignores emergency court orders intended to stop asylum seekers being sent to Rwanda.

The Prime Minister has repeatedly vowed not to let “foreign courts” block the plan to send some migrants on a one-way trip to the African nation.

The Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill going through Parliament states that it is up to ministers to decide whether or not to comply with interim rulings issued by judges in the European Court of Human Rights.

But the Strasbourg court’s president, Siofra O’Leary, said “there is a clear legal obligation” under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) for states to comply with the so-called Rule 39 interim measures.

‘Pyjama injunction’

A Rule 39 measure – branded a “pyjama injunction” by critics because it can be issued outside normal court hours – contributed to the 2022 grounding of the first flight intended to take asylum seekers to Rwanda under the Government’s controversial scheme.

The new legislation going through Parliament seeks to address the legal challenges which have dogged the scheme and states that ministers have the power to ignore such rulings.

But Ms O’Leary told a press conference: “There is a clear legal obligation under the Convention for states to comply with Rule 39 measures.“

She said the interim measures are only issued “in exceptional circumstances where there is a real and imminent risk of irreparable harm”.

Countries which have failed to comply with Rule 39 indications have previously been found to have violated obligations under Article 34 of the ECHR, which gives the right for individuals to apply to the court once domestic legal routes have been exhausted.

Senior judge Ms O’Leary said the UK “has always complied with Rule 39 measures”, except in one very particular case, and has “publicly declared the need for other states to comply with Rule 39 indications” – including urging Vladimir Putin’s Russia to abide by a 2021 measure in relation to the release of opposition leader Alexei Navalny.

The Strasbourg court president would not be drawn on the Safety of Rwanda Bill while it goes through the parliamentary process.

But she said: “I know there’s a very healthy debate in the United Kingdom relating to the content of the Bill.

“It’s a country which is blessed with many, many international legal experts and a very active civil society. So I am sure that all of those issues can be fully examined.”

In the Rwanda case in June 2022, the interim measure blocking an Iraqi asylum seeker being sent to the African state was granted just hours before the flight was due to take off.


Ms O’Leary said Rule 39 measures are almost always sought in “situations of urgency, if not extreme urgency, and the nature of the urgency or the degree of urgency is something which respondent governments control”.

The interim injunction powers are rarely used – in 2023 13 requests were refused, and just one interim measure was granted.

The Rule 39 process is currently being reformed and since December 2023 the duty judge issuing an interim measure will be identified, addressing one of the criticisms of the situation in the Rwanda case.

Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
5 months ago

Hey Bluto, did you enjoy pretending to force people onto wingless aeroplanes at our great expense?

Got a new job lined-up yet, shame there won’t be a Popeye sequel…

RIP Robin Williams…

5 months ago

This the Cleverly in the pic above that joked about using a rape drug on his wife and Sunak thinks it is OK?

Really, the state of the UK and the Tory party choose this hill to die on.

Dai Ponty
Dai Ponty
5 months ago

The Tory Scum have always been arrogant but now they think they are above international law if they go ahead as i think they will they should be chucked out of the five country U N security council and chucked out of the U N

5 months ago

The entire Rwanda “solution” has been riddled with flaws all along at the UK end of things. On top of those flaws Rwanda presents a very dubious choice as a destination for anyone regardless of circumstance. Read this article from AlJazeeera on line to learn a bit more about how Rwanda fosters violence and corruption among its near neighbours.
The UK cannot ignore the crisis in DRC | Opinions | Al Jazeera

Hardly a sound choice unless you want to exterminate a bunch of unwanted visitors!.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.