UK Government cuts £1.3bn of tech and AI funding
Photo Justin Tallis/PA Wire
The new Labour UK Government has shelved £1.3 billion of “unfunded” investment for tech and AI projects promised by the previous Conservative government.
The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) said no new funding for the programmes had been allocated in the previous government’s spending plans, and therefore will not be taken forward.
It included £800 million for the creation of an exascale supercomputer at the University of Edinburgh and £500 million of additional funding for the AI Research Resource, a scheme which helps fund computing power for AI.
An additional £300 million committed to the AI Research Resource has been committed to, the Government said, as this funding was already in place, has been distributed and will continue as planned.
“We are absolutely committed to building technology infrastructure that delivers growth and opportunity for people across the UK,” a DSIT spokesman said.
“The Government is taking difficult and necessary spending decisions across all departments in the face of billions of pounds of unfunded commitments.
“This is essential to restore economic stability and deliver our national mission for growth.”
The Government said it was pulling together its own plans to invest in compute infrastructure as part of the development of its AI Opportunities Action Plan, which is being led by industry expert Matt Clifford, who played a leading role in organising the AI Safety Summit at Bletchley Park last year.
“We have launched the AI Opportunities Action Plan which will identify how we can bolster our compute infrastructure to better suit our needs and consider how AI and other emerging technologies can best support our new industrial strategy,” the DSIT spokesman said.
Andrew Griffith, the Conservatives’ shadow science, innovation and technology secretary, accused Labour of having “lower ambitions” for the UK’s tech sector.
Spending
In a post on X, formerly Twitter, he said: “If Labour have lower ambitions for UK tech sector – or the new Secretary of State cannot get the same level of support for DSIT from the Chancellor – that’s up to them but no one should be fooled by Labour trying to blame their predecessors.
“We increased public spending on research to a record £20 billion a year for 2024/25 and unlike Labour, we committed to increase that by a further 10% in our manifesto.
“AI and Exascale compute were both beneficiaries of this increased funding.”
The future of the exascale supercomputer project remains unclear, with the University of Edinburgh having already spent £31 million on a new wing of its advanced computing facility, which was purpose-built to house the supercomputer.
It had expected to begin the first phase of installing it in 2025, according to the university’s website.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
I thought Labour are desperately trying to grow the UK economy?
Cutting AI and Tech spending is not exactly the best way to go about this!
This is just seen as trying to excise projects that are not Labour created, the UK creates funding in the financial year to deliver some projects Labour trying to hoodwink the electorate with this ploy, more payback settlements in Public Sector required by unions?
Better to cut unfunded projects than go for pie in the sky ideas without the cash to back them. All available money needs to go to houses for deprived people and cutting child poverty. And remember, these are UK projects. How much benefit would Wales get. We need projects scaled to a Wales-capable level. Let’s face it, we’ll neverbe AI leaders, but Wales could lead in niche fields.
Hunt wanted AI to cut thousands of public sector jobs and use in the NHS to replace people. That would be the intent of the conservative investment. and it had mates rates written all over it. Cut it, but rethink direction.
They really do not have a clue do they? I imagine the only thing they will not cut is their own salary/pension or expenses!