Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Welsh and Scottish ministers slam UK Government plan to scrap Human Rights Act

02 Mar 2022 3 minutes Read
Scottish flag by M W from Pixabay. Wales flag by Senedd Cymru.

Welsh and Scottish ministers have described the UK Government’s plans to replace the Human Rights Act with a Bill of Rights as an “ideologically motivated attack on freedoms and liberties.”

The Welsh and Scottish Governments have called on Boris Johnson’s Conservative administration to listen to evidence from civil society and the legal profession and reverse its proposals.

The ministers from the devolved governments have said they have “grave and deep-seated concerns” concerns about the move, and have warned that it could take away protections such as “free speech and the right to protest”.

The UK Government is currently consulting on plans to replace the Human Rights Act with a Bill of Rights.

This despite its own Independent Review of Human Rights finding no good case for making significant changes.

The joint call comes ahead of an event later today organised by the Human Rights Consortium in Northern Ireland, the Human Rights Consortium Scotland and the Wales Civil Society Forum.

The event will have contributions from devolved governments and civil society experts from across the UK.

The joint statement, by Jane Hutt, Minister for Social Justice, Mick Antoniw, Counsel General and Minister for the Constitution from the Welsh Government, and Christina McKelvie, Minister for Equalities and Older People in the Scottish Government, said: “We have grave and deep-seated concerns in relation to both the current proposals and the UK Government’s longer-term direction of travel.

“The Human Rights Act plays a critically important role in protecting fundamental human rights across the whole of the United Kingdom. For more than two decades it has benefitted individual members of society and ensured public institutions respect, protect and fulfil human rights.

‘Free speech’ 

“The achievements made possible by the Act encompass everything from action on women’s equality to the protection of free speech and the right to protest.

“It has assisted the families of service personnel to obtain justice when their rights were breached, helped secure equality on issues for LGBTQ+ people, and ensured scandals involving medical malpractice and the abuse of vulnerable patients could be publicly exposed, and supported people to challenge unfair welfare policies such as the bedroom tax.

“The Act has also been of central importance in the fight for justice following the Hillsborough disaster, and the successful challenge brought by victims of the ‘black cab rapist’ in the face of serious failings by the Metropolitan Police. And it is sobering to reflect on how a weakened Human Rights Act could have led to the deportation of yet more members of the Windrush generation.

“The Independent Human Rights Act Review concluded there was no good case for making significant changes to the Act as it currently exists based on the extensive evidence it received from some of the United Kingdom’s most eminent legal experts.

“Disregarding that weight of evidence and expertise to press ahead with plans can only be interpreted as an ideologically motivated attack on the freedoms and liberties protected by the Human Rights Act.

“The proposals for a ‘modern Bill of Rights’ are both unwelcome and unnecessary. We are very clear that the interests of people in Scotland and Wales are best protected by retaining the Human Rights Act in its current form.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GW Atkinson
GW Atkinson
2 months ago

While the English government bang on about human rights on the world stage to apease their peers in the West, they pull this fascism in private at home. How is this any different to what Putin would do?

Kerry Davies
Kerry Davies
2 months ago

In 2015, after two years of graft, the department headed by Michael Gove was told to stop work on the Bill of Rights until the government had scrapped all devolution, several Wales and Scotland Acts and the USA’s beloved Good Friday Agreement. They then asked how much those two years had achieved and he gave them the title of a Bill which they rejected as constitutionally illegal. That’s all they had, a title and that was unacceptable. Gove was moved to greener pastures and his consultation due in November 2015 was launched in December 2021. So far the idea of… Read more »

I.Humphrys
I.Humphrys
2 months ago

Surely, the English Bill Of Rights is extant? Dogs dinner served now, come and get it!

Mr Williams
Mr Williams
2 months ago

The Human Rights Act brings the European Convention of Human Rights into the UK legal system.

Only Belarus is a non-member.

Does the UK Government seriously want to be listed alongside President Lukashenko??

Last edited 2 months ago by Mr Williams

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.