Support our Nation today - please donate here

Welsh Secretary led opposition to ‘British Bill of Rights’ shelved by Liz Truss

08 Sep 2022 4 minute read
New Welsh Secretary Robert Buckland. Photo Jonathan Brady PA Images. Liz Truss. Photo Rob Pinney PA Images

A proposed British Bill of Rights, which was aimed at replacing the Human Rights Act, was shelved by Liz Truss’s Government after discussions with the new Welsh Secretary Robert Buckland.

The Bill of Rights Bill, championed by former justice secretary Dominic Raab, who left the cabinet this week, had been due to have its first Commons test on September 12.

According to the Financial Times, the bill was shelved after discussions between the new prime minister, Liz Truss, as well as Brandon Lewis, the new justice secretary, and Sir Robert Buckland, the Wales secretary and a former justice secretary.

Robert Buckland had warned last month that the proposed reforms could risk politicising courts and cause US-style rows.

“Already, there is talk about an amendment to create a ‘right’ to abortion,” he wrote in the Telegraph.

“Whatever people’s views may be about this sensitive subject, Parliament has already legislated for it and its elevation into a ‘right’ risks bringing our courts into the political arena, as in the United States.

“What about socio-economic ‘rights’ to work and receive benefits, so beloved by the Left? All these could be tagged on to this ‘Christmas Tree’ Bill, like outsized baubles.”

A Government source said the bill was “unlikely to progress in its current form”, with the new administration “reviewing the most effective means to deliver the objectives of the Bill as a whole”.

The “principles and objectives more generally (are) not shelved”, the source said.


The legislation has been highly controversial.

Stephanie Boyce, president of the Law Society which represents solicitors in England and Wales, said the Bill of Rights “needs a complete rethink as the current draft represents a lurch backwards for British justice which would disempower people in Britain while giving the state more unfettered authority”.

The Scottish Government said the legislation is “harmful and unwelcome”, while United Nations experts said it seeks to repeal and replace the Human Rights Act of 1998 “in a concerning manner”.

The legislation was aimed at ensuring that domestic courts do not always need to follow case law from Strasbourg and that the Supreme Court in London is the ultimate decision-maker on human rights issues.

It would confirm that interim measures such as the one issued over the Rwanda policy are not binding on UK courts.

The legislation would have also created a “permission stage” in human rights cases where claimants must show they have suffered significant damage before proceedings can go ahead, to block “trivial” legal actions.

It was intended to restrict the circumstances in which foreign-born people convicted of crimes are able to argue their right to family life trumps public safety in a bid to prevent their removal from the UK.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said: “As is the case whenever a new Government is formed, there is a review of cross-departmental priorities to ensure they are the most effective way of delivering the Government’s objectives.”


During the Tory leadership campaign, Ms Truss promised a strengthened Bill of Rights to provide a “sound legal basis” to tackle illegal migration.

“We need to make sure that the British Bill of Rights fully delivers on giving the UK Government the powers and UK Parliament the sovereignty to be able to deliver the policy in full,” she said.

Downing Street declined to guarantee that a new Bill of Rights will be introduced during the current Parliament.

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “A new Secretary of State will consider all policies in their area; that will include ongoing Bills proceeding through Parliament. This is no different.”

Laura Trevelyan, Amnesty International UK’s human rights in the UK campaign manager, said: “The prospect of the Human Rights Act being watered down or even ripped up entirely was genuinely disturbing for anyone who cares about rights and justice.

“We very much hope that Liz Truss consigns any suggestion of scrapping the Human Rights Act to the bonfire of history and that this Government places a renewed focus on protecting and celebrating human rights, both here and across the world.”

Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fi yn unig
Fi yn unig
1 year ago

Taken at face value, I have to give credit to Buckland if he is responsible for stopping the destruction of our human rights BUT this is the sly Tory party we’re talking about here. It could be a ruse to throw us off the scent. Keep watching. It may proceed by stealth.

1 year ago

I think the important part of that article is where it states, it is only being halted in its present state, and says its principles are not being shelved. They are just tweeking the bill. They intend to carry on with this in some form.

Kenneth Vivian
Kenneth Vivian
1 year ago
Reply to  Gareth

Such is the art of Westminster polt

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.