Support our Nation today - please donate here
Opinion

A marriage of convenience?

02 Feb 2025 6 minute read
The Senedd. Photo Nation.Cymru

Gwern Gwynfil

A political revolution is coming to Wales in May 2026. A new, larger Senedd with 96 members will add capacity, reflective of the responsibilities already devolved and in preparation for further devolution.

The structure of this new electoral system creates a near certainty of coalition, co-operation and multi party rule as a basis for any level of competent and effective government and governance.

The tired first past the post system, shown by the General Election in 2024 to be so obviously and demonstrably unfit for purpose, henceforth completely expunged from Senedd elections in Wales.

Complexities and Curiousities

This change to a much purer proportional voting system (one vote each and, broadly speaking, every vote counts) puts paid to ‘tactical’ voting. Why vote tactically when you can vote according to your conscience for the party you really want to see in power?

With six seats in each constituency ‘pot’ even the very smallest of parties have a realistic opportunity to secure one of the available Senedd seats.

There are still some quirks to the new Welsh system. We will still be using the calculations of the D’Hondt system to allocate seats within constituencies. For those who want to understand the basics here is an explainer.

With six seat constituencies, larger parties should be favoured by the system – there is an absolute threshold at around 14% of the vote which essentially guarantees a seat. In practice it is possible to secure a seat with less if vote shares fall the right way for a smaller party. Realistically, around 12% of the votes, in any given constituency, will almost certainly deliver the sixth of the six available seats.

To be absolutely clear, any party that gets a blanket distribution of votes across Wales at 12-15% of the vote will secure 12-16 seats for themselves in the Senedd.

This is only 3 in every 20 votes cast.

For those who like numbers rather than percentages: 1,293,041 people cast a vote for a political party in Wales in the General Election last year, a party securing 193,956 of those votes, reasonably evenly distributed across Wales, would have 16 seats in the Senedd. Roughly speaking, this is 12,000 votes per Senedd constituency if turnout in May 2026 matches last year’s election. On a lower turnout, one more consistent with historic levels for Senedd elections, 10,000 votes per constituency could deliver 16 members of the Senedd.

Consequences

Whilst it’s probably wise to let the implications of the numbers above sink in for those of you still reading, at risk of blowing your minds further I shall plough on!

Polling data for Wales consistently puts the combined vote share for the Welsh Liberal Democrats and Welsh Greens within a whisker of the magic 12-15% range that secures 12-16 seats. This result would almost certainly leave a Liberal Green Alliance in Wales holding the balance of power in a very divided Senedd. Not only would an alliance give them a realistic prospect of 8 Members of the Senedd each but also of being powerbrokers with the possibility of three or four seats in the new expanded Cabinet.

By working together both parties could ascend from being also-rans to being parties of government. Whilst this may seem wild and outlandish to some of you it is a story very clearly told in the data we hold.

This is an upside available only to a Liberal Green Alliance.

Gains for Reform and Welsh Conservatives in collaboration are marginal (and potentially they could lose out); gains for a Plaid Cymru/Green alliance would also be marginal; it is a similar story for any other combination because our system creates a ‘magic threshold’ of success which the other parties have already surpassed but from which the Welsh Greens and Welsh Liberals are impossibly distant when flying solo.

Maximum Benefits

There are plenty of other upsides to a Green/Liberal Alliance in Wales. More media coverage, becoming the news story for once rather than impossibly flailing for attention in an environment dominated by Nigel ‘Arthur Daley’ Farage and his becoated posturing. More activists on the ground in each constituency, working hand in hand to canvass, to change the narrative of these elections and to get out the vote. Two party leaders working jointly to cover more media opportunities.

Can they do it? Yes they can.

They have to get started though. Forging an agreement by the end of this Spring and orchestrating a rolling electoral campaign across the media and on the ground for a full year in the run up to the elections in May 2026.

Will they do it? Unlikely.

The pragmatic and purposeful pursuit of power will not sit comfortably with large parts of either party. Purists and ideologues in both will shudder at the thought of working together with their political ‘enemies’, notwithstanding the reality that they have incredibly similar manifestos and the vast majority of their activists in Wales would broadly agree on the vast majority of policy issues.

Collaboration and Coalition Set in Stone

The irony here is that every party must be prepared to govern hand in glove with others in the Welsh political system. Whilst it is theoretically possible for one party to gain an absolute majority in the Senedd the bar is implausibly high in the real world. This is not first past the post politics but messy bargaining and compromise politics. Why not get ahead of the game and work together now when the prize delivers power and a multitude more members of the Senedd?

Other countries with similar systems have long since adopted such alliance politics, especially amongst smaller parties – Spain, Italy and Portugal, all with similar electoral mathematics to those we’ll see in Wales next year, demonstrate the efficacy and importance of small party alliances. These are not new, in Spain Unidas Podemos first appeared in 2016, in Italy the Olive Tree was a dynamic and evolving electoral coalition of multiple parties over two decades, in Portugal Bloco de Esquerda has been around for a quarter of a century and Coligação Democrática Unitária have been in electoral coalition since 1987!

Make Change Happen? Only if you’re Brave and Bold enough

Stand firm 

If you’re a Welsh Green, if you’re a Welsh Liberal, if you truly want to have an impact in Welsh politics, if you want to stand firm against the rise of Reform UK in Wales, you will seize the opportunity and do whatever it takes to make this happen. Work together, compromise, stand shoulder to shoulder on the doorstep and then bask in the feeling of actual success come May 2026.

Most people go into politics and campaigning to change things. This is a golden opportunity for Welsh Liberals and Welsh Greens to change Welsh politics dramatically.

Shoulder to shoulder, the Green and Liberal response to the challenge of 2026 can be historic and monumental, in isolation it will be no more than the whimper of a footnote in history.

We shall see!


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

17 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve. Thomas
Steve. Thomas
2 days ago

I thought a Plaid/Green coalition more likely. Similar policies bot want Indy

sion
sion
2 days ago

Very good article! I always supported a Green and Plaid coalition. If we look at Bildu party in the Basque country, left wing nationalists, greens and socialists combined forces to create a new party and have been very successful in recent elections there. I do think a Plaid/Green coalition could cement Plaid as a second place party ahead of the Tories and Reform (but so many people in Plaid can’t swallow their pride and reject the idea). Liberal and Green Alliance could really be effective and exciting and certainly be king makers against a rampant anti devo right wing Tories… Read more »

Tom
Tom
2 days ago
Reply to  sion

It’s a nice idea, it seemed successful in local elections in south wales at least, but how many greens could stomach the Plaid policies on the environment in the last General Election?

Llyn
Llyn
2 days ago

Rightly a combined Green/Liberal vote would provide many seats, looking at current polling. However, in the likely situation where the Greens and Liberals are on separate tickets, for the vast majority of constituencies voting Green and Liberal will split the left of centre vote and hand more seats to Reform UK.

Chris Hale
Chris Hale
2 days ago

Very poor article, completely ignoring the elephant in the room. The problem with the multi member constituencies is that the choice of who represents us as AM rests with the political parties nationally. There is no space for local choice of candidates and no need for AM’s to provide a good service to their constituents. Position on the list – and therefore likelihood of success – is in the gift of party bosses. The Labour Party in particular showed at the last general election that they have no hesitation in parachuting in political insiders with no knowledge of, or connection… Read more »

Gwern Gwynfil
Gwern Gwynfil
2 days ago
Reply to  Chris Hale

Hi Chris, I think you may have missed the thrust of the article here. Whilst you are right that the closed list system has serious flaws from a democracy perspective, the new system creates a space for small parties working together to capture the sixth seat in every constituency by passing the ‘magic threshold’ of 12% of the vote. If I wanted to highlight the democratic deficit in the system I would have written a totally different article! My point here is that the Welsh Liberals and the Welsh Greens could really capitalise on the system – 8 lists each… Read more »

Donald
Donald
2 days ago

With London Labour doing everything they can to undermine Welsh Labour, anything is possible.

John
John
2 days ago

Where I use to live in North Wales, the decision to increase the number of MSs has by far attracted more attention than the voting system changes. And it is deeply unpopular, especially with Reform/Tory voters. In my view, it has even triggered anti-Senedd feelings and at a time when there is a cost-of-living crisis and politicians aren’t particular popular. I wouldn’t be too surprised if a Reform policy at the Senedd election is a reduction in MSs! I hope not to offend; the elected politician with the highest approval ratings in the UK is currently Andy Burnham who runs a… Read more »

Mab Meirion
Mab Meirion
1 day ago
Reply to  John

It is a matter of national shame that ineptitude and off-stage misdirection constantly hamstrings Cymru…

Llyn
Llyn
1 day ago
Reply to  John

Yep for me the Senedd needs more members, but at the same time it might turn out to be a politically very unwise decision.

S Duggan
S Duggan
1 day ago

That’s what makes a proportional system fairer, though harder. Less people are disenfranchised and political parties have to work together. Often trading policies and mixing up our future prospects. Which is a good thing. Gone will be the stale, mundane Labour policies of the last two decades and a half. The object now is for political parties to realise this is very likely to happen and to to start building bridges with like minded parties now. Plaid, the Greens and the LibDems all need to communicate more so that they will be talking from the same page if required next… Read more »

Mawkernewek
Mawkernewek
1 day ago
Reply to  S Duggan

With the proposed system any party that can reliably command 1/6th of the vote get get a number of AS in who are very difficult to get voted out which I think would breed complacency in party leaderships. However practically it isn’t that much different than ‘safe’ seats under first past the post.

John Ellis
John Ellis
1 day ago

Mr Gwerfil persuasively points to the positive aspects of the new system, and I wholly accept the arguments which he offers in his advocacy of them. But he seems to me in his opinion piece to evade addressing what I see as potential downsides inherent to the method that we’ll perforce have to accept when we vote as the next Senedd election comes around. The first is that in the UK we’ve for centuries had a system under which people vote for a single named individual. Voters tend to be conservative around the choice offered to them at election time,… Read more »

HarrisR
HarrisR
1 day ago

Perhaps be careful what you wish for? The Greens in Bristol (their big electoral success) are fast becoming anything but as slogans confront reality and liability policies are implemented. “It’s the bins, it’s the roads…it’s vote loosing”. Heading the way of Brighton’s Greens where “unfortunately we took our eye of the ball” sic. And then there’s the Scottish Greens a freak show of its very own. And the Libdems, the poor cheerfully traded for paper bags, the joy of the bedroom tax still viciously with us. Wales’s own Lord Mike German leading it through the Lord’s as he contemplated his… Read more »

Will Evans
Will Evans
21 hours ago

Not good for Plaibour

Y Cymro
Y Cymro
18 hours ago

With 25 years of Welsh Labour Senedd rule, where the first 12 years were wasted thanks to New Labour at Westminster putting a spanner in the works with a powerless toothless Welsh Assembly patronised by an LCO (Legislative Competent Order) system, add insufficient members, took Plaid Cymru in coalition in 2007 to force Rhodri Morgan in turn PM Gordon Brown in Labour’s death throws in government to pass legislation that got royal accent that enabled a winning legislative referendum in 2011, which was won by a majority blowing out of the water all those hostile accusations that their was no… Read more »

John Davies
John Davies
3 minutes ago

I do not understand how the Greens who support annibyniaeth and the Liberals who do not can present a coherant policy to the Welsh electorate on this fundamental issue.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.