Don’t be an ar*ehole – a guide to Life
Gwern Gwynfil
Prejudice and social conflict rear their ugly heads constantly. Some may argue that this is part of the human condition, a tribalism deeply ingrained by evolution.
Factions, gangs, ‘in’ crowds, cliques, clans, clubs, ‘people’, race, teams, squads, crew, pack, the list goes on – and let’s not forget mob, herd and horde…
Countering this is the reality that we are one tribe today, globally connected by near instant communication and with easy and growing access to a vast repositories of information.
We also face a shared existential crisis as our climate changes rapidly, primarily as a result of our own actions. The impacts of these changes are indiscriminate, paying no mind to our structures but doing their own thing. When sea levels rise they do so according to the sea’s own rules, when extreme weather strikes it does so with no deference to the social structures and groupings of humans.
Words have Power
Sadly, many of us still feel the need to ‘other’ individuals based on race, sex, gender, language, skin colour and a whole host of other needless and pointless prejudices. Often stoked by lead actors who almost always seem motivated by little more than self aggrandisement.
Many of us fall for this regularly. The prejudice is all too often dressed up in clever language or pseudo argument that sounds convincing enough – words are powerful things, something of which any experienced, competent lawyer, journalist or politician will be well aware.
For those who doubt our susceptibility to the power of words to influence remember that a Gallup poll at the time found that 74% agreed with Powell’s infamous ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech in 1968.
Like the misinformation and disinformation spread in the wake of the horrific events in Southport, Powell’s words also led directly to an increase in racial violence.
New Platforms, Old Tropes
Users of the platform formerly known as Twitter will have noticed an acceleration in its slow decline of late. The quality of discourse has declined precipitously with free rein given to the promulgation of lies, nastiness and the very deliberate stoking of conflict – more than a forum for the poorly named ‘culture wars’, the platform is a cesspit of trolls and echo chambers, reinforcing erroneous beliefs, amplifying toxic lies and opinions.
As more and more of those who are sickened by this ‘public square’ discourse leave for other platforms (Threads is certainly becoming more vibrant) the concentration of toxicity ramps up relentlessly. Even the porn bots are leaving!
Pushback
How do we, as individuals, as societies, as nations and as a global community, push back against the relentless prejudices we seem determined to spawn? The answer in essence is a simple one – don’t be an arsehole.
I can already hear the tutting of those thinking to themselves that it’s not that simple. If this is you, give it a little more thought. We should make it that simple because in essence it is that simple.
By becoming an anti-arsehole we can all play our part in reducing arseholery in our own lives and the lives of those around us.
In a joyous ripple effect small acts of anti-arseholery can spread, improving lives and bringing joy and contentment.
You can help. From simple things like being considerate to other road users when driving in your car; giving a wider berth for a cyclist; allowing the waiting car to pull out; slowing down in town; being relaxed when another driver makes a mistake, it happens – to the deeper and more meaningful, challenging toxic ideas and lies when you encounter them, online or in real life; telling your friends and family when they’re being arseholes that they don’t need such behaviour to define who they are; facing up to arseholery wherever you come across it, in yourself and in others.
Everyone has One
We can all be arseholes sometimes but no one needs to be one all the time. Not even if they have a name that rhymes with garage, tusk or frump. When we’re tired, hungry, grumpy or drunk we all behave in ways that are less than ideal but so long as we check ourselves, ask if we’re being an arsehole and address it when the answer is ‘yes, yes we are’, then we improve our own lives and those of others. It’s not hard to do, the change is relatively small for each of us – collectively it could change the world.
This is the crux, we are always at our best when we work together to achieve great things, small contributions accumulating to make great changes and surpass huge milestones, from basic infrastructure to space exploration.
We can do this for the more fundamental and underappreciated goal of collective improvement too – better lives for ourselves and all those with whom we share our planet.
As the Summer in Cymru draws to a close, make the effort, be the change and don’t be an arsehole.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Who wrote this – Mark Mansfield or Gwern Gwynfil?
Shwmae Gareth, I wrote it, that’s why it has my name on the byline.
Not sure why you’d suspect otherwise.
Hope you enjoyed it
Then why does it say beneath the title …. ‘by Mark Mansfield’? It’s confusing.
No idea! Reading it on my phone it only has my byline – probably an error on listing. Am sure the Nation team will resolve if they haven’t already!
Explains the confusion though : )
It’s something I’ve noticed before with other people’s articles. It’s not obvious who really is the author.
Probably a listing of which member of the Nation team posted the article rather than the author – a downside of journalism on a shoestring!
A courteous and satisfying exchange about authorship. No ar*eholes here then.
I too pause when I scan the thumbnail pieces on Nation’s homepage. I appreciate the need for brevity on this page, but a colon after the author’s name would avoid for example:
‘Emily Price Former deputy minister…’
Such ammendment would enable scanning and tabbing of perhaps one or two more homepage items for reading later.
Nice sentiment but where does culture and identity sit within a globalised world where we are all the same? This is a complex topic and issues such as migration and how we preserve small but unique cultures such as our own need to be discussed…obviously without the input from arseholes!