Support our Nation today - please donate here
Opinion

Public sector mergers – do they work?

12 Feb 2025 6 minute read
Natural Resources Wales

Mike HedgesMS for Swansea East

Since local government reorganisation in 1973 there have been a large number of mergers in the Welsh public sector. There have also been a number of suggestions that there should be a further reorganisation of local government following the 1995 local government changes.

Water

Prior to 1973 Water and sewerage was controlled by local authorities and river authorities plus some small private water companies. Welsh Water originated from the privatisation in 1989 of the water supply and waste water arms of the Welsh Water Authority, which came from  the Welsh National Water Development Authority  created by the 1973 restructuring of the water industry in England and Wales where control of water and sewerage was removed from the control of the local councils.

In 2001, Welsh Water became a not-for-profit organisation with no shareholders. This differentiates it from all the water companies operating in England which are run for the financial benefit of the private entities that own them, with capital regularly removed as dividend, as well as from the organisational status of water utilities in Scotland and the pre-privatisation water supply undertakings in England, which are or were directly accountable to the government

‘Misled’

In March 2024 industry regulator Ofwat ordered Welsh Water to pay £40m upon concluding that the firm had “misled customers and regulators on its performance on leakage and per capita consumption”.

The only large reservoirs built since the merger in1973 are Llyn Brenig in 1975, Llyn Trawsfynydd in 1991 and Marchlyn Mawr in 2007. This compares with nine created between 1945 and 1973.

Whilst those in favour of the creation of Welsh water will argue that we had nearly enough reservoirs and that environmental standards have increased.

What is without doubt is that the cost has increased from being a small part of the local government rates bill to be a substantial water and sewerage bill.

Fire Service

Since 1996, fire and rescue services in Wales have been provided by three Fire and rescue authorities. Each one is run by a committee from the local authorities in its area. Those constituent local authorities are in turn responsible for the membership and funding of the fire and rescue authority.

Fire and rescue authorities raise a levy on each of the councils in the area covered. These fire and rescue authorities replaced the fire services run by the eight county councils.

We have seen extremely critical reports about the culture at north and mid & west Wales Fire and Rescue Services which found gender-based discrimination, as well as bias and favouritism, to be prevailing issues.

Severe criticism was levelled at the mid and west wales service, due to gender-based discrimination and sexism. The service was labelled by one participant as “an operational boys club”, with another claiming women were considered to be “tea-makers” while “men made the decisions.”

This follows on from action on south Wales fire authority which was found to have a culture of sexual harassment and misogyny and was taken over by the Welsh government.

We moved from Fire rescue services being directly run effectively by county councils pre reorganisation to what we have today. The mid and west wales fire authority stretches from Port Talbot to Knighton and Machynlleth. Fire and rescue services cover a large geographical area with limited scrutiny and political control.

Ambulance service

The Welsh Ambulance Service was established in 1998 by the amalgamation of four existing ambulance trusts, and the ambulance service provided by Pembrokeshire and Derwen NHS Trust.

Having the ambulance service run separately from hospitals does not work. Ambulances stacked outside hospitals and unable to attend 999 calls is the responsibility of the Welsh ambulance service not of the local health board.

Quoting from an Auditors General’s report from 2006 “The Trust has generally failed to meet its response time targets and to deliver consistent access to emergency ambulance services across Wales”. Things have not got better since 2006.

Health mergers

We have seven local health boards that now plan, secure, and deliver healthcare services in their areas, replacing the 22 LHBs and the 7 NHS trusts which together performed these functions previously. The population sizes vary between Powys at just over 130,000 to Betsi Cadwaladr at just under 700,000.

What we have seen is a reduction of the share of health expenditure on primary care and an increase in the percentage of health expenditure on hospital care despite approximately 90% of individual health contacts being with primary care providers.

In 2020, complaints against Betsi Cadwaladr accounted for 30% all grievances about health boards sent to the Public Service Ombudsman. It has got worse the  Public Service Ombudsman revealed  that Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board has been the most complained about in Wales over the last two years.

Since the start of 2024, more than half of the Ombudsman’s public interest reports, which are produced about the most serious complaints, have been about Betsi Cadwalladr.

Natural Resources Wales

Natural Resources Wales was formed from a merger of the Countryside Council for Wales, Environment Agency Wales, and the Forestry Commission Wales. As a justification for the merger, the Welsh Government claimed that the new body would produce savings of £158 million over ten years. For several years after the merger, it needed to use invest to save money to pay for things such as ICT and ICT based services being made compatible.

From the above it can be seen that the direction of travel is to larger and fewer organisations. Those who look at it simply, calculate the savings from reducing the number of senior staff and thus provide more money for front line services.

Mergers are expensive with redundancy costs and the cost of re badging the organisation. More expensive is creating a single ICT system from the systems of the predecessor organisations.

Economic theory predicts that an organization may become less efficient if it becomes too large. Larger organisations often suffer poor communication because they find it difficult to maintain an effective flow of information between departments, divisions or between head office and outlying parts.

Coordination problems also affect large organisations with many departments and divisions as they find it much harder to coordinate operations. ‘X’ inefficiency is the loss of management efficiency that occurs when organisations become large and operate in uncompetitive markets.

Such loses of efficiency include overpaying for resources including  paying managers salaries higher than needed to secure their services, and excessive waste of resources.

This leads to three questions on public services as they are currently configured. Do the larger organisations such as Betsi Cadwalladr perform better than smaller ones? Has the creation of all Wales organisations such as the Welsh ambulance service produced an improved service? Has the reduction in the number of organisations carrying out a function improved the services?


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brychan
Brychan
17 days ago

Mergers make sense if there is common purpose. A Welsh Ambulance goes to the nearest suitable hospital regardless of health board. However, with NRW it’s a conglomerate of competing interests. Nature v Forestry v Environment, of internal conflicts which would otherwise be resolved in the public or political arena. There’s been corruption and poor decisions. One thing is glaringly obvious is that policing is of common purpose so there should be a Wales wide force with devolved ministerial responsibility, like Scotland.

Evan Aled Bayton
Evan Aled Bayton
17 days ago

In England the housing associations have merged and become very large and covering multiple LA areas. The quality is generally poor and the management remuneration is consequently larger. I suspect they are charities but I have not looked into this in detail. I suspect that this is detrimental to the service and should be reversed. HAs should be in general coterminous with the LA. I know in Wales that some cover several LA areas but usually in parallel with others – multiple HAs in one authority. I suspect that use of public funds would not stand up to robust scrutiny… Read more »

Brychan
Brychan
17 days ago

Wales and West HA is a classic example that transcends the border. Problem is that mergers is driven by acquiring more asset value, for a HA more homes under it’s wing, in order to finance increasing debt. Eventually the house of cards will fall. The high paid execs will have pocketed the proceeds and be long gone.

Undecided
Undecided
17 days ago

A rather tired analysis and there is no such thing as the optimum size. Welsh Labour has a dismal track record of reorganising health boards badly, not having the political will to reorganise local government at all and coming up with the three headed monster that is NRW. The new government in ‘26 may come up with better – they can’t do any worse.

alan david kreppel
alan david kreppel
17 days ago

This is a very superficial analysis, with no basis or even evidence for the claims that smaller units historically ran more efficiently. What is touched upon, in the article, but not developed, is the chaos and disruption that is caused when interdependent services are managed and financed independently with no common objective or governance , such as health services. The classic example is the devolution of the Ambulance service from the Health Boards. The devastating results are clear at every major hospital. Similarly, the management by Local Authorities of social support and care for the aged, is governed by their… Read more »

Philip Owen
Philip Owen
16 days ago

Operationally, these organizations do not have economies of scale. Procurement fundctions can be outsourced/shared anyway. Merger is about combining headquarters functions to reduce headcount. As the article points out, there are communication and management costs for larger organizations and management also becomes remote and inaccessible from the communities served.

In 1947, County Councils had more powers than the modern WElsh Government. There is a case for them having power and responsbility stored.

Hal
Hal
13 days ago

Like everything there’s a balance to be struck between the benefits that come with economies of scale, versus the benefits that come from a local understanding of the challenges on the ground. In many cases a hybrid merger might be possible so common back office services such as HR computer systems and payrolling could be centralised without losing the local focus of those delivering the actual services. One benefit that is lost when a single organisation is running the show is the ability to compare performance and learn from best practice. With 22 councils delivering similar services, some will be… Read more »

mike hedges
mike hedges
12 days ago
Reply to  Hal

In France all teacher’s pay is provided centrally

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.