The UK Economy and the coming reckoning
Jonathan Edwards
Over recent weeks, whatever the subject under consideration, UK Ministers haven’t opened their mouths without using the phrase ‘growth is the number one priority of the government’.
Superficially this can be explained by incredible message discipline as part of the new year reset. If you were writing a book on how to manage your first 100 days in office, you only have to look at the actions of the new UK Government and do the exact opposite.
The honeymoon has long gone with the latest polls indicating that Reform UK, with only five MPs, is in second place, not far behind the governing party, having seen their poll rating increase by 10 percentage points in a matter of months.
The Tories, who are all over the shop, are only 4% behind. Together the Reform/Tory vote leads by 20%.
Domestic political management
I sense that matters are more serious than domestic political management. The whole machinery of government has been deployed to try and reassure international investors who finance UK debt that the UK Government has a handle on the economy.
The cost of UK state borrowing has increased significantly, raising the spectre that the British state is on the verge of a debt crisis. The borrowing base rate has increased to 4.64%, which is 1.66% higher than Portugal; nearly 1% higher than Italy; 1.2% higher than Greece; and 1.5% higher than Spain. I mention the so-called PIGS to give an indication of the deep trouble the UK is currently in.
To make matters worse, the value of the sterling currency has been in freefall since the beginning of the year. Some economic analysts are now asking whether the UK is on the precipice of a debt and currency crisis, where extra borrowing is required to service increasing debt interest costs and speculators short the pound.
I always voted against fiscal targets as I viewed them as a deliberate ploy by the Tories to dictate policy.
Labour on the other hand always supported them, I suspect in order not to give the Conservatives the chance to attack them for being reckless with public spending.
However, their acceptance by the new government leaves the Treasury in an unenviable position.
When international investors don’t believe that the chosen policy is deliverable, the targets soon become a slow garrotte.
More austerity
The Chancellor is now contemplating more austerity at the forthcoming Comprehensive Spending Review as a means of trying to achieve self-imposed targets.
Reducing public investment is an economic headwind which is why investors have reacted as they have.
This week the Chancellor’s Growth announcement was aimed more at the ‘markets’ as opposed to a domestic political audience.
The economic alarm bells are ringing. An economic crisis will inevitably lead to a political crisis, and while the majority Labour enjoys will stave off the collapse of the government, its long road to election defeat at the next general election will be set.
Labour won with less than 34% of the vote last year. It has very little margin to play with, especially if the Tories and Reform come to some sort of arrangement as mutual interest will surely encourage.
The UK economic model has been unsustainable for a very long time.
Kamikaze economics
Labour did inherit a mess, but it wasn’t one solely from the Truss-Kwarteng experiment in kamikaze economics.
The rot goes back further to Thatcher, embraced by Blair and Brown: to bet big on the financial sector.
Even amateurs who like a punt on shares know you have to diversify your portfolio; the UK state for decades has been placing all its eggs in one basket.
Much was the talk following the 2008 financial crash about the need to rebalance geographically and sectorally.
There was precious little governmental action apart from baseless slogans such as Levelling Up. What has happened is that geographical and individual wealth has become even more polarised.
Today in the UK, according to the Resolution Foundation, wealth is unequally distributed far more than income. If more consumption is funded from wealth, then living standards diverge driving inequality.
The report further notes that compared to the 1970s, the private wealth to national income ratio in the UK has doubled to 6:1.
Wealth
A clear indication of economic health comes when looking at wealth between the generations. In a vibrant economy each generation should be more affluent than the one that precedes it. The complete opposite is the case in the UK today, where we are witnessing generational slowdown.
These statistics project decline with a capital D.
The reckoning facing the UK economy might not come this month or the next, but it will eventually come. The key question policy makers will then face is what alternative economic model the UK can adopt and who will bear the cost of the transition.
At this stage the only credible path will be to tax private wealth, especially considering the vast quantities accumulated by the richest in recent decades.
However, is there a political party out there prepared to make the case?
Viewed from this context, the announcements by the Chancellor in her growth strategy this week at best can only offer a stay of execution for UK plc.
Jonathan Edwards was the MP for Carmarthen East and Dinefwr 2010 – 2024.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Perhaps it will fall to the IMF to audit the books and make a list of politically unthinkable demands needed to put things back on track. At least they will propose rejoining the single market in return for a bailout. The public could be asked to choose between this and other unpopular options such as pension cuts or healthcare charges.
Once again, I’d like to thank Jonathan Edwards for introducing me—via Nation.Cymru—to David McWilliams’ podcast. I binged on it over Christmas and passed it on to other JE followers, who were similarly impressed. The reality is this: Trump will accomplish more between now and 2026 than Welsh Labour has managed in 25 years of debating pronouns, climate change, and banning electric dog collars while ignoring real crises. Wales is facing a massive homelessness crisis and an even bigger cost-of-living crisis. Meanwhile, Eluned Morgan—born into privilege but pretending otherwise—enjoys a hefty EU pension and pockets £450 a day for signing in… Read more »
The Princess and Smiles the Hologram, and a couple of grey hairs enjoying semi-retirement at the country’s expense, the keys handed over to lobbyists and developers, a wide boy’s dream…carpet bags for old carpets cried a lad in Cardiff…we are in for a good dusting…
This was a well written and thoughtful contribution. What worries me is the final point in Dewi’s contribution. I’m not sure who the talented leader is…but in mentioning Neil McEvoy, whatever his failings. he was indeed a scrapper and prepared to call a spade a spade. He upset the self serving Plaid Cymru Senedd group so he must have done something right….. What really worries me is that, unfortunately, Plaid Cymru is the only show in town. There’s just over a year to go to what might turn out to be the most important Senedd election. Ap Iorwerth – where… Read more »
‘The talented leader’ is Rhun, I also think Adam Price is exceptional. Rhun takes me back to Dafydd Wigley days, you know when he appears on television everything is going to be alright.
Sadly, I disagree. Rhun may well be good on television but hell, he’s a tv journalist and there’d be problems if he didn’t come over well! But where’s the fight? At the end of a debate at the Senedd, the then First Minister Mark Drakeford looked at him and said (paraphrase) the he wasn’t necessarily against independence, but where was the £3billion to come from? The response from the leader of Plaid Cymru? A blank stare, rabbit caught in the headlines. I have nothing kind to say about Adam Price. Like many supporters and past, hard working members of Plaid… Read more »
I believe Plaid Cymru has been blessed with two remarkable politicians in Rhun ap Iorwerth and Adam Price, both of whom are exceptionally talented. Believe me, I share your enthusiasm for Dafydd Wigley—as a child, whenever he appeared on TV, I would clap loudly, knowing the other side was in for a battering. But look at the SNP—a much larger party—yet they have no one of Adam or Rhun’s ability. Sinn Féin does have Pearse Doherty, who is undoubtedly among the very best, but for some reason, he isn’t being pushed forward as the party’s leader. Personally, I’m very happy… Read more »
Thank you for your reply. I truly respect your views,especially I should say about Neil McEvoy and Jonathan Edwards. However, I fundamentally disagree with your support of Ap Iorwerth and Price. The former is weak, I’ve yet to see any spark, any fight – see my earlier response. He was responsible for the “Pathway to Independence” nonsense that sent many supporters away. The interest in independence was an anathema until Yes Cymru started to grow and shone a light on the party’s lack of commitment. I repeat my comments on Price. Over the years many good, hardworking members had to… Read more »
So basically, Starmer et al have been sniping from the opposition benches for the last four years, claiming to have all the answers. They set out their manifesto pledges, won a general election, and promptly u-turned on pretty much everything they’d promised. We now see that they never really had a clue how to run the country. They made such a fuss about having a female chancellor that they missed the fact that she can’t add up. It’s not going to get any better.
It’s not going to get any better, you’re right. Not until everyone accepts that Thatcher killed the wealth creating industries needed to be a global trading nation and replaced them with a financial services sector dependent on access to Europe. That’s why Brexit isn’t working. Reversing Thatcherism is going to take decades and in the meantime the exploding population of olds is sucking the kitty dry.
Thatcher was a long time ago, and we had Blair in the interim: that didn’t end well did it? The Tories were ghastly but Labour’s track record on the economy is dire. This lot are particularly clueless as the state of the country demonstrates. We’ll be facing blackouts, the collapse of our economy, and an IMF bale out within the next 24 months. Then you’ll have PM Nigel Farage, so strap yourself in.
That doesn’t change the root cause. It also ignores that Labour in the 70s was a victim of the global economic situation. No government could survive a quadrupling of oil prices. And the Cons in the 80s enjoyed the global recovery of the oil price. It was nothing to do with Thatcherism but that didn’t stop her coincidental decisions being turned into a cult by the economically clueless. There’s no other explanation for Truss’s obviously nonsense economic plan to be backed by most Conservatives.
Reeves has just out-done Truss in the fiscal-illiteracy stakes by a mile. Labour has never left government with the economy in a better state than when it took office. Keep comforting yourself with excuses by all means, but the state we are in, and the demise we are facing, is the fault of no one but this government.
There is no answer to the problem of a country that if it was gifted with an asset such as North Sea Oil was. The UK will plunder it and not plan its next step of investing the proceeds. The UK just doesn’t have any will to survive as a nation other than to reward its oligarchs. The entire regime (including Reform UK) is corrupt to its core, with too much centralisation of power and wealth. With few productive assets owned by its people. What can Wales, Scotland and Ireland do ? Get ourselves out of the UK regime: The… Read more »
You cannot be serious. Making sure there is enough money to pay the bills is called fiscal prudence. A magic beans growth plan to borrow eye-watering amounts of money to give the wealthiest just to stash in offshore bank accounts and add nothing to GDP is reckless and irresponsible nonsense.
I strongly suspect that the North Sea oil revenue and FS sector masked the problems you mentioned during the 90s and early 2000s.
Also the house price inflation that was making a generation feel richer every year. Of course this isn’t real wealth creation, it’s theft from future generations.
As did the selling off of public assets. Almost 500 assets have been sold, or privatised. Some only raised a few tens of millions, but gas and telecoms raised £4.5bn each; there were others that weren’t far behind.
You are very right, nationalization – at the time it did happen – reduced state capacity in R&D across the UK and probably had a big impact on productivity. BT labs spring to mind. Short termism
In fairness, I don’t think he ever said he had all the answers. Far from it, the moment they brought any realism into the debate, polls went down. Boosterism is preferred by uk public
The answers he did claim to have – he lied about. Fully costed and fully funded – remember?
“However, is there a political party out there prepared to make the case?” Not Labour. They’ve boxed themselves into this mess and haven’t the courage to do anything radical – like enter some agreement with the EU on trade. They now have nothing left other than to do things which runs counter to their Green promises. How can you claim to be Green and yet back a 3rd runway at Heathrow that will generate an extra 100,000 flights per year. How can you abolish planning regulations without believing they will not harm the environment? We are entirely on the wrong… Read more »
Religious zealots are able to hold opposing positions because they don’t operate on the basis of reality. Net Zero is a quasi-religious cult.
No, Net Zero is based on reality; denialusm is a quasi-religious cult.
They could stop Heathrow being a hub airport by highly taxing people who don’t start or end their journey in the UK. They add nothing but carbon footprints to the UK economy and are taking up the slots that could be used for the flights and destinations we apparently need for growth. And it could happen now.
Seeing as this article is still live on the front page, I wonder if the author could comment on the latest UK 10 year gilt yields, which yesterday returned to levels seen pre budget. Whilst other countries remain similarly high