Support our Nation today - please donate here
Opinion

What a fair deal for ex-steelworkers would look like as the industry decarbonises

27 Jan 2024 5 minute read
The UK’s largest steel works in Port Talbot. Photo Ben Birchall PA Images

Chris McLachlan, Senior Lecturer in Human Resource Management, Queen Mary University of London

Plans to cut almost 3,000 jobs at the UK’s largest steelworks, Tata Steel in Port Talbot, mark another devastating chapter in a long history of deindustrialisation.

The closure of steel plants in Ravenscraig, Ebbw Vale and Redcar will be haunting the steelworkers in Port Talbot, serving as a reminder of what is at stake. Although this so-called “restructuring” has sadly become the norm, former workers at other large steelworks are still scarred by loss of income, identity and skills in the post-redundancy transition.

Tata has expressed regret at the hand it has dealt workers. There are modest signs it will work with trade unions and governments on what have been described as “transition boards”. This is to be backed by a £130 million support package that could arguably ensure the restructuring is conducted responsibly. Also, the intimacy between the steelworks and the local community mean Tata is compelled to provide support.

The steelworks is Port Talbot’s largest private sector employer. Workers, families, residents and local businesses depend on the steelworks to sustain their livelihoods and the fortunes of the town.

What’s more, according to ONS data Port Talbot is one of the most deprived places in the UK, and a focus of the government’s “levelling up” agenda. Any job losses will reverberate throughout the region and their impact will be reinforced by wider inequalities across south Wales.

The move by Tata is because of environmental pressures to decarbonise steel production, primarily from coal-powered blast furnaces like those in Port Talbot. Instead, Tata will invest in an electric arc furnace that recycles scrap steel through an electrification process before being cast into steel products.

Despite its emissions, steel is considered one of six “foundation industries” as it remains essential for “green” products such as wind turbines, electric vehicles and low carbon homes.

Jobs v environment

Port Talbot therefore signifies another fateful episode in the tension between saving jobs versus saving the environment. This heightened vulnerability of the steel industry to environmental pressures brings the notion of a “just transition” into sharp relief.

With its origins in the international trade union movement, a just transition focuses on ensuring that workers and communities most affected by the shift to a greener economy do not end up worse off. This can be achieved through dialogue between governments, companies, workers and community groups, and social interventions aimed at protecting jobs for the future.

Photo Ben Birchall/PA Wire

Planning for such transitions is not new to the industry. At Tata Steel Europe in the Netherlands, unions and management recently concluded an agreement known as the “Green Steel Social Contract”. The agreement maps out a just transition pathway that involves measures such as employment guarantees, monetary incentives related to retention and individual tailor-made employability plans.

Similarly, Swedish steelmaker SSAB has been working with trade union IF Metall for a number of years over the switch to greener steel production while securing jobs in the process. Although there are different national contexts, they demonstrate what at least might be possible.

What next for steelworkers

Part of the negotiations between stakeholders in a just transition process is identifying the types of education, training and qualifications that steelworkers might need to retrain. For example, although production through electric arc furnaces is less labour-intensive, more jobs may emerge in the manufacture of end products for which steelworkers would be well suited.

Scrap steel can create blooms, billets and rods for use in construction and the production of industrial equipment. Other possibilities lie in learning new digital skills to help with robot-assisted production in the steel sector.

A huge caveat to retraining prospects for steelworkers is the extent of funding along with whether a meaningful industrial strategy reflects the regional labour market. Government intervention here is necessary to make sure the new skills match the available jobs. Further still, retraining raises questions over whether new jobs are of a similar quality, income and status, or if workers can relocate to new areas for work.

Community union found that following the closure of a large steel plant in Redcar, north-east England, those earning £30,000 a year dropped from 80% pre-closure to 35% post-closure, and 18% took two years to find a job post-redundancy. These constraints cannot be taken for granted, as they further compound the consequences of job losses for steelworkers.

A just transition should champion the needs of workers and communities while also recognising the needs of regional economies. This is where the steel unions come into play as they are strongly embedded in the workforce and local community. And perhaps regrettably, episodic restructuring has meant unions are well versed in mitigating its effects.

An alternative transition plan proposed by unions was already rejected by Tata. Whatever its reasons, Tata cannot deny the expertise and insights the unions have of the lives of workers and the south Wales region. If Tata seeks a transition that is just and socially acceptable to workers and communities, then it has no choice but to heed the legitimacy of the unions. For steelworkers in Port Talbot, “hope dies last”.

This article was first published on The Conversation
The Conversation


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ann
Ann
26 days ago

This article does not reflect the fact that Tata Steel is currently proposing a new blast furnace in India! See my comment on a previous article.

Linda Jones
Linda Jones
26 days ago
Reply to  Ann

The blast furnace in India is opening soon. This change is clearly about shutting down new steelmaking in the UK in favour of India and our government are lying through their teeth about it. Green credentials my foot.

Annibendod
Annibendod
26 days ago

The closure of the blast furnaces is being painted as a tension between “the green agenda” and “jobs”. That I fear is a dead cat/culture war red meat. The more prosaic fact is that industry in the UK was thrown to the wolves during the 80’s privatisations and in true Minfordesque spirit, left to fail as the investment needed to modernise and remain competetive fell away. Compare with the likes of Germany who chose a different route. This is purely a political choice. The UK crach make their money in The City. That’s the cash cow. That’s why they poured… Read more »

Last edited 26 days ago by Annibendod
Emma Catherwood
Emma Catherwood
24 days ago
Reply to  Annibendod

I think you should check out how German citizens are starting to react to the decarbonusation of their heavy industries. Its one of the reasons for the surge in the popularity of the AFD.

Linda Jones
Linda Jones
25 days ago

The closure of Port Talbot blast furnaces has nothing to do with a ‘greener’ future and everything to do with Tata Steel moving the production of new steel making to their brand new and massive blast furnace in India.
We are being lied to as government and Tata steel hide behind the notion of a ‘green’ agenda. Clearly it isnt

Emma Catherwood
Emma Catherwood
24 days ago
Reply to  Linda Jones

Absolutely correct.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.