Why Jane Dodds shouldn’t resign as leader of the Welsh Liberals
Gwern Gwynfil
Following some stirring of the pot by a small number of Welsh members of her party who suffer from a visceral hatred of Jane Dodds, the federal party leader, Ed Davey, has suggested that the Welsh leader should ‘consider her position’.
This is political code for calling for a resignation.
But it is not for Ed Davey to dictate to the leader of the Welsh Liberal Democrats. It is not for the Federal party to throw its weight around as the much larger presence within that structure. This is not a liberal thing to do.
It is also surprisingly naive and a little foolish of him to be sucked in by a little negative briefing from within the party in Wales.
Hats off to Nation once again for its outsize influence because of the quality (and existence!) of its reporting and scrutiny.
Disgruntled members
No party should allow a small handful of disgruntled members to use an old story, seize upon it and spin it (with some skill) in light of the resignation of Archbishop Welby.
We should commend them for actually demonstrating that the Welsh Liberal Democrats have some grasp of elementary communications but the Welsh party leader should treat their attempt with the contempt it deserves – reiterating her original apology (as she has) and moving on to matters of substance.
Mr Davey should apologise for his own interference and assure Jane Dodds that Welsh party matters are for the Welsh party leader and Welsh membership to address without interference.
This is not a resigning matter. It is certainly not wise to call on the only Senedd member the Liberal Democrats have to step down 18 months before a Senedd election. An election in which polling suggests the Welsh LibDems will do very poorly – the median prediction is the retention of their single MS.
Additionally, the new MP, David Chadwick, is woefully ill equipped to lead the party in Wales. I was at the Welsh Liberal Democrat conference in Llandrindod this weekend and he clearly does not grasp the Welsh mindset, does not understand devolution and is guilty of the classic sneering and patronising mentality that Welsh MPs so often have towards their ‘lesser’ Senedd siblings.
New Leadership?
The Welsh Liberal Democrats must have a leader embedded in Wales if they wish to have any traction whatsoever in the 2026 Senedd elections. It is imperative that the party’s leadership resides in the Senedd and not outside Wales in a distant legislature.
Too many Liberals in Wales are tired of a feudal arrangement of external instruction. It does not fit with the party’s own federalist beliefs to impose outside leadership on a party that should be here to be in, and of, Wales.
The Welsh Liberal Democrats have no choice but to hold on to Jane Dodds as she is their only option.
This is far from ideal and if members are disgruntled and wish to oust their leader their best course of action would be to throw themselves into a transformative plan to revitalise, renew and refresh their party so that it can return more members to the Senedd in 2026. That will be the time for leadership change.
Replacing an experienced Welsh leader, who has some grasp and understanding of Wales and Welsh politics, with an inexperienced and underwhelming new entrant to a legislature in a different country would simply hasten the slow unravelling of the WLDs as a political force in Wales.
Zombie Party?
Ironically, on the first day of the conference there was a wake being held in the same venue. An uncharitable observer of the conference would wonder whether delegates would be able to tell the difference between the two events. We might wonder whether anyone found themselves in the wrong room, with some considerable delay before realising their mistake.
Jane Dodds
Unexpectedly, the highlight of the conference was the keynote address by Jane Dodds as leader. She outperformed her Parliamentary colleague handily. Delivering a speech which felt authentic, Welsh and optimistic. She accurately recognised that there was an opportunity for Liberalism in Wales in 2026, she acknowledged some of the challenges faced by the party, she spoke with an authenticity and passion often missing from her public appearances.
The void in her speech was the absence of a plan to seize that opportunity. This is unsurprising when she is under attack from a small number of disgruntled oddbods in her own party and where the English Federal party is yet to be persuaded to back the Welsh party. However, the Welsh Liberals need a plan, it needs to be radical and they need it yesterday if they wish to make an impact in 2026.
Bold Leadership
Jane should now push back with vigour. She should demand support from the federal party for radical change in Wales and a very clear and distinct path for Welsh Liberalism which will work for Wales, one which can complement but not ape the liberalism being developed in England to appeal to a very different electorate.
The UK liberals should lean hard into their federal structure to optimise its success and functionality. If they are serious about power in Wales, about power in Westminster, then this is the only route to the kind of success that is needed.
Wales in Westminster
Meanwhile, the sole Welsh Liberal MP, David Chadwick, needs to develop his understanding of devolution, his understanding of Wales and Welsh politics and his understanding of his own role as a Welsh representative in the London Parliament.
He would do well to sit down and listen to some of his Welsh peers in the Parliament for a long and elucidating discussion. I recommend tapping Ben Lake, that eminently Welsh liberal Plaid Cymru MP from Ceredigion and North Pembrokeshire.
I am sure that David could learn an awful lot if he listens and learns with an open and enquiring mind – it will help him enormously in learning how to strike the right note when he next addresses his own party and constituency here in Wales.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
How Gwern Gwynfil can write a whole article on why Jane Dodds should not resign without once mentioning the reason why there are calls for her resignation! The calls for her resignation was because she failed to respond in a professional way to a senior cleric in the Anglican Church abusing a boy whilst she was a safeguarding officer. What if a local authority social worker was to do the same, would they be disciplined or sacked, probably so. Whenever I see these things happening and it is sadly occurring far too often, I wonder if these so called professionals… Read more »
Henffych Arfon, that has been well covered elsewhere and this story is already a rerun of a story already known. JD certainly failed in her duties (a fact she has acknowledged and for which she has apologised unreservedly – an unusual mea culpa from a modern politician) but there should be no equating her error with the egregious failures of the CoE and of Archbishop Welsby personally. They are not comparable at all. However, I am with you that our politicians generally should be held to a higher standard, but if we’re doing that there are a lot of Welsh… Read more »
Sadly Gwern Gwynfils article demonstrates how far we still have to go to endure our children are safe from abuse. Gwern conveniently ignores the fact that Jane Dodds was a senior safeguarding officer in The CofE whose role was to investigate allegations of abuse and protect children, she clearly failed to do that at the most basic level. The attitude displayed by Gwern Gwynfil in his unacceptable defence of a political colleague is exactly the same attitude that allowed the likes of Jimmy Saville to get away with countless cases of sexual abuse. if we can’t protect and look after… Read more »
At no point in the article do I defend JD’s actions in her safeguarding role and she is in no way a ‘political colleague’
Please read things more carefully Idris
I’m sorry Gwern your entire article is a defence of Janet Dodds and her right to remain leader of the liberal democrat party in Wales because you see it as politically expedient to do so. In your response to Arfon Jones you refer to Andrew Davies and infer that if ARTY is still in position as a political leader Jane Dodds should similarly retain her position. I’m afraid that won’t wash “The ah yes but what about …argument ?” is no argument at all. In the past you have often commented on your Welsh liberal political background, I wonder if this this article would’ve… Read more »
Idris, as I understand it, the person referred to in the case involving JD, ‘M2’, was in his early 30’s at the time of the incident being discussed – it was very inappropriate behaviour by a Bishop and a meeting should have been arranged but you seem to be confusing it with those parts of the report which were addressed to the actions of the serial child abuser Smyth and others (who Welsby actively protected and which is why he had to resign). You’re bringing in very serious issues around child protection and child abuse but they have no relevance… Read more »
The upcoming Senedd elections and the availability of suitable replacement have no bearing whatsoever on whether Dodds should resign.
Sorry Paddy, but in today’s political world, I’m afraid they do. Particularly so for this small rump of a party – which is facing oblivion if it doesn’t transform itself. Something I’ll write about soon. We may well wish for a world where things were different but that would be a political world where there were no RT Davies’, no Andersons or Farages, no Trumps, no LePens, no Johnsons – a world which will never exist, however tightly we close our eyes and yearn for such a place. However, we can and should expect more of our politicans, we can… Read more »
I still maintain that the issue is whether the “grave error of judgement” in a matter of child protection precludes Dodd’s from public service service, or a position of a leadership. If that is the case, other considerations are secondary.
I’d have to read the report to reach a judgement on that.
The key sentence is: “The Welsh Liberal Democrats have no choice but to hold on to Jane Dodds as she is their only option.”
As ringing endorsements go, that’s a clanger. If, as rumoured, Jane Dodds has gone native with Labour in the Senedd, her presence as the leader will do even more damage than Kirsty Williams did in the dog days of the last Senedd when she handed the Brecon seat to the Conservatives on a plate.
I am as surprised as anyone to find myself defending JD so vigorously Jon!
But this is political reality for a party with a single Senedd member in Wales.
She is the only person they have who can lead them into the 2026 elections (if they transform their approach there may be more Welsh liberals in that Senedd – that would be the time for a change of leadership)
So the only Lib Dem kept afloat by the least ‘liberal’ family in Cymru…ask a quarry union man for their opinion…
A three way Venn Diagram of Ms Dodds, Chuka Umunna and the 7th Baron Penrhyn what are the odds ?