A federal Europe of nations III: Our future is national and federal

Mathieu Guihard President of the Breton Party / Strollad Breizh
Europe’s ethnic diversity is an immense strength. Our continent is home to some one hundred peoples, and is the cradle of several major civilisations: Celtic, Greco-Latin, Germanic and Slavic.
This diversity must be preserved and nurtured, for it is a source of creativity and a stimulus to human progress, for example in the artistic and scientific fields.
The whole of European history proves that small groups have been the most fruitful, not large, levelling, centralised empires.
It’s worth noting that miscegenation, if defended as a systemic societal project as it is by French European “federalists” and left-wing sovereigntists (LFI, PCF), and even sometimes right-wing sovereigntists, would be the opposite of this diversity and would lead to the annihilation of European peoples.
The counterpart of the totalitarian nation-state-Europe described in part 2, in short. Yann Fouéré warns us that miscegenation “accelerates the atomisation of man and his uprooting” (in “Europe the 100 flags” p.176).
Let’s be clear: this in no way means that people of mixed race should be vilified – that would be disgraceful. What we’re talking about here is a political project for the global and widespread “métissage” of European societies.
Yes, Europe is unique, remarkable and precious. Its geography is rich, its history fascinating. But it is no longer truly powerful.
The world is moving fast, and Europeans are not, either inside or outside the European Union. The European Union, in particular, is hybrid and unfinished, blocked by the stranglehold of its member nation-states.
Nations are essential in Europe
The expression “federal Europe of nations” is a given.
But why speak of “nations” when we’re talking about a federal Europe? Because the nation is the human framework for the development of a people and the application of a political project at its service.
It is the result of centuries of human history, and is an ethnic and cultural reality essential to the equilibrium of the men and women who make it up.
It’s in our nature as human beings to need a sense of belonging and identity. So, federalist AND nationalist.
In fact, some of the great names of the 20th century were both, from Gandhi to Vaclav Havel, and the same is true of contemporary pan-Africanists.
Conversely, the so-called “Europe of the nations” of French sovereigntists is in reality the Europe of the nation-states of the 19th century, artificial and self-destructive by nature.
Yann Fouéré describes nation-states as “an accident of history” doomed to disappear (p.109). This kind of Europe would lead us straight into World War 3, which Vladimir Putin is currently brandishing as a threat to Europe in his speeches. QED.
Federal Europe is the future
In many countries or “continent-countries” where federalism is already in force, diplomacy and defence are two areas systematically devolved to the federal level.
In the Federal Europe of Nations, this will also be the case.
The other areas can be exercised at local, regional, national or European federal level, depending on the field in question and applying the tried and tested principle of subsidiarity.
Federal organisation will thus radically eliminate the disadvantages of political fragmentation.
A federal Europe of nations will prevent war between European nations, and protect against external aggression. It is the guarantee of lasting prosperity, and the most successful model of democracy and fundamental freedoms.
There will be around a hundred member nations of roughly equivalent size and power, preventing any imperialist temptations.
The Breton people (5 million strong, with a solid economy) are a good example of this standard European size and power.
These nations will have to accept the withdrawal of part of their sovereignty.
France will have to share, even if its old pride suffers…
Progressive federalisation
Over the course of this century, there will be no shortage of projects to drive forward a prosperous and powerful Federal Europe of Nations: European campuses of excellence, a federal police force, a blue ocean pact, the emergence of forward-looking industries… to name but a few.
This federal Europe of the peoples could be built progressively in several “cores” made up of peoples establishing simple partnerships at first, other peoples building an economic union with a single currency and without fiscal or social dumping as at present, and a central core of the most willing and ready nations truly integrated into a federal state.
Of course, there will be a president to represent Europe, alongside the heads of the European states, and a European federal parliament.
This will undoubtedly take place in several stages, the ultimate goal being the reunion of all 100 European nations in a Europe “united in diversity”, to quote the beautiful motto of the European Union.
Of course, the nations of Europe could themselves be organized internally on a federal basis. This is perfectly suited to our country, Brittany, and to our national state of mind.
Let us leave the final word to the poet Robert Mallet: “Good ideas have no age, they only have a future”. If we want it, the 21st century will be the century of the union of the peoples of Europe. War-raok Europa!
Read the first and second parts of this article.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Wales a European country not part of this U K joke Disunited Kingdom where all the countries of Europe are equal not everything about England
That”s not what your countrymen think. We voted to leave the EU by a margin of 6%, with a turnout of 71%: by contrast the devolution vote of 1997 was won by 0.6%, with a turnout of only 50%.
Time to get into the 2020s. You cannot argue about a referendum that took place 28 years ago and act like its public opinion for today, I know loads of many who voted No in 1997 and have come around to accept it and would not vote to get rid of it. A lot of people who voted No are no longer around… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_on_Welsh_independence#Devolution_extent_polls Regarding Brexit, polls suggest people are now in favour of re-joining (although not overwhelming). Again if you factor in that many elderly leave voters who are no longer alive, and with Trump abandoning Ukraine meaning that… Read more »
So campaign for another referendum Rob: it’s not me that keeps banging on about past referendums on here; it’s generally those people who didn’t seem to grasp that they might lose, and are still having tantrums about it.
Sounds good in practise, but would authoritarian ruler aka Poundland Putin Keir Starmer & New Labour think this was a “Coalition of the Willing” seeing his government won’t even give back the Senedd admin powers over our once EU Structural Funding that was taken hostage by Boris Johnson’s idiocracy let alone regard us as an equal among many in a European Federation of Nations. Only independence will bring certainty. Power in our hands (Cardiff) is better than in theirs (Whitehall).
Independent countries consisting of the indigenous cultures of Europe, ie, Cymru, Breton, Catalonia etc. working together in a federal Europe sounds great but getting past the current set up would be extremely hard – there’s too much invested in it. However, it is a good idea, countries of equal size and wealth would lead to a more peaceful, world, let alone Europe. Look at the current bullying of one country that’s got too much power and wealth. The UK was as controlling in the 19th century and Spain in the 16th. I’m pretty sure China will be in the very… Read more »
Getting past the current set up is not easy, but here’s a possible way. Take Wales. Hold a Constitutional Convention in which we declare we are independent, and prove it by writing a Constitution + Bill of Rights. And adopt it ie get Indy. Wales then appoints a rep to a European Constitutional Convention, which draws up the European Constitution + Bill of Rights. All the nations and regions in Europe do the same thing. Bottom up, not top down like all the old empires and the existing EU. Has worked like this in the USA for nearly 250 years.
Wales voted to leave the EU by an even greater margin than the UK.as a whole.
Adrian, FYI factual comments that do not fit with the narrative will be down voted 😉
Wales didn’t vote, people resident in Wales did vote, and as was famously proven by a study in Oxford University, it was English people that swung the vote in Wales…
So the ‘your countrymen’ & other jibes are factually inaccurate, as well as contributing to the usual anti Welsh rhetoric of the English nationalist extreme right…
I think this reflects a failure to grasp the reality of modern Wales. If there are so many ‘English’ people here that they can swing the vote so overwhelmingly in favour of Brexit, then I am afraid they are part of the fabric of Wales. Those people are here running vital services and businesses, and raising future citizens of Wales, often (in my experience) enthusiastically sending their kids to Cymraeg-speaking schools. They’re not popping over for the weekend. You can’t pick and choose what is ‘Welsh’ (good luck even defining it). And if you’re worried about immigration then you won’t… Read more »
How so? ‘Part of the fabric of Wales’ yes, however I’m guessing that your experience of integration & Welsh learning comes from mid Wales (where my English parents settled) rather than the (Brexit voting) pensioner coastal towns of the north coast, or the dormitory towns of NE Wales where more than half the population are English, and indeed often only reside in Wales because housing is cheaper than Cheshire, the only thing many of them do in Wales is sleep, I’m not blaming them BTW it isn’t their fault we have such a decrepit & useless planning system, Pick &… Read more »
Got some evidence Rob – or is this just a Trump-style ‘they stole my election’?
Cost me all of 15 seconds…
https://nation.cymru/news/wales-brexit-vote-caused-by-english-retirees-oxford-university/
So English people living in Cymru swung the leave vote did it.
I know many English incomers who voted to remain in The EU.
Of the areas that voted leave RCT, Merthyr Tydfil, Blaenau Gwent since when have they been majority English Incomer areas!
The English Incomers tend to live in the more sparsely populated areas.
As for the North East a very large proportion of the population who grew up there were born in The Countess of Chester hospital.
Does that make them English they will you No.
The idea that lots of small nations end up being peaceable is frankly beyond ridiculous. How did these large nations come to be??
Have you ever heard of democratic peace? The EU has a strict requirements for member states to join under the Copenhagen criteria relating to democratic norms, human rights, rule of law etc. That doesn’t mean to say that tensions don’t exist between democracies but there is no incentive to wage war against them, and its citizens wouldn’t allow it.
I’m not really sure how this relates to the size of countries making them more or less peaceful. The nation states of today are the result of absorption into neighbouring states either because they had no choice or because they felt safer or stronger together. I’m not even totally sure that democracy makes a nation more peaceful, it’s more complex than that. The US hasn’t been significantly invaded and yet can’t seem to go a decade without a war. The EU has been successful a preventing armed conflict internally but looks to be headed for conflict with Russia as a… Read more »
Not taking this seriously, for a start the map is an absolute joke, its all very well philosophising/daydreaming on an alternative structure for the entire of Europe, but, that has to be based on reality, not on what some random person would like to think is the case, Frisia, (for example) on the map it includes the province of Groningen where they speak a Dutch dialect, NW Germany where there are 5,000 speakers of a Frisian dialect and several million German speakers, and an area on the German/Danish border where there are 10,000 speakers of a 3rd dialect, also massively… Read more »
I am all for a Federal Europe, but why would you give Pirin Macedonia to Macedonia? There are no Macedonians living there, it is just the name of the historical region that is similar. If you had to apply the same logic to everyone then Macedonia would gain lands from Greece too.
It is absolutely riddled with massive inaccuracies…
Including showing Wales as one nation – this was only the case for a brief moment in history. Similarly Eire – this has never been one nation other than under English rule. And I’m sure there are plenty of people in Shetland and Orkney that would object to being included as part of Scotland, and Yorkshiremen who would object to being part of England