Poem on Sunday: This is not protection

Llinos Dafydd
I’m not trans. But I’m an advocate. And I’m angry.
This poem is a response to the UK Supreme Court ruling that says trans women can legally be excluded from single-sex spaces — even if they hold a gender recognition certificate.
It’s being called “clarity.”
I call it something else.
This Is Not Protection
(for my trans sisters, and anyone listening)
Don’t tell me this is protection.
Don’t dress up exclusion
as safety.
Don’t wave “biological sex”
like a badge
and expect me to call it neutral.
You’ve changed the law
to feel more comfortable.
Not safe.
Not kind.
Not fair.
Just comfortable.
You’ve turned courtrooms
into cages
and called it clarity.
But I see who you’re locking out.
Who you’re shaming,
blaming,
blurring,
burying
under headlines
you don’t even bother
to read past.
This isn’t about danger.
This is about control.
It’s about saying:
“You don’t belong.”
“You’re not one of us.”
“You’re close, but not quite.”
“You’re real, but not really.”
Well, fuck that.
You don’t get to draw the line
then blame them
for standing on the wrong side.
You don’t get to call it feminism
when it punches down.
I am not trans.
But I am furious.
And I am standing
with every woman
who’s been told
her body is a debate,
her identity is a threat,
her existence is a loophole.
You say this is protection?
No.
This is power,
grabbing itself another handful
of rights
that were never yours
to begin with.
Llinos Dafydd
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
What a petulant, self-righteous little temper-tantrum.
Indeed! And inaccurate too. No one has ‘changed the law’. The Supreme Court has simply pointed out what the law has always been.
I think you’ll find it was trans activists going after rights that were never theirs was the problem. Their rights remain unchanged, and are protected. Trans people have lost nothing in the ruling. Except perhaps the wrongful belief that they could erode women’s legal rights.