Andrew used taxpayers’ money for massages and travel, ex-civil servants claim
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor used taxpayers’ money for massages and excessive travel costs during his time as the UK’s trade envoy, retired civil servants have claimed.
The BBC reported that one ex-civil servant refused to pay to cover the costs of a massage for Andrew, but was overruled by senior staff, telling the broadcaster: “I thought it was wrong… I’d said we mustn’t pay it, but we ended up paying it anyway.”
A former Whitehall official, who oversaw finances, separately told the BBC they had “absolutely no doubt” about the authenticity of the claim after having seen similar expenses for his overseas trips.
Their words come as police searches of Andrew’s former home, Royal Lodge in Windsor, Berkshire, were expected to continue into Monday following his arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office on Thursday.
The former prince spent 11 hours in custody on his 66th birthday while officers searched his home on the Sandringham Estate in Norfolk before he was released under investigation.
Andrew is accused of sharing sensitive information with paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein during his time as UK’s special representative for international trade and investment.
In a video-taped interview under oath in 2009, Epstein’s former Florida housekeeper Juan Alessi said Andrew would have “daily massages” when he visited.
Speaking about the alleged use of taxpayers’ money for massages during his time as the UK’s trade envoy, the whistleblower who spoke to the BBC said: “I can’t say it would have stopped him, but we should have flagged that something was wrong.”
A separate Whitehall official, who said Andrew claimed for excessive flights, hotel rooms and charges for his entourage, told the broadcaster: “I couldn’t believe it… it was like it wasn’t real money, they weren’t spending any of their own money.”
Debate
Ahead of opposition day in the House of Commons on Tuesday, The Liberal Democrats said they may seek a debate to further scrutinise Andrew’s former role as the UK’s trade envoy.
A source within the political party said they were considering how to use opposition day to “secure more transparency and parliamentary scrutiny”.
On Monday, a Liberal Democrats source said: “This is a complex and fast moving situation, and the police must be allowed to get on with their important work.
“But we are carefully considering how best to use our opposition day to secure more transparency and parliamentary scrutiny around Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and his role as trade envoy, in the public interest.”
Calls have grown from a range of public figures for a wider probe into Andrew’s past dealings with Epstein.
He has denied any wrongdoing over his links to the convicted sex offender, but has not directly responded to the latest allegations.
Act of Parliament
Despite being stripped of his title last year, the former duke of York is still eighth in line to the throne, and an Act of Parliament would be required to remove Andrew and prevent him from ever becoming king.
Sir Keir Starmer’s Government will consider introducing such legislation once police have finished their investigation into the King’s disgraced brother, the Press Association understands.
On Sunday, the Prince and Princess of Wales made their first joint public appearance since the arrest, attending the Bafta awards on Sunday evening.
During the event, William told Elaine Bedell, chief executive of the Southbank Centre, and Allison Kirkby, chief executive of BT Group, that he had yet to see Hamnet – adding: “I need to be in quite a calm state and I’m not at the moment.”
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Fiddling expenses? If we go after all those cases then a majority of politicians and senior public servants will end up with a case to answer. Just go after the big crimes and if needed use the fiddling as evidence of the serious criminality by AMW and others.
They need to be very carefull, suggesting expenses were overclaimed. I believe a very large majority of persons going abroad for “our benefit”, probably claimed expenses for ” Personal use or items”. The whitehall mandarins, who oversee & approve these expenses, really need to think very carefully about these ” expenses” they approve. A thorough Police check/ investigation would show up a very large amount of incorrect expense claims & payments.
How did he have access to taxpayers’ money? You and I cannot do this? Do other royals have access to our money?
The artist formerly known as .. is always being quoted as denying ‘any wrongdoing’. Even if rules were constructed by Royal sychophantic senior civil servants to ensure (bogus) legality and propriety, only a profoundly moral bankrupt would proceed with this behaviour and when someone falls into that category, wrongdoing is a way of life
Look out for a new book on the antics of Andrew by Paul Burrell. I am sure he makes things up to suit the occasion. I don’t believe a word this guy says.