Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Angela Rayner’s £17,000 severance pay after tax row ‘outrageous,’ Tories say

15 Oct 2025 3 minute read
Photo James Manning/PA Wire

Angela Rayner’s receipt of a ministerial severance payment of nearly £17,000 after quitting Government over her tax affairs has been branded “outrageous” by the Conservatives.

She resigned as deputy prime minister, housing secretary and deputy Labour leader last month after an independent ethics probe found she had breached the ministerial code over her underpayment of stamp duty on a seaside flat.

Ms Rayner had referred herself to the standards watchdog for investigation after she admitted she had paid as much as £40,000 less surcharge than she should have done on the purchase in May.

In September, she received the £16,876 severance pay Cabinet ministers are entitled to when leaving office. It is equivalent to a quarter of their annual ministerial salary.

It was before new Labour rules came into effect this week under which members of Government found to have committed a “serious breach” of the ministerial code would be expected to forgo or repay their “golden goodbye”.

“Outrageous”

A spokesperson for the Ashton-under-Lyne MP said: “There is a world of difference between making an honest mistake and a severe breach of the ministerial code, and as the independent ethics adviser’s investigation concluded, Angela acted with integrity and an exemplary commitment to public service.”

It was suggested the new Labour rules would not have applied to her automatic eligibility for the severance pay because her ministerial code breach was not deemed serious.

But the Tories claimed rule-breaking was being rewarded.

Shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly said: “It’s outrageous Angela Rayner has been rewarded for dodging tax. Ordinary people’s tax money has been funneled straight into her pocket.

“We asked the Government about this in Parliament and they refused to answer the question. And now we know why: she’s getting a windfall that covers nearly half the tax bill she tried to avoid.”

“Wrongdoing”

He added: “Rayner has long campaigned for transparency on tax affairs. Clearly, that doesn’t apply to her own cash. As always with Labour, it’s one rule for them, and another for everyone else. The PM should find a backbone and ensure wrongdoing is not rewarded.”

Following her departure from the Cabinet, Ms Rayner faced Opposition pressure to reject the severance payment after she previously voted against allowing ministers under investigation to receive such payments.

In February last year, she voted in favour of a motion put forward by Labour, then in opposition, that would have deprived departing ministers of a severance payout until they were cleared of any allegations.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeff
Jeff
1 month ago

Its in the T+C that would allow the cons to do the same? Whats the problem. We pay johnson and truss and raab.

how is farages house purchase going. The one the press are ignoring.

Charles Coombes
Charles Coombes
1 month ago
Reply to  Jeff

She’s meant to be working class!

stp
stp
1 month ago

Ha! She’s never done an honest day’s work in her life!

Badger
Badger
1 month ago

Dialling up the hypocrisy to 11.

Frank
Frank
1 month ago

Most working people get penalised for wrongful behaviour and usually shown the door but it seems that politicians get rewarded and usually end up in better paid jobs. Something has gone wrong somewhere along the line. Why do we let them get away with it?

Badger
Badger
1 month ago
Reply to  Frank

They’ve deleted it now but the Telegraph ran an article by their resident tax advisor entitled “I’m a tax expert, and even I didn’t know about the rule Rayner broke”.

Howie
Howie
1 month ago
Reply to  Badger

It was not so much the rule which is there to be enforced it was the obfuscation saying she had took advice when clearly that was not the case as was pointed out by the conveyancing company.

Charles Coombes
Charles Coombes
1 month ago

Agree. Best thing she could do is give it to charity.

stp
stp
1 month ago

She was not sacked or made redundant, she resigned. Can anybody think of any other job were you get given a five figure sum for resigning?
Once again, taxpayers’ money is thrown around with gay abandon, because when they run out they can just take more from you and I. We are governed by thieves.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.