BT reveals prices will be reviewed under efforts to offset £100m Budget blow
The boss of BT has revealed that the telecoms giant is the latest to face a Budget cost hit, with an extra bill of around £100 million, and could look to hike prices to help offset the impact.
Chief executive Allison Kirkby said the group would go “harder and faster” with cost-cutting efforts to help counter the soaring tax increase due next year from the Government’s decision to raise employers’ National Insurance (NI) contributions.
She confirmed actions would include a review of prices charged to customers, alongside supply chain savings and aims to use artificial intelligence and automation to improve productivity.
Jobs
But she stressed the group would not look to strip out more roles under its cost-cutting programme, which is already set to see it slash up to 55,000 jobs worldwide by 2030.
It sees BT join the likes of Sainsbury’s, which also laid out its Budget tax bill pain on Thursday, as well as Marks & Spencer and Primark owner Associated British Foods, which have all revealed soaring costs from the employer NI changes.
Ms Kirkby said: “It’s a new inflationary pressure that we need to suffer in our business.
“We will be going harder and faster on the cost transformation and plans that we have already laid out,” she added.
Prices
She said that as part of the measures, the group would “look at our prices relative to input inflation”.
The revelation came as BT cut its annual sales outlook and revealed another 2,000 jobs have gone under its ongoing plan to slash costs.
It reported a 10% drop in pre-tax profits to £967 million for the six months to September 30 as revenues fell 3% to £10.1 billion amid a “competitive retail environment”.
Shares in the firm fell 6% as it said it now expects annual revenues to fall by 1% to 2%, blaming trading outside the UK and reductions to sales of less profitable kits, while it also flagged a weaker performance in the corporate and public sector.
BT had previously guided for revenues to rise by up to 1% in 2024-25.
But the company kept its underlying earnings guidance unchanged, for around £8.2 billion.
Cull
The firm also laid bare the pace of its previously announced jobs cull to slim down from 130,000 when the plan was first outlined in 2023 to between 75,000 and 90,000 workers by 2030 as it looks to shave billions off its cost base.
It said it slashed its workforce by just over another 2,000, or 4% year-on-year, to 118,000 and saved £433 million in annual costs in the first half alone.
Ms Kirkby said the group was also looking at potentially selling off or breaking up its international arm, which the group has been carving out from the rest of the business.
She said the firm had “positive dialogue” with other parties about BT Global.
“We are looking at a range of scenarios to optimise that business,” she said.
She took over the top role in February with aims to turn the business around and double down on cost-cutting efforts and aggressively roll out its full-fibre broadband network across the UK.
In May, the group announced a further £3 billion in cost cuts over the coming years, as Ms Kirkby expanded on plans to turn around the struggling telecoms giant.
She said at the time that the company had hit its initial target of £3 billion in savings a year before schedule, and said it would slash the same sum by 2029.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
A budget hit on businesses is not a hit on businesses at all……. it’s a direct hit on the consumer, the working man, the ordinary person in the street. There is no way on Earth that businesses will suffer. They just pass it on to us every time by increasing prices. The government know this but they think we are stupid enough not to realise what is going on. They like to make us think that the wealthy is being targeted. Bull💩 baffles brains and all that….
The Reeves budget will again increase the cost of living for millions and no real control on prices charged on consumers. The Regulators answerable to the Government ensure profits continue to flow into suppliers coffers and the Starmer Government sit idly by probably to benefit themselves from the freebies and the gravy train of future directorships.for themselves and their cronies