Conservatives will look to amend Government welfare Bill

The Conservatives will try to change the Government’s welfare Bill to tighten up access to personal independence payments (Pip) and universal credit.
Kemi Badenoch will pledge that the Tories are “now the only party committed to serious welfare reform” after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer shelved plans to restrict eligibility for Pip in the face of a backbench revolt this week.
Ministers have warned there will be costs to their backtracking on the plans, as Downing Street and the Treasury will be looking to cover the spending shortfall left by the decision.
Amendments
The Tories will look to lay amendments to the legislation – set to be renamed the Universal Credit Bill – and party leader Mrs Badenoch is due to deliver a speech on welfare on Thursday.
Among the amendments the Conservatives will propose is a requirement for eligibility for Pip to be determined by a face-to-face meeting, rather than virtually.
As part of the Government’s reforms, the Department for Work and Pensions has proposed a new “severe conditions criteria” for universal credit.
Claimants in this category will be entitled to a higher rate of the benefit, and will not be routinely reassessed to receive money.
Another of the Conservatives’ amendments would prevent somebody from being classed as having a severe condition for the purpose of universal credit only by having anxiety, mild depression, or ADHD.
The third amendment would block the increase in universal credit and restrict Pip for some people who are not British citizens.
Tough decisions
In her welfare speech, Mrs Badenoch is expected to say that the Conservatives are “the only party that is prepared to take the tough decisions to get spending under control”.
“I have no doubt that, emboldened by their success in forcing Starmer to U-turn last week, Labour’s backbench MPs will now be eyeing up more concessions,” she will say.
The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, and economists are now warning that tax rises are likely to plug the gap left by the concessions to rebels.
On Friday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves admitted that the fallout over the Government’s welfare Bill had been “damaging” and did not rule out tax rises in the autumn budget.
It came after images of the Chancellor crying during Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday spooked the financial markets and led to questions about her future, although a spokesman said she was upset by a personal matter.
In an interview with The Guardian, Ms Reeves said it would be “irresponsible” to rule out the idea of tax rises and warned “there are costs to what happened” with the welfare Bill.
The Sunday Times reported that the two-child benefit cap could be unlikely to be scrapped – as many Labour backbenchers want – as ministers look to balance the finances.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Tice, no mental help. Badenoch, no physical help. Parties merge? No help at all. Next ‘fit for work’ death charter pending. It got dunkin’ donuts a knighthood and a lot of people dead. As they used to say of buckets of water on Tiswas, ‘THIS IS WHAT THEY WANT’.
Government finances are tight so rather than look to those who can pay a bit more governments continue to target those in society who are struggling. Perhaps the welfare system does need reform but to threaten tax rises in the future if it isn’t is unfair, unjust and immoral. Labour, the Tories and Reform are afraid to target the richer part of our country. Either through the mythical fear of the rich doing a runner or because the parties are being financed by these people. Screwing those worse off, pinching every penny from them has to stop. It’s time things… Read more »
She hates people that need help. those US think thanks are getting their monies worth with her.
Tax. The. Rich. It’s not a difficult problem to solve, and you would need to be aware of the risks of capital flight and legislate defensively against them, but it’s doable. Those who have reaped the greatest benefit from society should be contributing more to the upkeep of that society, plus they aren’t doing anything with their riches other than watch them go up; the money has to go around by being spent in order to improve the economic situation of the country. The right have no solutions, only scapegoats, a group to point at while that empty your pockets… Read more »