Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Councillor reprimanded over ‘speak English’ comments to call handler

26 Apr 2026 4 minute read
The Civic Centre, Newport. Photo: LDRS.

Nicholas Thomas Local Democracy Reporter

A Newport councillor who told a call handler to “speak English” has been reprimanded and must complete extra training.

Independent councillor Janet Cleverly made the comments when she was reporting a fly-tipping incident to the local authority.

An ombudsman’s investigation described the Bettws ward councillor’s comments as “derogatory and humiliating”, and “not what is expected of an elected member”.

At a Newport City Council standards committee hearing, held on Thursday April 23, Cllr Cleverly apologised and said she was “mortified” by her actions.

During the phone conversation, the call handler had attempted to tell the councillor about “disruptive sounds” over the line, and asked her to repeat certain information.

According to the ombudsman’s report, Cllr Cleverly then interrupted the call handler and said: “I’m sorry, can I speak to somebody who’s speaking English?”

A few minutes later, the call handler was clarifying details when Cllr Cleverly said: “Sorry? I can’t understand anything you’re saying. Speak English!”

Later that day – August 9, 2024 – Cllr Cleverly emailed the cabinet member responsible for environmental matters.

In her email, she said: “I phoned in a complaint about fly tipping this morning and the person I spoke to, could not speak English properly, why would you have someone manning a call centre, I am all for equal opportunity’s (sic) but this person took all my information wrong after I had to repeat everything 3-4 times and spell everything lots of times.”

A manager in the customer services team listened to the recorded call, and flagged concerns about the councillor’s “unnecessary” tone.

The council’s monitoring officer at the time then told Cllr Cleverly he would be investigating the matter.

He said he considered the call handler’s English to be fluent, and the councillor’s comments to be “consciously or otherwise, racially motivated” and “discriminatory”.

According to the ombudsman’s report, the call handler was “very emotional and upset” about the incident, but went on to withdraw from the investigation.

Cllr Cleverly later told the ombudsman’s office she had “worked in BME communities” – (Black and Minority Ethnic) – in her career as a youth and community worker, and had “lots of BME friends”.

She described the phone call as a “really bad line” and said she apologised if she had upset the call handler – adding “it was not my intention”.

The ombudsman found the councillor had previously completed training on the local authority’s code of conduct, and sessions on equalities and equal opportunities.

Cllr Cleverly’s comments on the phone call were “unwarranted, derogatory and demeaning” – while the call handler had been “polite and friendly”, and using “proficient” English, the ombudsman found.

The apology was to be “welcomed” but the council’s standards committee should judge whether Cllr Cleverly had breached the code of conduct.

Parts of the committee hearing took place in private to protect the identity of the call handler, who was not present.

“I was absolutely mortified by my actions that day,” Cllr Cleverly told the panel, adding she had found it difficult to hear the call handler “at all”.

Cllr Kevin Whitehead, who leads the Bettws ward’s independents, said the phone call showed a “lack of etiquette” from his colleague but challenged any suggestion there was a racial element to the matter.

“I don’t think there was an intent or anything – [it was] poor etiquette and poor form,” he said.

He added Cllr Cleverly – who had shown “a lot of contrition” – had a long career helping young people and the Bettws community, and had received messages of support from people of diverse backgrounds.

The committee found Cllr Cleverly had breached three areas of the council’s code for members – relating to equality, respect and consideration of others, and disreputable conduct.

Chairman Andrew Mitchell said the “extremely concerned” panel had considered a suspension, but agreed instead to censure Cllr Cleverly and require her to promptly complete further training.

The council’s deputy monitoring officer had earlier explained a censure is “a formal reprimand”.


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Guess Again
Guess Again
8 days ago

Rude, entitled bigot is shocked at consequences of own actions

Will
Will
8 days ago
Reply to  Guess Again

Why would you say she was a bigot? Rude, probably, but don’t see how expecting a call handler to be able to speak English at a competent level is bigotted? CT payers should expect better service for their money.

Guess Again
Guess Again
8 days ago
Reply to  Will

She assumed the person wasn’t able to speak English. I suspect the real problem was she wouldn’t let the call handler get a word in.

slacker
slacker
8 days ago
Reply to  Will

Helps if you read the story…

“He said he considered the call handler’s English to be fluent, and the councillor’s comments to be “consciously or otherwise, racially motivated” and “discriminatory”.

Askevans
Askevans
7 days ago
Reply to  slacker

His opinion. No consideration seems to have been given to the callers circumstances. She was calling in a crime I assume to the correct people she is a councillor after all. It seems to have been a bad line and a lot of miscommunication, I think it is forgivable that she got ratty I would have. I worry this is a case of civil servants trying to control councillors.

David
David
8 days ago

I have some sympathy here. You would expect your car insurance company to have people who can communicate clearly with you (in English and Welsh) and Council Tax is no difference. Is the council really employing call handlers who cannot communicate properly? If so, why? It would be good to hear the actual call. Maybe it is rampant bigotry but maybe the council is at fault.

Tucker
Tucker
8 days ago
Reply to  David

Oh dear someone didn’t read the article and just came to post the simular bigoted nonsense.

Jane
Jane
8 days ago
Reply to  David

And yet it was reported in the article which you clearly couldn’t be bothered to read that the recorded call was listened to and that the call handler’s English was fluent. The call handler told the councillor there were noises on the line (also in the article) but the councillor took no notice. You are as much of a bigot as the councillor.

Fi yn unig
Fi yn unig
8 days ago

I always say research your Independents and i did but couldn’t find a link to the hate parties. However, this is trademark Toryform bigotry so that’s enough evidence for me.

Twffr
Twffr
8 days ago

The telephone line was bad and caused communication difficulties. Maybe the caller didn’t hear the call-handler say that the line was bad (because of the bad line!) So what made the caller blame the difficulty on the handler’s understanding of English? Could it be that the handler has answered the call with fluent Welsh or that they had an accent. That’s when the bigotry is revealed: your English must be at fault because I have noticed you have a different accent. They are then blind to the possibility of other reasons for the difficulty. Bigotry is stupid. Will the caller… Read more »

Johnny
Johnny
8 days ago

Comments disappearing again, well I don’t mind being down voted by G Crybabies News viewers and Tommy 10 Names Fanboys

Mark Mansfield
Admin
8 days ago
Reply to  Johnny

Hi Johnny. Your comments weren’t voted off. Parts of the thread disappeared because we blacklisted an individual who was posting and presumably voting under various aliases.

Johnny
Johnny
7 days ago
Reply to  Mark Mansfield

Diolch Mark

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.