Councillors reject new National Park plans

Richard Evans, local democracy reporter
Councillors have refused to give their backing to plans for a new national park in north Wales.
At a special meeting this week at Denbighshire council’s Ruthin County Hall HQ, councillors were tasked with coming up with a draft response to Natural Resource Wales’ (NRW) consultation on the proposed Glyndŵr National Park.
NRW has been assigned the job of looking at how a national park could be created within the Clwydian Range and Dee Valley National Landscape.
If given the green light, approximately 46% of Denbighshire ’s land area and 13% of its population would fall within the proposed Glyndŵr National Park boundary.
The proposed park would also stretch from Denbighshire into neighbouring Flintshire and Wrexham and would be the fourth in Wales – and the first since 1957.
The Welsh Government claims national parks help tourism, as well as protecting wildlife and the environment.
At the meeting yesterday (Tuesday), Denbighshire councillors decided not to support the proposal, with several members claiming the plans were not thought out.
Leader of the opposition, Cllr Huw Hilditch-Roberts proposed councillors rejected the endorsement of the national park, going against council officers’ recommendation, before cabinet later considers the issue.
Cllr Hilditch-Roberts feared the tighter planning legislation of a national park, coupled with insufficient infrastructure and funds, meant the council could not back the plans.
“Why would we want to put ourselves under more pressure by bringing in potentially 100,000 more visitors into Denbighshire when our infrastructure is not robust enough to handle it,” he said.
“We can’t get our own roads right. We can’t enforce parking across Denbighshire in every town every day because we can’t have enough people.
“We can’t clean our own bins in our towns anymore because of the waste system, and they are filling the public bins, and they can’t get to them in Ruthin here for example.
“We are losing services, and we are short of money. By supporting a plan that we don’t know how big that black hole is is absolutely suicidal at this time.
“Our priorities are the people of Denbighshire, and we should be putting them first – 100,000 people, but we are closing toilets.
“Where will they go into toilets when they are parked on the side of the road in these places? It is a massive issue.”
‘Impact’
He added: “The impact on the communities is massive, but we’ve talked about house prices. We haven’t met our house targets as it stands.
“By handcuffing us with planning through a national park, it will even further reduce the ability to be able to deliver the houses for the affordable homes we want in the area as we do.”
Cllr Hilditch-Roberts’ proposal was seconded by Cllr Terry Mendies. Cllr Hugh Evans questioned the value of a national park when the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty already set a high standard.
Cllr Evans said the consultation had been contained and controlled, and he questioned why NRW hadn’t directly engaged with town and community councils.
“They have been left out,” he said. “They are the voice of the community. So you have no local feel of what the impact of the positives are in those communities.”
Cllr Evans also speculated whether house prices could increase, with Cllr Jon Harland stating that creating a national park could create a “millionaires’ playground”.
Clarity
Officers had recommended councillors backed the proposals in principle but added the authority needed clarity on governance, planning, and financial arrangements, as well as transition plans, before NRW submits the Designation Order to Welsh Government.
The council voted to reject the proposals for the national park until more clarity is available and suggested the matter is deferred until after the Senedd Elections in 2026 when there could be more certainty on funding.
The final decision on Denbighshire Council’s recommendation will now be debated by cabinet.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.


How narrow minded. Don’t these councillors realise if we don’t get NP status they will have to fend off a second Birmingham as the cities in England are bursting/ i know which option I would prefer.
How exactly would you be paying for this then? Where are the resources going to come from? The Welsh Government haven’t offered anywhere near enough and the councillors have highlighted exactly what they will struggle with. Dealing with 100,000 tourists extra a year will mean roads need to be laid and maintained, they’re going to need places to stay, they’re going to make use of public services such as hospitals, emergency services, they’re going to have to spend even more money on maintaining properties according to stricter standards. What about toilets? More to the point, how are they going to… Read more »
The other National Parks don’t seem to have any problem finding money. This option is far better than another mini city and you know very well the English cities are over populated!!
Uh… https://www.cnp.org.uk/our-national-parks/why-we-campaign/funding-resources/
They very much have a problem finding money.
As far as I can tell, there’s basically nothing in this proposal that would stop the sprawl of any city/town (as it doesn’t cover any or really border any). What it will do is cause headaches for the people who live in the affected area.
Cities btw, are supposed to be populous, that’s the point.
Tourism will destroy the area. Witness Eryi or The Peak District
It might be the saving of Mid-Wales if Newtown grew to city status…
Thank goodness it has been rejected, it would just create another layer of officialdom, run by unaccountable bureaucrats.
Who on this planet is left unaccountable?
Good question Amir: Narcissists and Politicians…
And Cathedral Builders of course…
Lots of people, Putin, Trump, those people who got release from prison stupidly early….(like 45 minutes after they were put in there lmao). Some princes…
The reasoning is sound to me. If they do not have the funds and resources to maintain their current situation then asking them to do more in an even more tightly controlled way is a nonsense. It’s not as if the council have an infinite pot of money to draw on like the UK government (even the Welsh government cannot draw on an infinite pot).
Events? Look how much Glastonbury is generation. The secondary spend and the benefits to the area is huge:
The National Park Authorities cannot control tourism and the environmental social and economic impacts of these areas. Therefore the plan needs to be rejected
Planning has become a major problem in most National Parks.
My partner and I live just outside the boundary of the new projected national park. The existing ‘area of outstanding natural beauty’ starts smack opposite our house, so thart our immediate neighbours across the road from our property are within the ANOB, but we’re just outside it. And the proposition, at least in our Immediate area, is that the boundaries of the national park, if it’s implemented, will correspond to those of the ANOB. On balance I support the creation of the national park. Where we live is several miles away from any main road, so we don’t get that… Read more »
That is one heck of a land grab…
Identify the most likely targets for their head-quarters and defend them…
Today’s land owning aristocracy in Cymru contains few aristocrats or commoners…
Look to other national parks around the world which charge fees and use the money to promote sustainable tourism, protecting and enhancing the environment and supporting good jobs for local people. Just putting up a fence and some signs isn’t enough.
Sounds horrific. Charged money for taking a walk. What next, charging me for oxygen?
Why should locals pay for the upkeep of the paths wealthy Americans are enjoying for free?
A vote for common sense. We don’t need the 40% more tourists forecast to come to a new national park. That would create the chaos of over tourism we have seen elsewhere. Welsh Gov needs to start funding our Local Authorities and existing national Parks adequately first. We have seen cut backs year on year and so promises of more funding ring hollow to the Councillors who have been struggling to maintain basic services.