Decision due on whether Palestine Action legal challenge can go ahead
The co-founder of Palestine Action will find out whether she can bring a legal challenge over the decision to ban the group as a terror organisation.
Huda Ammori has made a bid to challenge Home Secretary Yvette Cooper’s decision to proscribe the group under anti-terror laws, announced after the group claimed responsibility for action in which two Voyager planes were damaged at RAF Brize Norton on June 20.
The ban means that membership of, or support for, the direct action group is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
Earlier this month, lawyers for Ms Ammori asked a judge to allow her to bring a High Court challenge over the ban, describing it as an “unlawful interference” with freedom of expression.
Mr Justice Chamberlain will give his decision on whether the legal action can proceed on Wednesday.
“Repugnant”
Raza Husain KC, for Ms Ammori, told the court at the hearing on July 21 that the ban had made the UK “an international outlier” and was “repugnant”.
Mr Husain added: “The decision to proscribe Palestine Action had the hallmarks of an authoritarian and blatant abuse of power.”
The Home Office is defending the legal action.
Sir James Eadie KC, for the department, said in written submissions that by causing serious damage to property, Palestine Action was “squarely” within part of the terrorism laws used in proscription.
He said: “There is no credible basis on which it can be asserted that the purpose of this activity is not designed to influence the Government, or to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.”
“Disgraceful”
Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, saying that the vandalism of the two planes, which police said caused an estimated £7 million of damage, was “disgraceful”.
The bid for a full High Court challenge comes after Ms Ammori failed in a previous bid to temporarily block the ban coming into effect, and the Court of Appeal dismissed a challenge over that decision less than two hours before the proscription came into force on July 5.
Support our Nation today
For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.
Yvette should just remove the proscription now.
There is no doubt that this organisation fits the UK legal definition of terrorism. There is no point about the usual troublemakers shouting and whining about it. Amnesty International a once reputable charity seems to have lost the plot. The Israeli and other nationality hostages held by Hamas and friends are prisoners whose plight Amnesty should concern itself with rather than joining the bandwagon about the issues. The Palestine problem does require an urgent solution but the activities of PA are not it.
I think the genocide in Palestine perpetrated by evil zionist government outranks any act of terrorism in history so far.
What about the Irish genocide?
Then there’s a case to be argued that the definition could use some work:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jul/30/palestine-action-law-arrest-protest-free-speech
Respect for the law is undermined when governments enact bad laws.