Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Estimated cost of asylum accommodation treble what was expected, says watchdog

07 May 2025 5 minute read
Image: Gareth Fuller / PA images

he cost of asylum accommodation is expected to be more than three times higher than previously estimated at £15.3 billion over 10 years, the public spending watchdog has said.

The National Audit Office (NAO) published a briefing into the Home Office’s contracts for housing asylum seekers on Wednesday to support an inquiry into the issue by the Commons’ Home Affairs Committee.

Original estimates from the Home Office for asylum accommodation and support contracts totalled £4.5 billion over the 10-year period for 2019-2029, the report said.

But, in 2024/2025, the current expected total stands at £15.3 billion over the same period, it said.

The watchdog said: “The Home Office’s total spend on asylum accommodation is more than planned and it has few levers to control costs.”

It added that the number of people seeking asylum housed in Home Office accommodation rose by 134% between December 2019 and 2024, from 47,000 to 110,000.

Asylum

The watchdog said this was because of the increase in people arriving in the UK by crossing the English Channel and a rise in those claiming asylum who were previously detained under the Conservative government’s Illegal Migration Act 2023.

So far this year, more than 11,500 people have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel, a record number for the first five months of the year since data was first collected in 2018.

The report also detailed that those temporarily living in hotels accounted for 35% of all people in asylum accommodation, and for about 76% of the annual cost of contracts – £1.3 billion of an estimated £1.7 billion in 2024-25.

The findings come ahead of MPs preparing to question contractors Clearsprings Ready Homes, Serco and Mears about their role sourcing and managing asylum accommodation next Tuesday.

‘Huge challenge’

Reacting to the report, Home Affairs Committee chairwoman Dame Karen Bradley said: “Dealing with the cost of the asylum accommodation system remains a huge challenge for the Government.

“The NAO report reveals that the cost of these contracts is likely to be over three times what was envisaged when they were drawn up.”

On questioning providers, Dame Karen added: “We want to see why costs have risen so dramatically, but will also be looking at the quality of support that is provided, and will be challenging providers on failures to meet key performance indicators in recent years.”

The NAO’s report also said data from suppliers “suggests that hotels may be more profitable than other forms of accommodation”, while profit margins for contractors average 7% – which is within the Home Office’s original estimate of between 5-13%.

The watchdog also reported as of March 31 2025, the Home Office has taken £4 million off suppliers’ revenues – accounting for less than 1% – for reported underperformance since 2019.

It comes as the Home Office ended the use of supplier Stay Belvedere Hotels (SBHL), subcontracted by Clearsprings, after its performance and behaviour “fell short” of expectations.

Announcing the move in March, Home Office minister Dame Angela Eagle had also told MPs a full audit was being conducted of the supply chain.

Reacting to the latest estimate, Reform UK’s newest MP Sarah Pochin doubled down on plans for the party, who won control of a number of councils in the local elections, to “vigorously oppose” asylum accommodation.

“We will use every legal tool available including injunctions, judicial reviews, and planning laws to block the housing of asylum seekers in hotels in the areas we govern.” she said.

Accommodation

Meanwhile, 53 organisations providing frontline support to refugees and asylum seekers have written to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper urging for the management of asylum accommodation to be transitioned from private contractors to local authorities or third-sector organisations.

Conversation Over Borders, Refugee Action, Refugee Council and others have said the change should focus on “cost-effective, humane” housing solutions that integrate people seeking asylum into communities they are placed.

They added the public’s frustration over inadequate housing is “real and justified” but asylum seekers have been “unfairly blamed for the strain on these services” as they called for diverted investment into social housing for all.

Since the Labour Government came to power in July last year, 23 hotels have been closed while contracts were discontinued at three large sites, such as the Bibby Stockholm barge.

Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent, is also due to close and be returned to the Ministry of Defence in September.

Responding to the NAO’s findings, a Home Office spokesperson said: “As this report shows we inherited an asylum system in chaos with tens of thousands stuck in a backlog, claims not being processed and disastrous contracts that were wasting millions in taxpayer money.

“We’ve taken immediate action to fix it – increasing asylum decision-making by 52% and removing 24,000 people with no right to be here, meaning there are now fewer asylum hotels open than since the election.

“By restoring grip on the system and speeding up decision making we will end the use of hotels and are forecast to save the taxpayer £4 billion by the end of 2026.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Brad
Brad
15 hours ago

We didn’t need hotels in 2016.

Adrian
Adrian
14 hours ago

If only somone had been warning of this…oh, hang on!

Brad
Brad
12 hours ago
Reply to  Adrian

Did you warn the Brexiteers that leaving the Dublin deterrent would expose the UK to the same flows of people fleeing war and persecution as the continent? Did you point out that removing the chance of being returned to the first safe country to be processed and ultimately settled anywhere in the EU would encourage people to risk their lives to reach the UK knowing they’d remain there if their claim was successful? Did you tell them that Whitehall isn’t up to the job of handling this sort of workload, resulting in cases that other more competent governments can process… Read more »

Tucker
Tucker
36 minutes ago
Reply to  Adrian

You knew what you were voting for. Third country status and now you’re moaning about it.

Garycymru
Garycymru
1 hour ago

These extra costs should be covered by the Brexit voters and the liars in nigels last party. This whole immigration mess is down to them, the ones who knew what they were voting for.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.