Support our Nation today - please donate here
News

Farmers call for inheritance tax U-turn ahead of crunch talks with ministers

04 Nov 2024 3 minute read
Farmer
Reversing plans to charge inheritance tax on farms is “the only sensible course of action”, the head of the National Farmers’ Union has said as he prepares for crunch talks with the Environment Secretary.

NFU president Tom Bradshaw is to meet Steve Reed on Monday amid a growing furore over the Chancellor’s decision to make farms subject to inheritance tax.

Under plans announced at the Budget, inheritance tax will be charged at 20% on farms worth more than £1 million, although the Chancellor has said in some cases the threshold could in practice be around £3 million.

“Final straw”

But writing in the Daily Telegraph, Mr Bradshaw said the prospect of being unable to pass their businesses on to their children would be “the final straw” for many farmers.

He said: “The vast majority of the people who will bear the brunt of this decision aren’t wealthy people with huge cash reserves hidden away.

“They are families that have often spent generations building up their farm businesses to provide food for the nation, often on very tight profit margins.“Their businesses have struggled through all the changes caused by Brexit, they’ve suffered years of being squeezed to the lowest margins imaginable, with costs of production skyrocketing, they’ve been battered by increasingly extreme weather conditions. They have nothing left to give.”

Tax experts have suggested the changes could affect fewer than 500 farms a year, once the tax thresholds and farmers giving their property to their children before they die are taken into account.

“Skewed view”

But Mr Bradshaw said the Treasury had a “completely skewed view of the structure of farming in the UK”.He said: “Very few viable farms are worth under £1 million.

That could buy you 50 acres and a house today. No viable food-producing business is 50 acres. The average farm in the UK is more than 250 acres.

“The only sensible course of action for the future of family farms across the country, as well as for the sake of Britain’s food security and our legislated environmental targets, is to reverse this decision.”Chancellor Rachel Reeves told the BBC’s Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: “Only a very small number of agricultural properties will be affected, but last year the benefits of agricultural property relief, 40% of the benefit was felt by 7% of the wealthiest land owners.

“I don’t think it is affordable to carry on with a relief like that when our public finances are under so much pressure.”


Support our Nation today

For the price of a cup of coffee a month you can help us create an independent, not-for-profit, national news service for the people of Wales, by the people of Wales.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Evan Aled Bayton
Evan Aled Bayton
1 month ago

Essentially like so much modern government they didn’t do their research. It really needs to be recalibrated so that the mesh lets the smaller fish escape and catches the massive psuedofarmers avoiding tax. Exactly the same approach crashed the NHS reforms of Kenneth Clark which were imposed ideology without any research into the actual processes on the ground.

Howie
Howie
1 month ago

You have to wonder the suitability and experience of the people who carry out the impact assessments for govt prior to implementing policies, as there are similar issues of glaring omissions of rudimentary problems that occur time after time.

hdavies15
hdavies15
1 month ago
Reply to  Howie

All driven by ideology which might be reasonable in a wholly urban society where every one lives in 1-30 rooms relying purely on cashable investments and incomes from employment. By now it should be obvious that there is a limit to the viable divisibility of the majority of family farms.

Our Supporters

All information provided to Nation.Cymru will be handled sensitively and within the boundaries of the Data Protection Act 2018.